Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
LOL. Not by Democrats, that's not for sure. Look, I never said our debt had to be paid down to zero but we shouldn't be fiscally irresponsible and get it up to 32 trillion dollars and counting. You guys never want to pay anything down on the debt, ever.And YOU stupidly think the debt has to be paid down to zero.
When has that ever happened?
What? We just cut future spending rates, because Republicans talked about while Democrats had refused to even discuss it.And the right only talk about it.
Republicans just talked about cutting spending now while Democrats had refused to even talk about it. It's done. Now it's time for you to lie about it and claim that spending was cut under Biden's presidency.LOL...
What republican talked about cutting spending from 2017 to 2021? It certainly wasn't you.
So fuck off .
I may very well not vote for him. I'm certainly not going to vote for him in the primaries. I'm also looking at other options, such as Independents and NO LABELS. Hell, Libertarians may even decide to put up a real candidate, although it's something they've never done before. But, socialists will not get my vote. I'll gladly vote for Trump over woke socialists. But, it's good to hear you admit that you know Trump won't be in jail.So if he gets the nomination...you're not going to vote for him? You've lied so much already that nobody believes you so just go ahead and say "no" and add another lie to the Mt. Everest sized pile you've created.
What? We just cut future spending rates, because Republicans talked about while Democrats had refused to even discuss it.
Make you feel better now?
We just did it, even though Democrats had said they refused to even talk about it."Talked about it". I've already covered that.
We just did it, even though Democrats had said they refused to even talk about it.
1994 under ClintonIt was a minor thing when not holding the presidency. Was it done under Trump? No. Was it done under Bush? No.
No, Democrats would not spend less under any of them.It was a minor thing when not holding the presidency. Was it done under Trump? No. Was it done under Bush? No.
still waiting on him to say what demofk congress cut spending once.No, Democrats would not spend less under any of them.
In fact, they are always talking about spending trillions of dollars and stupidly think the rich have 32 trillion dollars.
Then why talk about the rich having to have 32 trillion?Look, I never said our debt had to be paid down to zero
Don't hold your breath.still waiting on him to say what demofk congress cut spending once.
It is YOU GUYS who think the rich can come up with 32 trillion dollars, not those on the right.Then why talk about the rich having to have 32 trillion?
Provided the GDP is growing, and the so-called "national debt" isn't 100%+ our GDP, we're fine. If the money the federal government spends is for vital services and infrastructural development, there's zero danger of hyperinflation. Our current federal budget is peanuts when compared to our GDP.Think about it. Karine Jean-Pierre says:
“You’ve heard from the president multiple times during the last five months. He’s been very clear,” she said. “You’ve heard from the president; you’ve heard from the economic team; you’ve heard from Democrats, the leadership in the House, in the Senate talk — speak to this about the urgency, about Congress actually needing to act and doing their constitutional duty.”
So, if it was set up that it is up to Congress to raise the debt ceiling then that pretty much means that it isn't an automatic thing if they have to decide to do it. So, it is not Congress's Constitutional duty to just raise the debt ceiling automatically because it was set up that they debate it.
Further, I find it fairly amusing that some Democrats want to use the 14th amendment from 1868 to override a law from 1917.
Not to mention, Republicans in the House have already passed a debt ceiling increase. We're waiting on the Senate and Biden to pass it into law.
House Democratic angst grows as Biden's debt limit negotiations with GOP drag on
House Democratic anxieties are flaring over President Joe Biden's debt ceiling negotiations with Republican Speaker Kevin McCarthy to avert a U.S. default.www.yahoo.com
I didn't say it would or will happen, just that the country would be better off with zero debt, just as any individual would be better off with no debt.Enjoy the fantasy
Again. A fantasyI didn't say it would or will happen, just that the country would be better off with zero debt, just as any individual would be better off with no debt.
If we don't need to pay the debt down to zero...how does that make any sense?It is YOU GUYS who think the rich can come up with 32 trillion dollars, not those on the right.
Actually Clinton had a surplus at the end of his second term and passed that on to Bush...who could blow it on tax cuts fast enough.LOL. Not by Democrats, that's not for sure. Look, I never said our debt had to be paid down to zero but we shouldn't be fiscally irresponsible and get it up to 32 trillion dollars and counting. You guys never want to pay anything down on the debt, ever.
No sir, you're incorrect. The so-called "national debt" could just as well be called the "national surplus". Individuals like you and me, are currency users, not currency issuers. We don't issue the dollar, we use it. There's a vast difference between our personal or household debt and the US federal government's "debt". The federal government really doesn't have a debt, the "scary debt" or "31 trillion" both Republican and Democrat politicians like to throw around to terrify the public, is but a ledger of how much money is being saved in the economy in treasury bonds and in other assets, including personal savings. It's the money that the government prints that isn't returned to the government in taxes and in other fees (licenses, permits..etc.).I didn't say it would or will happen, just that the country would be better off with zero debt, just as any individual would be better off with no debt.
