Girls Star Lena Dunham Opens Up About Being Sexually Assaulted in College - ABC News
RE: What's missing from the sexual assault conversation is that every guy that crosses the line isn't a "straight villain," Dunham said.
"Women need to learn to speak out and guys need to talk to each other about consent," she said. "There is no 'No' that means 'Yes.'"
Did you catch that at the end:
"There is no 'No' that means 'Yes.'"
How can we expect to teach anyone that NO means NO
when our political system is CONSTANTLY used to override dissension
as "you consented when you agreed to use this system of majority rule"
If rape can still happen within marriage, and after an agreement to have intimate relations
if one partner stops or changes their mind and says NO I DON'T AGREE WITH THIS.
WHY isn't it respected when someone says NO this policy excludes or violates my beliefs.
WHY does it take a court order to reverse bad legislation that should not have been passed in the first place.
WHY is there no accountability or consequences for pushing bad laws, but this is ENCOURAGED
to force other people to defend their beliefs legally.
Liberals I know don't like having to fight for rights such as marriage they think should already be part of religious freedom.
Why should Conservative have to fight to "restore" rights to free choice in how to pay for health care they don't believe should have been abridged by federal mandates requiring insurance as the only choice to avoid fines.
When people on both sides KNOW that there are conflicting beliefs and people do NOT consent to how a law is written, why not fix it first? Why this insistence on passing a law knowing it is contested and then
trying to DISCREDIT dissenters as "agreeing to it anyway."
How is this not like the rape and bullying culture that liberals are so opposed to?
Or am I the only liberal arguing for free choice and equal inclusion of people of all views?
RE: What's missing from the sexual assault conversation is that every guy that crosses the line isn't a "straight villain," Dunham said.
"Women need to learn to speak out and guys need to talk to each other about consent," she said. "There is no 'No' that means 'Yes.'"
Did you catch that at the end:
"There is no 'No' that means 'Yes.'"
How can we expect to teach anyone that NO means NO
when our political system is CONSTANTLY used to override dissension
as "you consented when you agreed to use this system of majority rule"
If rape can still happen within marriage, and after an agreement to have intimate relations
if one partner stops or changes their mind and says NO I DON'T AGREE WITH THIS.
WHY isn't it respected when someone says NO this policy excludes or violates my beliefs.
WHY does it take a court order to reverse bad legislation that should not have been passed in the first place.
WHY is there no accountability or consequences for pushing bad laws, but this is ENCOURAGED
to force other people to defend their beliefs legally.
Liberals I know don't like having to fight for rights such as marriage they think should already be part of religious freedom.
Why should Conservative have to fight to "restore" rights to free choice in how to pay for health care they don't believe should have been abridged by federal mandates requiring insurance as the only choice to avoid fines.
When people on both sides KNOW that there are conflicting beliefs and people do NOT consent to how a law is written, why not fix it first? Why this insistence on passing a law knowing it is contested and then
trying to DISCREDIT dissenters as "agreeing to it anyway."
How is this not like the rape and bullying culture that liberals are so opposed to?
Or am I the only liberal arguing for free choice and equal inclusion of people of all views?