Is climate change the new race card ???

[Slade3200]

I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

When you say "regressives" are you referring to the opposite of progressives aka. conservatives?

 

[owebo]

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

When you say "regressives" are you referring to the opposite of progressives aka. conservatives?

Yes...conservatives will stop your liberal regression....

 

[Slade3200]

I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

You honestly think that environmentalist care more about power and control and not about trying to keep our world clean and safe? Seriously??

 

[owebo]

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

You honestly think that environmentalist care more about power and control and not about trying to keep our world clean and safe? Seriously??

Liberal fascist environazis only care about reducing the population and stopping development....period....

 

[blastoff]

Well the Magic Negro's only gonna be around for another 42 days so they've got to pivot to something and the phony climate hoax is as good as anything.

 

[Slade3200]

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

You honestly think that environmentalist care more about power and control and not about trying to keep our world clean and safe? Seriously??

Liberal fascist environazis only care about reducing the population and stopping development....period....

Wingnut hippies, yes, they want to live in nature and hump trees all day, they don't like any kind of development. The majority of environmentalist support clean energy and less pollution. This involved a new sector of development with solar, wind, and alternative energy production. There is a middle ground. Not everybody is a wingnut hippy.

 

[Slade3200]

Question for the deniers... You surly understand how ecosystems work, right? Take a fish tank. If not properly maintained it goes to shit very quickly and everything dies. Now scale the fishtank out to the much much larger and more complex world we live in. There is definitely an effect of polluting, drilling, dumping, burning etc etc... The question is what is that effect and how does it effect our habitat. I don't see why anybody would want to turn a blind eye to this or out right deny its existence... You do realize if it does have a significant effect or even a subtle one once it reaches a critical mass, the tipping point, there is no going back... Is that something you really want to gamble with or pass on to our future generations?

 

[owebo]

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

You honestly think that environmentalist care more about power and control and not about trying to keep our world clean and safe? Seriously??

Liberal fascist environazis only care about reducing the population and stopping development....period....

Wingnut hippies, yes, they want to live in nature and hump trees all day, they don't like any kind of development. The majority of environmentalist support clean energy and less pollution. This involved a new sector of development with solar, wind, and alternative energy production. There is a middle ground. Not everybody is a wingnut hippy.

Middle ground? yes, there is...coal...

 

[owebo]

Question for the deniers... You surly understand how ecosystems work, right? Take a fish tank. If not properly maintained it goes to shit very quickly and everything dies. Now scale the fishtank out to the much much larger and more complex world we live in. There is definitely an effect of polluting, drilling, dumping, burning etc etc... The question is what is that effect and how does it effect our habitat. I don't see why anybody would want to turn a blind eye to this or out right deny its existence... You do realize if it does have a significant effect or even a subtle one once it reaches a critical mass, the tipping point, there is no going back... Is that something you really want to gamble with or pass on to our future generations?

Yes...liberals take away the tools to maintain the fish tank to kill it, so there is no more fish tank to use tools they don't like...

As for your argument...you interjected emotion, and therefore lost the debate because you have no facts...

 

[beagle9]

I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

. The left has got it's card playing down to a science, except it's unproven science and yet they go with it any way ???? Why ???? I believe most of it is just a huge scam for wealth transfer or the justification there of.

 

[Rustic]

I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??

Much like gun control, climate change is used to control people... it's all about control

 

[beagle9]

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

You honestly think that environmentalist care more about power and control and not about trying to keep our world clean and safe? Seriously??

Under Demon-crat directive, YES.

 

[OKTexas]

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

When you say "regressives" are you referring to the opposite of progressives aka. conservatives?

See my sig. Reading is fundamental.

 

[OKTexas]

Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.

. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.

My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.

I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.

The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.

You honestly think that environmentalist care more about power and control and not about trying to keep our world clean and safe? Seriously??

People like your dear leader and the UN, you bet your ass.

 

[OKTexas]

Question for the deniers... You surly understand how ecosystems work, right? Take a fish tank. If not properly maintained it goes to shit very quickly and everything dies. Now scale the fishtank out to the much much larger and more complex world we live in. There is definitely an effect of polluting, drilling, dumping, burning etc etc... The question is what is that effect and how does it effect our habitat. I don't see why anybody would want to turn a blind eye to this or out right deny its existence... You do realize if it does have a significant effect or even a subtle one once it reaches a critical mass, the tipping point, there is no going back... Is that something you really want to gamble with or pass on to our future generations?

The earth has been changing since day one, it's arrogance to think you can change that fact. Solar cycles have more effect on earth temps than man will ever have. Responsible stewardship doesn't need to include playing Robinhood.

 

[Slade3200]

Question for the deniers... You surly understand how ecosystems work, right? Take a fish tank. If not properly maintained it goes to shit very quickly and everything dies. Now scale the fishtank out to the much much larger and more complex world we live in. There is definitely an effect of polluting, drilling, dumping, burning etc etc... The question is what is that effect and how does it effect our habitat. I don't see why anybody would want to turn a blind eye to this or out right deny its existence... You do realize if it does have a significant effect or even a subtle one once it reaches a critical mass, the tipping point, there is no going back... Is that something you really want to gamble with or pass on to our future generations?

Yes...liberals take away the tools to maintain the fish tank to kill it, so there is no more fish tank to use tools they don't like...

As for your argument...you interjected emotion, and therefore lost the debate because you have no facts...

Which part of my statement was emotional?

 

[RealDave]

The only redistribution going on is from the poor and middle to the rich.

Climate change is fact...Have fun sleeping as the world goes to shit.

Yeah youre right it is fact, the Earth never has the same climate, you passed basic science, congrats.

People gain & lose weight all the time so my diet of 5 pizzas & 6 beers a day is not the reason.

 

[RealDave]

Question for the deniers... You surly understand how ecosystems work, right? Take a fish tank. If not properly maintained it goes to shit very quickly and everything dies. Now scale the fishtank out to the much much larger and more complex world we live in. There is definitely an effect of polluting, drilling, dumping, burning etc etc... The question is what is that effect and how does it effect our habitat. I don't see why anybody would want to turn a blind eye to this or out right deny its existence... You do realize if it does have a significant effect or even a subtle one once it reaches a critical mass, the tipping point, there is no going back... Is that something you really want to gamble with or pass on to our future generations?

The earth has been changing since day one, it's arrogance to think you can change that fact. Solar cycles have more effect on earth temps than man will ever have. Responsible stewardship doesn't need to include playing Robinhood.

So when temps go up during a low energy solar cycle?
Man has been adding to the greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. To dent that is well beypound stupid.

According to you, we should not look at the major spewers of these gases because that is being Robin Hood? Are you really this stupid?

 

[owebo]

The only redistribution going on is from the poor and middle to the rich.

Climate change is fact...Have fun sleeping as the world goes to shit.

Yeah youre right it is fact, the Earth never has the same climate, you passed basic science, congrats.

People gain & lose weight all the time so my diet of 5 pizzas & 6 beers a day is not the reason.

No, it was that spec of dust that landed on you.....

 

[owebo]

Question for the deniers... You surly understand how ecosystems work, right? Take a fish tank. If not properly maintained it goes to shit very quickly and everything dies. Now scale the fishtank out to the much much larger and more complex world we live in. There is definitely an effect of polluting, drilling, dumping, burning etc etc... The question is what is that effect and how does it effect our habitat. I don't see why anybody would want to turn a blind eye to this or out right deny its existence... You do realize if it does have a significant effect or even a subtle one once it reaches a critical mass, the tipping point, there is no going back... Is that something you really want to gamble with or pass on to our future generations?

The earth has been changing since day one, it's arrogance to think you can change that fact. Solar cycles have more effect on earth temps than man will ever have. Responsible stewardship doesn't need to include playing Robinhood.

So when temps go up during a low energy solar cycle?
Man has been adding to the greenhouse gases in our atmosphere. To dent that is well beypound stupid.

According to you, we should not look at the major spewers of these gases because that is being Robin Hood? Are you really this stupid?

So according to you, to save the world, we should ban nature?