Is climate change the new race card ???

Hoaxers hoaxing....
i am waiting on an explanation of how global warming is bringing in our first polar vortex that will have the average temp of the U.S. around 0.0 degrees this weekend.
A puking liberal explaining global warming? That's like asking a bullfrog to explain interstellar flight.
Or asking a right winger to make sense.
You can only understand settled science.....how sad.....
 
Climate change was BHO's pet peeve.

It will now die for at least the next 4 to 8 years if not forever.
. Out of his hands, the EPA might gain some credibility back, but for now things must be looked at to see what is bull shite and what is a true issue that needs environmental control applied. Many government institutions have lost credibility due to the libs being involved in them, and for whom sought to use government for their gazillions of anti-America(n) agenda's they had going.
 
Hoaxers hoaxing....
i am waiting on an explanation of how global warming is bringing in our first polar vortex that will have the average temp of the U.S. around 0.0 degrees this weekend.
A puking liberal explaining global warming? That's like asking a bullfrog to explain interstellar flight.
Or asking a right winger to make sense.
You can only understand settled science.....how sad.....
Thank you for proving my point.
 
Hoaxers hoaxing....
i am waiting on an explanation of how global warming is bringing in our first polar vortex that will have the average temp of the U.S. around 0.0 degrees this weekend.
A puking liberal explaining global warming? That's like asking a bullfrog to explain interstellar flight.
Or asking a right winger to make sense.
You can only understand settled science.....how sad.....
Thank you for proving my point.
You made no point, but you're welcome.....
 
Every area of science is constantly challenged, questioned, and peer reviewed and deemed good science for doing so. Except for climate change :eusa_think:
How can your statement be true when the next leader of the free world and his newly appointed head of the EPA are both on record challenging the science of climate change?
 
I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??


Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.
. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.


My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.
 
I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??


Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.
. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.


My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.
I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.
 
Of course there is Climate Change, the question is whether it's from man's destruction of the earths resources or natural cyclic phenomena.

If you think about it & put it into perspective....the earth has been here for how many (m)(b)(tr)illions of years? And how many climatic changes have occurred during that time? And how many years has man been polluting it? Since the Industrial Age began within the last 200-300 years?

Man's direct impact is more like a gnat on an elephants ass. The earth has been experiencing 'Global Warming' since the last Ice Age.
You do realize that in many of those changes, the Earth was basically unlivable for mankind, right?

The Earth won't die. People will.

Man has increased the greenhouse gas levels & that has been proven. Evidently, your ass has been attacked by some very large gnats.
 
I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??
You mean how when you racists spew slurs & hatespeak you run screaming " OMG OMG the race card"?
 
The only redistribution going on is from the poor and middle to the rich.

Climate change is fact...Have fun sleeping as the world goes to shit.


Yeah youre right it is fact, the Earth never has the same climate, you passed basic science, congrats.
 
Every area of science is constantly challenged, questioned, and peer reviewed and deemed good science for doing so. Except for climate change :eusa_think:
How can your statement be true when the next leader of the free world and his newly appointed head of the EPA are both on record challenging the science of climate change?

Because climate change is not science.
 
I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??
You mean how when you racists spew slurs & hatespeak you run screaming " OMG OMG the race card"?


What bullshit, opposite Obamacare was racist to dipshits like you.

And saying ****** doesnt make you a racist dumbass.
 
You're a RACIST!!!!! You're a CLIMATE CHANGE DENIER!!!!! Oh, THE HUMANITY!!!!
yddayaddatadda...

Sorry Liberals. That doesn't work anymore. We have been snake bit enough times we are now immune to venom. You need to find a difference way of proving your point during a debate. May I suggest logic, reason, and irrefutable evidence?

Instead of a reflection on us, it only goes to show your ignorance and intolerance.
 
I mean it seems that these two words are being thrown around as bad as or as hap- hazzardly as the race card is thrown around. The wind blows it's climate change, the wind don't blow it's climate change, the heat wave hit's then it's climate change, the cold wave hit's of course it's climate change, a strong hurricane hit's then it's caused by climate change, and on and on and on it goes. Think about it.. Good grief... I think it's a scam to move money around or it's a wealth redistribution scheme. What say you ??


Nope, by June or July the public will forget all about it because the Trump admin won't be talking about it constantly.
. Not the point here... The point is this - The left loves to use cards to hold America down or back, and the climate card was just another one of those cards they would throw down willy nilly as a way to get their way, and to hell with the economic strength of this nation. We can't become a great nation again by being a weakling in everything we do or in everything we talk about.


My point is the regressives try to use their various cards to control the conversation. If our leadership stops introducing the topic in conversation, people will stop talking about it as well.

There will be a few die hard idiots that will keep trying to introduce it, but when they realize they lack the power to do anything on the topic, they too will stop. When other countries see the US isn't going to transfer wealth to third world shit holes just because we are successful, other major economies will follow.

With this election the regressives have just lost their levers of control, including the control of the conversation. Their little card game is one the group has decided they aren't going to play any more, and now regressives don't have the teacher, so to speak, to force others to play.
I find your statement rather hypocritical and nonsensical... of course progressives play a card, it's called making a point. You do it, conservatives do it, liberals do it, everybody does it. Yes, some over play their cards, but it happens on both sides.


The difference is regressives play them to attempt to end the conversation, like the lie that the science is settled. The science is far form settled, none of the apocalyptic predictions of the alarmist have materialized. Their predictive models have proven to be useless, but has that caused a change in tone, not even close. When you realize that everything the regressives do is about controlling people and limiting freedom and transferring form the haves to the the have nots, the picture is pretty clear. Even pukes at the UN have admitted it's not really about climate, it's all about control and transfer of wealth on a global scale.
 
Every area of science is constantly challenged, questioned, and peer reviewed and deemed good science for doing so. Except for climate change :eusa_think:
How can your statement be true when the next leader of the free world and his newly appointed head of the EPA are both on record challenging the science of climate change?

Because climate change is not science.
How is studying the state of our habitat in relation to human activity not science??
 
Every area of science is constantly challenged, questioned, and peer reviewed and deemed good science for doing so. Except for climate change :eusa_think:
How can your statement be true when the next leader of the free world and his newly appointed head of the EPA are both on record challenging the science of climate change?
You mean MMGW.....
yes
No one is challenging climate change.,,,
 
Every area of science is constantly challenged, questioned, and peer reviewed and deemed good science for doing so. Except for climate change :eusa_think:
How can your statement be true when the next leader of the free world and his newly appointed head of the EPA are both on record challenging the science of climate change?

Because climate change is not science.
How is studying the state of our habitat in relation to human activity not science??
It is....
 

Forum List

Back
Top