Is Calling For The Death Of Jews On College Campuses Really Protected Speech?

The other day a few professors and college presidents attempted to dance their way out of a question about bigotry on campus.

They claimed that hate speech is protected if you take into consideration the context.

What they mean is if the context is hate speech against a protected class, race, or religion you cannot expect protections under the 1st Amendment.

That means it's okay to call for the genocide of Jews, but you can't say anything negative about blacks, Muslims, or people in the LGBTQ+ community.

But that's not what the 1st Amendment says. And the 1st Amendment isn't a shield to Jew haters.

If you're calling for the murder of anyone, you're attempting to incite violence against them. The context doesn't matter, because hate speech against Jews will eventually lead to violence against Jews. They hashed this out in the courts when they said that if you incite people to commit a rape you're just as guilty as the rapist.
Anyone who goes out in the public and chants genocide of Jews is just as guilty as the person who tries to carry it out.



What do you think would happen if a College President argued that recommending genocide for all the blacks in our nation was just free speech and should be allowed.
 
I was threatened by Google when I responded to a YouTube video that all Hamas AND THEIR SUPPORTERS need to be done executed.

Apparently Google/YouTube is okay with threats to INNOCENT Jews but calling for the death of actual Hamas supporters is "hate against an ethnic group.". Leftists have twisted values
Google is to the left. Thus, like 90% of leftists, they defend criticism of Islamic terrorists and are just fine with calls to genocide Jews.
 

Forum List

Back
Top