Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I know I saw this mentioned somewhere but see no thread on it now.
Does anyone believe that a few local low level IRS employees engaged in systematic harassment of conservative groups? If so I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell. This is bigger than Benghazi.
AP News: AP Exclusive: IRS knew tea party targeted in 2011
Did you or do you support profiling Muslims in airports?
That is a cop out, Carbine. This has nothing to do with profiling at the airport. It is an obvious example of how the IRS targeted political opponents with audits just because of their names and ideals. Pretty lame dude. But go ahead, just ignore it. Act like it never happened, just like Benghazi never happened.
TK, I disagree. The Israelis use radical profiling at El Al Airlines it works beautifully. They haven't had a single incident. Why aren't we using radical profiling on Muslims at airports and drop the PC nonsense?
Whn did you stop beating your dog?
I'm sorry was that a yes or a no?
Since you won't answer, that would be a yes.
Therefore if it's okay to profile people you think might be more likely than others to break the law,
what's YOUR problem with profiling rightwing extremist groups trying to avoid paying taxes?
They are notorious for breaking the law.
For starters the answer is yes.
Second, it is irrelevant as conservative groups do not break the law any more than liberal groups do. Less, as a matter of fact. Who audited ACORN?
There was no finding of anyone avoiding paying taxes and that is not what these fishing expeditions were about.
So other than being wrong, irrelevant and stupid your post was also misinformed. Thanks for playing. There's a t-shirt in the back for you.
Did you or do you support profiling Muslims in airports?
That is a cop out, Carbine. This has nothing to do with profiling at the airport. It is an obvious example of how the IRS targeted political opponents with audits just because of their names and ideals. Pretty lame dude. But go ahead, just ignore it. Act like it never happened, just like Benghazi never happened.
I've already said in one of the first of what will be about a hundred threads you inmates will flood this board with, with all sorts of insane accusations,
that if there was wrongdoing then heads should roll. So fuck off on that subject.
But hypocrisy is fair game on this board. Why do you support profiling in one case and not another?
TK, I disagree. The Israelis use radical profiling at El Al Airlines it works beautifully. They haven't had a single incident. Why aren't we using radical profiling on Muslims at airports and drop the PC nonsense?
I'm sorry was that a yes or a no?
Since you won't answer, that would be a yes.
Therefore if it's okay to profile people you think might be more likely than others to break the law,
what's YOUR problem with profiling rightwing extremist groups trying to avoid paying taxes?
They are notorious for breaking the law.
For starters the answer is yes.
Second, it is irrelevant as conservative groups do not break the law any more than liberal groups do. Less, as a matter of fact. Who audited ACORN?
There was no finding of anyone avoiding paying taxes and that is not what these fishing expeditions were about.
So other than being wrong, irrelevant and stupid your post was also misinformed. Thanks for playing. There's a t-shirt in the back for you.
Post your PROOF that conservative tax exempt organizations have a better record of compliance with the law than do liberal groups.
I want to see that proof.
TK, I disagree. The Israelis use radical profiling at El Al Airlines it works beautifully. They haven't had a single incident. Why aren't we using radical profiling on Muslims at airports and drop the PC nonsense?
Since you're not an American you probably don't understand our Constitution.
That is a cop out, Carbine. This has nothing to do with profiling at the airport. It is an obvious example of how the IRS targeted political opponents with audits just because of their names and ideals. Pretty lame dude. But go ahead, just ignore it. Act like it never happened, just like Benghazi never happened.
I've already said in one of the first of what will be about a hundred threads you inmates will flood this board with, with all sorts of insane accusations,
that if there was wrongdoing then heads should roll. So fuck off on that subject.
But hypocrisy is fair game on this board. Why do you support profiling in one case and not another?
You obviously condone what the IRS did, so what gives you any standing to whine? Lol, I will "fuck off" when I get ready to, you insolent brat.
The thing is, there HAS been wrongdoing, and it is a matter of time before the culprit(s) are identified. I have a good idea as to whom they could be.
I've already said in one of the first of what will be about a hundred threads you inmates will flood this board with, with all sorts of insane accusations,
that if there was wrongdoing then heads should roll. So fuck off on that subject.
But hypocrisy is fair game on this board. Why do you support profiling in one case and not another?
You obviously condone what the IRS did, so what gives you any standing to whine? Lol, I will "fuck off" when I get ready to, you insolent brat.
The thing is, there HAS been wrongdoing, and it is a matter of time before the culprit(s) are identified. I have a good idea as to whom they could be.
What part of 'heads should roll' did you not understand?
Seriously, I would like a detailed answer. That is not a rhetorical question.
You obviously condone what the IRS did, so what gives you any standing to whine? Lol, I will "fuck off" when I get ready to, you insolent brat.
The thing is, there HAS been wrongdoing, and it is a matter of time before the culprit(s) are identified. I have a good idea as to whom they could be.
What part of 'heads should roll' did you not understand?
Seriously, I would like a detailed answer. That is not a rhetorical question.
In what post did you condemn Obama or the IRS for what they did? "Head should roll" is not a sufficient answer. Because from what I'm seeing, you are contradicting that notion as you speak.
TK, I disagree. The Israelis use radical profiling at El Al Airlines it works beautifully. They haven't had a single incident. Why aren't we using radical profiling on Muslims at airports and drop the PC nonsense?
I beg your pardon? I did not issue an opinion on such a thing either way. Are you sure you're quoting the right guy?
I dont see impeaching Obama for this. Bad judgement doesnt rise to high crimes and misdemeanors. On the IRS matter it is entirely possible that he is culpable of just that. But we have to see what washes out.
Using the IRS to target conservatives and the tea party could get him impeached. The obstacle is the DOJ is thoroughly corrupt and covering for Obama. Don't know how they would proceed considering that.
The DOJ does not impeach Obama. The House does. It would be a conflict of interest.
It's President Obama's justice department that's going after the IRS, you idiots.
I know I saw this mentioned somewhere but see no thread on it now.
Does anyone believe that a few local low level IRS employees engaged in systematic harassment of conservative groups? If so I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell. This is bigger than Benghazi.
AP News: AP Exclusive: IRS knew tea party targeted in 2011
Did you or do you support profiling Muslims in airports?
It's President Obama's justice department that's going after the IRS, you idiots.
Really? Post proof of any investigation.
I have you on ignore but periodically look at your posts hoping in vain for some semblence of common sense. But comparing profiling Muslims in airports to invasive IRS audits of conservative groups is way up on the stupid meter. You might be worse than RDean!
The political action committee behind the Tea Party Express (TPE) which already has been slammed as inauthentic and corporate-controlled by rival factions in the Tea Party movement directed almost two thirds of its spending during a recent reporting period back to the Republican consulting firm that created the PAC in the first place.
Our Country Deserves Better (OCDB) spent around $1.33 million from July through November, according to FEC filings examined by TPMmuckraker. Of that sum, a total of $857,122 went to Sacramento-based GOP political consulting firm Russo, Marsh, and Associates, or people associated with it.
OCDB, which built the Tea Party Express, is essentially a Russo, Marsh creation, as weve detailed. The PACs site was registered in July 2008 by Sal Russo, the firms founder. That site also lists Russo as the PACs chief strategist. Tea Party Express fundraising emails, sent by OCDB and obtained by TPMmuckraker, come from another Russo, Marsh employee, Joe Wierzbicki.
But one expert on political action committees told TPMmuckraker it was unusual for a PAC to direct so much spending back to the entity that created it. And the spending details raised hackles among members of the Tea Party Patriots, a rival faction of conservative activists who have denounced TPE as a creature of Republican political professionals that lacks grassroots authenticity. In an email to a Patriots group that was obtained by TPMmuckaker, one TPPer who had examined the filings asked, What would the true grassroots people think if they knew their money is being spent in this manner?
