Intelligence source codenamed "Curveball" admits lying about WMD

[Wicked Jester]

How quickly & conveniently you folks forget-about what he actually did.....

Gee.....no mention of War!!

You've gotta quit relying on Porky Limbaugh for your "quotes".

Yup, I remember... Bill Clinton Attacked Iraq. He bombed the piss out of Bagdad.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEIOtn1wk5g&feature=player_embedded"]President WMDs Attack[/ame]

WOW nice video full of pop up video lies. So clinton bombed the hell out of iraq WMDs in 1998 and W still thought they were there in 2002 but couldn't let the inspectors finish their job to find out they weren't and you guys are so desperate that you are using what you called lies and "waggind the dog" in a lame and desperate attempt to try can claim that W is not responsibile for his choice to invade iraq. LOL

Now that is hilarious

Gee, wasn't it Sadaam himself who spent 12 years repeatedly throwing the inspectors out of the country?

Why yes, it was.

Wasn't it Sadaam himself who fully admitted that he put on a charade of having WMD's and the abilty to produce them?

Why yes, he did. It's all right here:

Interrogator Shares Saddam's Confessions - 60 Minutes - CBS News

Face it, Sadaam is solely responsible for what happened. He, and he alone could have prevented it all. He chose to play games. He chose his fate, and the fate of his people who are now RIGHTFULLY rid of a crazy, murderous thug of a dictator once and for all.

But you keep riding that legless horse of yours, and we'll keep laughing while watching you scratching your head at the fact that the horse isn't going anywhere........Hopefully, one you'll realize that it's akin to nailing fucking JELLO to the wall.

 

[drsmith1072]

Yup, I remember... Bill Clinton Attacked Iraq. He bombed the piss out of Bagdad.

President WMDs Attack

WOW nice video full of pop up video lies. So clinton bombed the hell out of iraq WMDs in 1998 and W still thought they were there in 2002 but couldn't let the inspectors finish their job to find out they weren't and you guys are so desperate that you are using what you called lies and "waggind the dog" in a lame and desperate attempt to try can claim that W is not responsibile for his choice to invade iraq. LOL

Now that is hilarious

Gee, wasn't it Sadaam himself who spent 12 years repeatedly throwing the inspectors out of the country?

Why yes, it was.

Wasn't it Sadaam himself who fully admitted that he put on a charade of having WMD's and the abilty to produce them?

Why yes, he did. It's all right here:

Interrogator Shares Saddam's Confessions - 60 Minutes - CBS News

Face it, Sadaam is solely responsible for what happened. He, and he alone could have prevented it all. He chose to play games. He chose his fate, and the fate of his people who are now RIGHTFULLY rid of a crazy, murderous thug of a dictator once and for all.

But you keep riding that legless horse of yours, and we'll keep laughing while watching you scratching your head at the fact that the horse isn't going anywhere........Hopefully, one you'll realize that it's akin to nailing fucking JELLO to the wall.

and yet the inspectors were on the ground doing their jobs when W told them to leave because he chose to invade. If only he had let them finish their job it could have saved us time money and lives.

So the guy who chose to pull the trigger has NO responsibility?? Really?? W chose to invade iraq based on flimsy intel and went against the UN kicking out their inspectors under the guise of enforcing UN resoltions. This was a war of choice and W is responsible for making that choice. It all about personal responsibility.

 

[JFK_USA]

And water is wet. Bush lied a ton to fight for Daddy.

 

[KissMy]

And water is wet. Bush lied a ton to fight for Daddy.

No, Clinton already avenged Saddam's attack on Bush's daddy by bombing Iraq for exactly that reason. Your JFK hero is the worst lying sack of crap by far killing over 60 million people with his lies. So go fire up another joint flamer & stick to watching cartoons.

 

[drsmith1072]

And water is wet. Bush lied a ton to fight for Daddy.

No, Clinton already avenged Saddam's attack on Bush's daddy by bombing Iraq for exactly that reason. Your JFK hero is the worst lying sack of crap by far killing over 60 million people with his lies. So go fire up another joint flamer & stick to watching cartoons.

Huh?? What are you babbling about?? So when did clinton state that he was bombing iraq to avenge HW?? Did he actually say that or are you making it up??

 

[hortysir]

Blind[/COLOR]Boo;3336303]
This is George "How can I pin 9-11 on Iraq" Bush you're talking about, right?

Care to link/quote any connection, real or implied, that was made between Iraq and 9-11?

 

[KissMy]

And water is wet. Bush lied a ton to fight for Daddy.

No, Clinton already avenged Saddam's attack on Bush's daddy by bombing Iraq for exactly that reason. Your JFK hero is the worst lying sack of crap by far killing over 60 million people with his lies. So go fire up another joint flamer & stick to watching cartoons.

Huh?? What are you babbling about?? So when did clinton state that he was bombing iraq to avenge HW?? Did he actually say that or are you making it up??

If you would read my previous post in this thread you would know. Here is a video of Bill Clinton describing his attack in his own words:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mpWa7wNr5M&feature=related"]Clinton Bombs Iraq 1993[/ame]

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Oh, W obviously did. We will be paying for that stupid decision for a long time.

JimH(alfwit),

Hey idiot, this crappola of blame Dubya has been exposed over, and over, and over....again. and again, and again ....ad infinitum.

ALL the Intelligence Agencies of the Major Countries of the World (except China) stated, on record......and on front pages of the newspapers of the World that they agreed with Clinton's...YES, CLINTON Administration's CIA that the Baghdad Psycho had WMDS.

....And, you were (simply) too-overwhelmed (by alllllll this info), that you forgot to post any-o'-them, right??

 

[Intense]

This Bears Repeating!

 

[Intense]

Looking back at some of the mistakes, The Administration probably chose to invade when it did, because it suspected enough change in support the longer it delayed. When Turkey pulled support at the last minute, it also hurt the Invasion Strategy, leaving an integral part of the Invasion Force stuck in Transports, literally out of the First Phase of the Invasion.

Removing Anyone that was a part of the Iraqi Infrastructure and barring them from participating in Government restructure, disqualified the most educated, intelligent, and experienced from helping restore the Rule of Law. That was a mistake, hopefully one we learned from. The State Department's absence in helping coordinate restructure speaks volumes for the dissent in our own Government.

A Constitution that grants Equal Protection under the Law, which unfortunately has issues with Sharia Law, would have been a foot forward into Modern recognition of Human Rights, Universal Human Rights, Unalienable Rights. A Constitution that had Traits of Sharia, but not limited to It's short comings would have been a reasonable goal.

A position I advocated before it was popular, was either A break up of Iraq into 3 separate Countries, or 3 Separate States, under a Unified Constitution, would even today advance Liberty for all involved. The thought back then, of moving Non-Local Forces to implement security, seems to have the effect of stirring up Incitement, which is what it did do. Containment and dealing with the specific problems and concerns of each region, it would seem, would be better served with a one size fits all approach, which is the down side of Mis Applied Federalist Principles.

 

[BlindBoo]

Blind[/COLOR]Boo;3336303]
This is George "How can I pin 9-11 on Iraq" Bush you're talking about, right?

Care to link/quote any connection, real or implied, that was made between Iraq and 9-11?

Clarke's Take On Terror - 60 Minutes - CBS News

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush administration on Iraq 9/11 link

 

[drsmith1072]

No, Clinton already avenged Saddam's attack on Bush's daddy by bombing Iraq for exactly that reason. Your JFK hero is the worst lying sack of crap by far killing over 60 million people with his lies. So go fire up another joint flamer & stick to watching cartoons.

Huh?? What are you babbling about?? So when did clinton state that he was bombing iraq to avenge HW?? Did he actually say that or are you making it up??

If you would read my previous post in this thread you would know. Here is a video of Bill Clinton describing his attack in his own words:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mpWa7wNr5M&feature=related"]Clinton Bombs Iraq 1993[/ame]

Missed that but ty for posting it again. However, I don't see what you are trying to prove with it?? Clinton bombed iraq so W somehow felt avenged because someone else blew up some buildings?? Is that really what you are trying to say?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Oh yeah, when Bush pushed us to war the party of personal responsibilty wants to spread the blame equally like socialist. Yes, Clinton is at fault, dems are at fault, EVERYONE is at fault equally with the person in charge.

See repubs do believe socialism works

 

[asterism]

Looking back at some of the mistakes, The Administration probably chose to invade when it did, because it suspected enough change in support the longer it delayed. When Turkey pulled support at the last minute, it also hurt the Invasion Strategy, leaving an integral part of the Invasion Force stuck in Transports, literally out of the First Phase of the Invasion.

Removing Anyone that was a part of the Iraqi Infrastructure and barring them from participating in Government restructure, disqualified the most educated, intelligent, and experienced from helping restore the Rule of Law. That was a mistake, hopefully one we learned from. The State Department's absence in helping coordinate restructure speaks volumes for the dissent in our own Government.

A Constitution that grants Equal Protection under the Law, which unfortunately has issues with Sharia Law, would have been a foot forward into Modern recognition of Human Rights, Universal Human Rights, Unalienable Rights. A Constitution that had Traits of Sharia, but not limited to It's short comings would have been a reasonable goal.

A position I advocated before it was popular, was either A break up of Iraq into 3 separate Countries, or 3 Separate States, under a Unified Constitution, would even today advance Liberty for all involved. The thought back then, of moving Non-Local Forces to implement security, seems to have the effect of stirring up Incitement, which is what it did do. Containment and dealing with the specific problems and concerns of each region, it would seem, would be better served with a one size fits all approach, which is the down side of Mis Applied Federalist Principles.

I don't care if Biden was the first one to say so out loud, the 3-state solution was and still is a viable option. Turkey can decide to deal with it if their own problems are exacerbated because of it.

 

[KissMy]

Huh?? What are you babbling about?? So when did clinton state that he was bombing iraq to avenge HW?? Did he actually say that or are you making it up??

If you would read my previous post in this thread you would know. Here is a video of Bill Clinton describing his attack in his own words:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mpWa7wNr5M&feature=related"]Clinton Bombs Iraq 1993[/ame]

Missed that but ty for posting it again. However, I don't see what you are trying to prove with it?? Clinton bombed iraq so W somehow felt avenged because someone else blew up some buildings?? Is that really what you are trying to say?

I know it is hard for you but quit acting like an idiot. You know I was responding to the JFK Idiot:

And water is wet. Bush lied a ton to fight for Daddy.

Clinton bombed Iraq 3 different times for 3 different reasons. The first however was a preemptive & retaliatory war strike on Iraq. Even though Saddam had not attacked anyone, Clinton determined that Saddam planned to attack former president Bush. So Bill Clinton launched a preemptive & retaliatory war strike on Iraq avenging the planned attack on former president Bush.

Bush is getting blamed on here for what Clinton had already done. The war Bush waged against Iraq was what the majority of US citizens wanted to do for 13 years leading up to the Iraq war & especially after 9/11 when the gloves came off. Bill & Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards, the majority of US citizens & congress wanted Bush to send US ground troops to Iraq even if the war took 10 years as Bush said in the his address. Saddam himself told other countries he had WMD's.

So enough with the Bush lied for daddy crap. If Clinton were president on 9/11 we would still have sent troops into Iraq! It was thought to be best option for that country. Our leaders are trying to do what is best & just because you can't understand that does not make it wrong. At that time the republicans also planned the regime change in Egypt that you now see playing out. They assisted the 5 largest rebel groups in Egypt in cooperating with Egypt's military to oust Hosni Mubarak before the 2011 elections in Egypt. Because this was the best option for that country.

 

[shintao]

Man admits to WMD lies that triggered Gulf War (The Guardian)

And he found a President gullible enough to believe him, even when evidence told a different story. Over 5,000 dead US and many more Iraqis. Nearly a Trillion dollars spent on a lie.

"Intelligence source codenamed "Curveball" admits lying about WMD "


Are you sure is wasn't ODDBALL ??

 

[ClosedCaption]

It's ok, trillions lost...thousands dead but pretend whats really breaking America is the unions.

 

[hortysir]

Blind[/color]Boo;3336303]
This is George "How can I pin 9-11 on Iraq" Bush you're talking about, right?

Care to link/quote any connection, real or implied, that was made between Iraq and 9-11?

Clarke's Take On Terror - 60 Minutes - CBS News

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush administration on Iraq 9/11 link

From your own link:

Mr Bush has never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington

Never has anyone stated that Saddam's Iraq had anything to do with 911.


Your first link is a story told by a disgruntled employee, the second is Christian Science Monitor which I never trust for news, and the 3rd is the one that I quoted, sooo........

 

[BlindBoo]

Care to link/quote any connection, real or implied, that was made between Iraq and 9-11?

Clarke's Take On Terror - 60 Minutes - CBS News

The impact of Bush linking 9/11 and Iraq / The Christian Science Monitor - CSMonitor.com

BBC NEWS | Americas | Bush administration on Iraq 9/11 link

From your own link:

Mr Bush has never directly accused the former Iraqi leader of having a hand in the attacks on New York and Washington

Never has anyone stated that Saddam's Iraq had anything to do with 911.


Your first link is a story told by a disgruntled employee, the second is Christian Science Monitor which I never trust for news, and the 3rd is the one that I quoted, sooo........

So you really didn't mean implied but a direct quote where President Bush draws a line from Saddam to al Queda to 9-11 right?

There is a reason why 70% of Americans believed it to be so in March 2003.

You believed didn't you?

 

[drsmith1072]

If you would read my previous post in this thread you would know. Here is a video of Bill Clinton describing his attack in his own words:

Clinton Bombs Iraq 1993

Missed that but ty for posting it again. However, I don't see what you are trying to prove with it?? Clinton bombed iraq so W somehow felt avenged because someone else blew up some buildings?? Is that really what you are trying to say?

I know it is hard for you but quit acting like an idiot.

What are you babbling about. I asked you a simple question and apparently since you couldn't actually answer it you decided to neg rep me call me names including a liar. what did i lie about??

You know I was responding to the JFK Idiot:

And water is wet. Bush lied a ton to fight for Daddy.

Clinton bombed Iraq 3 different times for 3 different reasons. The first however was a preemptive & retaliatory war strike on Iraq. Even though Saddam had not attacked anyone, Clinton determined that Saddam planned to attack former president Bush. So Bill Clinton launched a preemptive & retaliatory war strike on Iraq avenging the planned attack on former president Bush.]

Do you understand what you are saying?? you are saying that Clinton bombed iraq in retaliation for the failed attempt to assassinate HW even as you try to claim that the bombing was preemptive. It can only be one or the other, it can't be both. Way to contradict yourself. How could clinton avenge an event that didn't happen??

Bush is getting blamed on here for what Clinton had already done. The war Bush waged against Iraq was what the majority of US citizens wanted to do for 13 years leading up to the Iraq war & especially after 9/11 when the gloves came off. Bill & Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards, the majority of US citizens & congress wanted Bush to send US ground troops to Iraq even if the war took 10 years as Bush said in the his address. Saddam himself told other countries he had WMD's.

So enough with the Bush lied for daddy crap. If Clinton were president on 9/11 we would still have sent troops into Iraq! It was thought to be best option for that country. Our leaders are trying to do what is best & just because you can't understand that does not make it wrong. At that time the republicans also planned the regime change in Egypt that you now see playing out. They assisted the 5 largest rebel groups in Egypt in cooperating with Egypt's military to oust Hosni Mubarak before the 2011 elections in Egypt. Because this was the best option for that country.

And you have the nerve to call me a liar?? LOL Funny how clinton was attacked by the right throughout his entire term for nation building and yet the core of your argument is that "It was thought to be best option for that country."
So, thanks for the hypocrisy and dishonesty.