In secret court hearing lawyer objected to FBI sifting through NSA data like it was google

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,760
2,040
IN HER FIRST APPEARANCE representing the American public before the top-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2015, Amy Jeffress argued that the FBI is violating the Fourth Amendment by giving agents “virtually unrestricted” access to data from one of the NSA’s largest surveillance programs, which includes an untold amount of communications involving innocent Americans.
In Secret Court Hearing, Lawyer Objected to FBI Sifting Through NSA Data Like it Was Google
“So they’re overstepping, really, the purpose for which the information is collected"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NSA has every key stroke you ever made, and stores it all everything you are, were, family etc. Liberals love it.
 
IN HER FIRST APPEARANCE representing the American public before the top-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in 2015, Amy Jeffress argued that the FBI is violating the Fourth Amendment by giving agents “virtually unrestricted” access to data from one of the NSA’s largest surveillance programs, which includes an untold amount of communications involving innocent Americans.
In Secret Court Hearing, Lawyer Objected to FBI Sifting Through NSA Data Like it Was Google
“So they’re overstepping, really, the purpose for which the information is collected"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NSA has every key stroke you ever made, and stores it all everything you are, were, family etc. Liberals love it.

So do most Conservatives. So I think you could properly say that authoritarians love it.
 
And then the question becomes how much of this is used in behind the scenes attempts to affect the political direction of the country
 

Forum List

Back
Top