Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The “if” is for a court to decide, but your House Clowns were too scared to go to court.If they are all invalid they can all be challenged on that basis.And the Executive Branch has the authority to challenge them, Short Bus Rider.Sure it is. We all know that congress has the authority to issue subpoenas.
Not all of them in one fell swoop. That has never been done. The authority of congress to issue subpoenas is well established.If they are all invalid they can all be challenged on that basis.
Hmm...."If" is the operative word. Certainly those issued after the passage of the House resolution could not be covered by that excuse. Right?
Why?
LOL...
Best Line of the day came from Hakeem Bin What’s His Name:
When asked why The House did not challenge The President on his assertions of Executive Privilege!
“We didn’t challenge executive privilege because the President never exerted executive privilege!”
LMAO!
These people are both stupid, dishonest, desperate and despicable!
Then this Hitler Demings bitch tries to explain why Obama made Ukraine give up its nuclear arsenal right before Obama gave Putin a wink and a nod to take over Crimea and invade Ukraine.
They didn't, dope. Trump's legal team made up excuses for them not to comply with subpoenas. EP was not one of them.
Constitutional law is "made up excuses"? House Dem subpoenas were invalid under the law and House Dems elected not to challenge the White House in court because they knew they would lose.
What "constitutional law" would that be?
The law Dems ignore. A full vote of the House is REQUIRED to grant a committee the authority to issue subpoenas. Pelosi does not have the power to ignore this law wave a wand and give a committee this authority. Hence the subpoenas are invalid. The White House informed House Dems of this, they ignored it.
Omitting facts by Trump's team and cherry-picking House talking points over 95% of the media . .You mean reporting the events that are actually happening? Wow, how dare they!Even PBS and local news outlets are all doing the MSM echo chamber spin.
Yes there is, turd. I have already quoted it"Making excuses" means showing the reason the subpoenas weren't legal. Laws are just "excuses" if they get in the way of the Dim agenda.
Best Line of the day came from Hakeem Bin What’s His Name:
When asked why The House did not challenge The President on his assertions of Executive Privilege!
“We didn’t challenge executive privilege because the President never exerted executive privilege!”
LMAO!
These people are both stupid, dishonest, desperate and despicable!
Then this Hitler Demings bitch tries to explain why Obama made Ukraine give up its nuclear arsenal right before Obama gave Putin a wink and a nod to take over Crimea and invade Ukraine.
They didn't, dope. Trump's legal team made up excuses for them not to comply with subpoenas. EP was not one of them.
That is not a valid reason. There is no law , rule or regulation that requires a full vote in the house to issue subpoenas. Pure nonsense.
The president doesn't get to decide how the House conducts investigations or impeachment.
Contempt of Congress - Wikipedia
As announced in Wilkinson v. United States,[9] a Congressional committee must meet three requirements for its subpoenas to be "legally sufficient." First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;
That is not a law, dope.
From your link:
"Congressional rules empower all its standing committees with the authority to compel witnesses to produce testimony and documents for subjects under its jurisdiction. Committee rules may provide for the full committee to issue a subpoena, or permit subcommittees or the chairman (acting alone or with the ranking member) to issue subpoenas."
The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment.
i don’t believe that you analyzed 100% of the media to get that 95% number so I can’t take you that seriouslyOmitting facts but Trump's team and cherry-picking House talking points over 95% of the media . .You mean reporting the events that are actually happening? Wow, how dare they!Even PBS and local news outlets are all doing the MSM echo chamber spin.
Is that called balanced journalism in your bubbly world ?
If Trump is impeached over this phone call, we should
be allowed to go back and retroactively impeach every president since Carter.
No. Schiff has zero sense of humor like you.If Trump is impeached over this phone call, we should
be allowed to go back and retroactively impeach every president since Carter.
There is no such thing. You are rivaling Schiff's ability to make shit up!
Yes there is, turd. I have already quoted it"Making excuses" means showing the reason the subpoenas weren't legal. Laws are just "excuses" if they get in the way of the Dim agenda.They didn't, dope. Trump's legal team made up excuses for them not to comply with subpoenas. EP was not one of them.
That is not a valid reason. There is no law , rule or regulation that requires a full vote in the house to issue subpoenas. Pure nonsense.
The president doesn't get to decide how the House conducts investigations or impeachment.
Contempt of Congress - Wikipedia
As announced in Wilkinson v. United States,[9] a Congressional committee must meet three requirements for its subpoenas to be "legally sufficient." First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;
That is not a law, dope.
From your link:
"Congressional rules empower all its standing committees with the authority to compel witnesses to produce testimony and documents for subjects under its jurisdiction. Committee rules may provide for the full committee to issue a subpoena, or permit subcommittees or the chairman (acting alone or with the ranking member) to issue subpoenas."
From the CONSTITUTION
The House of Representatives shall choose their speaker and other officers; and shall have the sole power of impeachment.
bolding mine
It clearly states THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, it doesn't state Speaker of the House of Representatives, it doesn't state a House Committee "shall have the sole power of impeachment". Only a the FULL House of Representatives have that power, it is a collective power, not an individual one.
Once the HOUSE of Representatives voted for Impeachment to proceed, THEN the Committee will have the power of Subpoena, because the FULL House of Representatives gave them authority to do so, this is a sterling example of what a REPUBLIC is about.
The Speaker of the House was the one who started the Impeachment Inquiry, she started this all by herself, it was NEVER given a full house floor vote to start it, thus the impeachment process was never legally activated.
The whole mess is a sham and a farce. I am so over it. But it is bringing big bucks into the GOP coffers so thats good.What are your thoughts about how the questions phase of the impeachment trial is going?
he would have talked earlier ,, to late nowIt was a strategy... months in court or pursue in the senate. Bolton went from suing to willing to comply. Looking like a smart move at this point. Wouldn’t you agree?Democrats asked for Bolton as a witnessAre you talking about Bolton being asked to testify? Are you following along, do you want us to slow it down for you?Because SCHIFF DIDNT FOLLOW UP! How is that trumps fault
Huh?
How does one "follow up" on a claim that was never made?
You're confused in your own conversation, dope.
His lawyer said I will sue you
democrats didn’t follow up
WHOS FAULT IS THAT?
Wow, you’re declaring it a loss for the dems?! I’m shocked. That carries as much weight as your mom telling you that youre smart and good looking.I’m already declaring this as a loss for Democrats. Bored with it and Schiff looks desperate!
Schiff is asking you to
“Throw out The Law, Appeals Courts Don’t Matter, Supreme Court Doesn't Matter. Nothing Matters but what we accuse The President of and We Have Supreme Authority Over Everyone!
If you allow the President to assert his Civil Rights, you as The Senate are Obstructing My Impeachment!”
I’m Out!
You’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?he would have talked earlier ,, to late nowIt was a strategy... months in court or pursue in the senate. Bolton went from suing to willing to comply. Looking like a smart move at this point. Wouldn’t you agree?Democrats asked for Bolton as a witnessAre you talking about Bolton being asked to testify? Are you following along, do you want us to slow it down for you?Huh?
How does one "follow up" on a claim that was never made?
You're confused in your own conversation, dope.
His lawyer said I will sue you
democrats didn’t follow up
WHOS FAULT IS THAT?
Me too except for I had a threesome with the prom queen and her runner up... and finished with a 4.2 but who’s countingI dated the prom queen and graduated Suma with a 4.0, loser.
Wow, you’re declaring it a loss for the dems?! I’m shocked. That carries as much weight as your mom telling you that youre smart and good looking.I’m already declaring this as a loss for Democrats. Bored with it and Schiff looks desperate!
Schiff is asking you to
“Throw out The Law, Appeals Courts Don’t Matter, Supreme Court Doesn't Matter. Nothing Matters but what we accuse The President of and We Have Supreme Authority Over Everyone!
If you allow the President to assert his Civil Rights, you as The Senate are Obstructing My Impeachment!”
I’m Out!
We won’t have a president if he is removed every president will be removed for what the other party “ thinks” motives are lolIf Trump is impeached over this phone call, we should
be allowed to go back and retroactively impeach every president since Carter.
Yes there is, turd. I have already quoted it"Making excuses" means showing the reason the subpoenas weren't legal. Laws are just "excuses" if they get in the way of the Dim agenda.
That is not a valid reason. There is no law , rule or regulation that requires a full vote in the house to issue subpoenas. Pure nonsense.
The president doesn't get to decide how the House conducts investigations or impeachment.
Contempt of Congress - Wikipedia
As announced in Wilkinson v. United States,[9] a Congressional committee must meet three requirements for its subpoenas to be "legally sufficient." First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;
That is not a law, dope.
From your link:
"Congressional rules empower all its standing committees with the authority to compel witnesses to produce testimony and documents for subjects under its jurisdiction. Committee rules may provide for the full committee to issue a subpoena, or permit subcommittees or the chairman (acting alone or with the ranking member) to issue subpoenas."
Who's the dope?
Is the constitution not the supreme law of the land, dope.
There's precedent and under our legal system based on English common law, precedent carries weight under the law.
This ain't France, shitforbrains. And if you need to ask about that, don't you'll just look all the more stupid.
LOL...
There's tons of precedent stating that the president must comply with congressional subpoenas as well, dope.
Me too except for I had a threesome with the prom queen and her runner up... and finished with a 4.2 but who’s countingI dated the prom queen and graduated Suma with a 4.0, loser.
Wow, you’re declaring it a loss for the dems?! I’m shocked. That carries as much weight as your mom telling you that youre smart and good looking.I’m already declaring this as a loss for Democrats. Bored with it and Schiff looks desperate!
Schiff is asking you to
“Throw out The Law, Appeals Courts Don’t Matter, Supreme Court Doesn't Matter. Nothing Matters but what we accuse The President of and We Have Supreme Authority Over Everyone!
If you allow the President to assert his Civil Rights, you as The Senate are Obstructing My Impeachment!”
I’m Out!
No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move onYou’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?he would have talked earlier ,, to late nowIt was a strategy... months in court or pursue in the senate. Bolton went from suing to willing to comply. Looking like a smart move at this point. Wouldn’t you agree?Democrats asked for Bolton as a witnessAre you talking about Bolton being asked to testify? Are you following along, do you want us to slow it down for you?
You're confused in your own conversation, dope.
His lawyer said I will sue you
democrats didn’t follow up
WHOS FAULT IS THAT?
what are you scared of... he’s a conservative do you really think he will lie to the senate and risk his freedom for the opposite party? Or are you scared he will tell the truth?
Schiff never found out HE DIDNT FOLLOW UPThe discussion was about executive privilege, dope.The claim was the subpoenas were invalid.Because SCHIFF DIDNT FOLLOW UP! How is that trumps faultThat’s not true it’s a process, democrats never followed up they showed the paper work
Derp... I just watched the Trump team answer. EP was not mentioned.
Huh?
How does one "follow up" on a claim that was never made?
Get up to speed.
