- May 20, 2009
- 144,244
- 66,552
- 2,330
Just wanted to highlight, as I've been doing these past 3+ years, what a horrible decision is was for the Stalinist democrats to go after Trump. Stalinist democrats keep pointed to Trump's casino's financial difficulties and his alleged "mob ties" as "Proof" Hillary should be President or something, - it's really hard to follow their Outrage dujour
In the casino bankruptcies Trump offered his lender partial ownership in the casinos in exchange for reducing their debt and debt service. Easy peasy and not a big deal.
But, did Trump pass up a chance to launder money through the casinos to keep them solvent? Maybe. It's clear that he rejected this "opportunity" Had he taken the bait, Michael Cohen would have been delighted to tell Stalinist democrats about it.
With respect to laundering money, we have to continue to thank Quid Pro Joe for shining a Kleig light on the democrat Party and Mitt Romney's Ukrainian washing machine.
I warned you, repeatedly
In the casino bankruptcies Trump offered his lender partial ownership in the casinos in exchange for reducing their debt and debt service. Easy peasy and not a big deal.
But, did Trump pass up a chance to launder money through the casinos to keep them solvent? Maybe. It's clear that he rejected this "opportunity" Had he taken the bait, Michael Cohen would have been delighted to tell Stalinist democrats about it.
With respect to laundering money, we have to continue to thank Quid Pro Joe for shining a Kleig light on the democrat Party and Mitt Romney's Ukrainian washing machine.
I warned you, repeatedly