If You Agree That Trump Has Presidential Immunity, Then Biden has the Right to Lock Trump Up

Your continual trolling and ad homs give away your inability to compete here.
No. That would be YOU who's unable to compete. At this or pretty much anything else in life. You're just another lying nitwit who'll be crying in November. So GFY.
 
Yep, all you can do is ad hom and troll.

I put this in single syllable words for you.
Oh, the irony. No, you're just too stupid to understand anything. Not a surprise. All you can do is beat Orange Man Bad as you roll towards your entire world crumbling in November. Again, GFY asshole. You're just boring.
 
No it’s not. It’s democrats trying lawfare causing it. The worst fucking thing that could happen for democrats is to get a conviction. That opens the door to any red state prosecuting their leaders for bullshit political reasons. It will come back on you.

Not on me. I am all for it. Let the red states start doing it. What the fuck are they waiting for?
 
Gore wanted votes found when Bush defeated him. Hillary wanted more as well when Trump beat her.
Wanting and directing ware two different things...

Hillary never rang up Election Officials and said them to fine the exact number of votes she needed to win...

You can ask for recounts and mostly the mandated on certain margins...

Gore was asking for recounts and he went to a court to do that...

Sorry you are trying a false equivalence, it utter crap...

You are trying to say that a guy who wants money from a bank is as guilty as sopmeone eho robs it..
 
I think the trump worshippers don't see how trump has shot himself in the foot like Barney Fife. His team is arguing about presidential immunity while Trump is whining about Biden prosecuting his political opposition. If the president has immunity, Biden is the president and Biden can imprison trump and eveybody associated with trump.

TODAY.

Read the full brief asking the Supreme Court to reject Trump’s presidential immunity claim​

Special counsel Jack Smith’s team urged the Supreme Court on Monday night to reject former President Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from prosecution in a case charging him with scheming to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

The brief from prosecutors was submitted just over two weeks before the justices take up the legally untested question of whether an ex-president is shielded from criminal charges for official actions taken in the White House.

Read Special Prosecutor Jack Smith’s full brief to the Supreme Court here:
Doesn't follow at all. Logically you are saying that the Constitution gives certain people rights to violate the Constitution.
You admit that without your stupid reason he can't. So you must be admitting that the law gives the right to do something illegal

Are you dumb in the head.
 
False.


I’m not grouchy and I don’t get touched. Why do you rely so much on dishonesty?
The GA charges are still absurd. And the immunity defense is undetermined yet, you nit wit.
Sure, you have, and sure you are.

You know that the immunity claim by Donald will be thrown out, but if it were accepted as law by SCOTUS that Biden would immediately declare Trump no longer a presidential candidate and put him under house arrest.
 
Sure, you have, and sure you are.
False. And false.
You know that the immunity claim by Donald will be thrown out,

Actually, it may not. But neither of us knows what the SCOTUS will ultimately determine, you twit.
but if it were accepted as law by SCOTUS that Biden would immediately declare Trump no longer a presidential candidate and put him under house arrest.
False. He couldn’t. That’s not even remotely akin to the various built in safeguards already in place.

You are an alarmist and an assclown.
 
False. And false.


Actually, it may not. But neither of us knows what the SCOTUS will ultimately determine, you twit.

False. He couldn’t. That’s not even remotely akin to the various built in safeguards already in place.

You are an alarmist and an assclown.
Actually, it will, by no less than 8-1.

You really have nothing to offer here because of your arrogant ego and poor understanding of the law.
 
Wanting and directing ware two different things...

Hillary never rang up Election Officials and said them to fine the exact number of votes she needed to win...

You can ask for recounts and mostly the mandated on certain margins...

Gore was asking for recounts and he went to a court to do that...

Sorry you are trying a false equivalence, it utter crap...

You are trying to say that a guy who wants money from a bank is as guilty as sopmeone eho robs it..
How many votes did Trump get? By asking? Actually Trump did what Gore did and yes even Hillary.
 
Actually, it will, by no less than 8-1.

Thanks for your ignorant guesswork, Nostradumbass.
You really have nothing to offer here because of your arrogant ego and poor understanding of the law.
My understanding of the law is vastly superior to yours. You substitute ignorant guesswork and bloviation for any knowledge whatsoever.

The SCOTUS previously held that the President has and needs absolute immunity from civil liability for his official actions made within the “outer perimeter” of official Presidential duties.

All Trump is seeking is that the SCOTUS extend that immunity to criminal prosecutions for the same reasons, upon the same rationale and to the same extent as the immunity from civil liability.

Even a dipshit like you could understand all of this if you bothered to read and if you had any ability to then comprehend what you read.
 

Forum List

Back
Top