If we selectively bred people with highest percentage of Neanderthal DNA over generations.

[RandomPoster]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

 

[konradv]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

 

[konradv]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

Neandertals where more sophisticated than most people think.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

Neandertals where more sophisticated than most people think.

Neanderthals Didn't Die Out; They Were Killed Off. That Is Our Duty to Evolutionary Progress.

Depending on whether the anthropologist is a Whitey Hating Whitey misfit and a total mind-slave to bitter academic Department Heads, fossil evidence can be misinterpreted because the false prestige of the universities makes the brainwashed public give such escapist bookworms the benefit of the doubt. The Neanderthals were no better than existentially dangerous and totally unfit wild animals.

 

[konradv]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

Neandertals where more sophisticated than most people think.

Neanderthals Didn't Die Out; They Were Killed Off. That Is Our Duty to Evolutionary Progress.

Depending on whether the anthropologist is a Whitey Hating Whitey misfit and a total mind-slave to bitter academic Department Heads, fossil evidence can be misinterpreted because the false prestige of the universities makes the brainwashed public give such escapist bookworms the benefit of the doubt. The Neanderthals were no better than existentially dangerous and totally unfit wild animals.

What a way to talk about your relatives!!! Remember, if you're of European extraction, the % is higher than most other groups.

As much as 2.6% of your DNA is from Neanderthals. This is what it's doing - Los Angeles Times

 

[RandomPoster]

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

Neandertals where more sophisticated than most people think.

Neanderthals Didn't Die Out; They Were Killed Off. That Is Our Duty to Evolutionary Progress.

Depending on whether the anthropologist is a Whitey Hating Whitey misfit and a total mind-slave to bitter academic Department Heads, fossil evidence can be misinterpreted because the false prestige of the universities makes the brainwashed public give such escapist bookworms the benefit of the doubt. The Neanderthals were no better than existentially dangerous and totally unfit wild animals.

What a way to talk about your relatives!!! Remember, if you're of European extraction, the % is higher than most other groups.

As much as 2.6% of your DNA is from Neanderthals. This is what it's doing - Los Angeles Times

Scientists are now saying between 1.5-4% for some groups.

Scientists to grow 'mini-brains' using Neanderthal DNA

Besides having larger brains, Neanderthals made the first known boats, first known glue, as well as many types of bone tools. The first evidence of Cro-Magnons using tar is AFTER they travelled to Europe. Scientists are saying that Neanderthal tools were at least, if not more complex than those of Cro-Magnons of the time. Their artwork was not as well developed and it is suspected that they were less social. So, Neanderthals were better at important things and Cro-Magnons were better at making beads and socializing and silly stuff like that. It is now believed that because of the harsh climate they were adapted to, they were far less numerous than Cro-Magnons and were simply absorbed into the gene pool.

Evidence suggests Neanderthals took to boats before modern humans

How Neanderthals Made First Glue From Tar To Make Stronger Weapons

Neanderthals were not inferior to modern humans, study finds

"The widely held notion that Neanderthals were dimwitted and that their inferior intelligence allowed them to be driven to extinction by the much brighter ancestors of modern humans is not supported by scientific evidence, according to a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder."

""Researchers were comparing Neanderthals not to their contemporaries on other continents but to their successors," Villa said. "It would be like comparing the performance of Model T Fords, widely used in America and Europe in the early part of the last century, to the performance of a modern-day Ferrari and conclude that Henry Ford was cognitively inferior to Enzo Ferrari."

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

Neandertals where more sophisticated than most people think.

Neanderthals Didn't Die Out; They Were Killed Off. That Is Our Duty to Evolutionary Progress.

Depending on whether the anthropologist is a Whitey Hating Whitey misfit and a total mind-slave to bitter academic Department Heads, fossil evidence can be misinterpreted because the false prestige of the universities makes the brainwashed public give such escapist bookworms the benefit of the doubt. The Neanderthals were no better than existentially dangerous and totally unfit wild animals.

What a way to talk about your relatives!!! Remember, if you're of European extraction, the % is higher than most other groups.

As much as 2.6% of your DNA is from Neanderthals. This is what it's doing - Los Angeles Times

Scientists are now saying between 1.5-4% for some groups.

Scientists to grow 'mini-brains' using Neanderthal DNA

Besides having larger brains, Neanderthals made the first known boats, first known glue, as well as many types of bone tools. The first evidence of Cro-Magnons using tar is AFTER they travelled to Europe. Scientists are saying that Neanderthal tools were at least, if not more complex than those of Cro-Magnons of the time. Their artwork was not as well developed and it is suspected that they were less social. So, Neanderthals were better at important things and Cro-Magnons were better at making beads and socializing and silly stuff like that. It is now believed that because of the harsh climate they were adapted to, they were far less numerous than Cro-Magnons and were simply absorbed into the gene pool.

Evidence suggests Neanderthals took to boats before modern humans

How Neanderthals Made First Glue From Tar To Make Stronger Weapons

Neanderthals were not inferior to modern humans, study finds

"The widely held notion that Neanderthals were dimwitted and that their inferior intelligence allowed them to be driven to extinction by the much brighter ancestors of modern humans is not supported by scientific evidence, according to a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder."

""Researchers were comparing Neanderthals not to their contemporaries on other continents but to their successors," Villa said. "It would be like comparing the performance of Model T Fords, widely used in America and Europe in the early part of the last century, to the performance of a modern-day Ferrari and conclude that Henry Ford was cognitively inferior to Enzo Ferrari."

Feralphilia

Decadent academic nerds, inferior themselves in manhood and any kind of deep understanding of the world, think they are getting even with the common-sense society that rejected them by glorifying all unfit humanoid species.

 

[Old Rocks]

Damn Sage, I didn't think that they could get any dumber than Crusader Frank, but you have just proven me wrong. As someone with the upper amount of Neanderthal DNA, I am quite willing to bet that at 75, I am physically and mentally superior to you. LOL

 

[Old Rocks]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

Actually, I think the Neanderthals would disavow any relationship with these two turds.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Size isn't everything. The prefrontal cortex is what counts.

Neandertals where more sophisticated than most people think.

Neanderthals Didn't Die Out; They Were Killed Off. That Is Our Duty to Evolutionary Progress.

Depending on whether the anthropologist is a Whitey Hating Whitey misfit and a total mind-slave to bitter academic Department Heads, fossil evidence can be misinterpreted because the false prestige of the universities makes the brainwashed public give such escapist bookworms the benefit of the doubt. The Neanderthals were no better than existentially dangerous and totally unfit wild animals.

Neanderthals were own the way out before Homo Sapiens even appeared in Europe. Changing climate and competition finished the job.

 

[MarkDuffy]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

No. The what you call Neandertal DNA is DNA that has not been replaced by "modern" DNA. The original Neandertal DNA for most of the genome is gone forever.

In the race for selection, their DNA lost.

 

[Asclepias]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

I think it's already been done.

You do know that Neandertals brains were larger than Homo Sapiens ?

Yeah the only problem was that the space was used primarily for vision instead of thinking.

 

[Rosy]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

There would be changes, I doubt if you could recreate a true Neanderthal because some genes are dominant and those human dominant genes would have wiped out the corresponding Neanderthal genes. On the other hand we all have so called junk DNA that is not coded for, the possibility exist that this is a library that holds everything that we ever were, for the purpose of reverting if the environment reverted somehow.

 

[Tax Man]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

We already have them! Just look at conservatives in the south east of America.

 

[Asclepias]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

Nope. You cant make a dog a wolf by breeding dogs that have a little wolf in them over and over again. All you will wind up with is a inbred dog with hip dysplasia

 

[Rosy]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

Nope. You cant make a dog a wolf by breeding dogs that have a little wolf in them over and over again. All you will wind up with is a inbred dog with hip dysplasia

I think that you might be wrong, as all the Wolf DNA is still there, this would not just be breeding though, the dogs would need to survive in the wild where nature would kill all the weak as it always does.. Bye the way there is no such thing as dog DNA, as dogs are wolves, same DNA same species

 

[Asclepias]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

Nope. You cant make a dog a wolf by breeding dogs that have a little wolf in them over and over again. All you will wind up with is a inbred dog with hip dysplasia

I think that you might be wrong, as all the Wolf DNA is still there, this would not just be breeding though, the dogs would need to survive in the wild where nature would kill all the weak as it always does.. Bye the way there is no such thing as dog DNA, as dogs are wolves, same DNA same species

No dogs are a subspecies of wolves. Dogs have slightly different DNA than wolves. Thats because dogs have been bred with other canines like foxes, coyotes, dholes, and jackals. Dogs are wolves closest relatives but there is some DNA difference. That DNA difference is what makes wolves wild. Most dogs have no clue how to survive in the wild and would starve to death without some human intervention before they learned. I used that analogy to make a point. Dogs and wolves are more similar than Neanderthals and humans. If you cant turn a dog population into wolves in terms of appearance, behavior etc then you could never recreate a neanderthal from say europeans that only have at most 4% neanderthal DNA.

 

[Rosy]

If we selectively bred people with the highest percentages of Neanderthal DNA, could we keep selecting for higher and higher percentages in order to re-create Neanderthals or at least people with much higher percentages over a long period of time?

Nope. You cant make a dog a wolf by breeding dogs that have a little wolf in them over and over again. All you will wind up with is a inbred dog with hip dysplasia

I think that you might be wrong, as all the Wolf DNA is still there, this would not just be breeding though, the dogs would need to survive in the wild where nature would kill all the weak as it always does.. Bye the way there is no such thing as dog DNA, as dogs are wolves, same DNA same species

No dogs are a subspecies of wolves. Dogs have slightly different DNA than wolves. Thats because dogs have been bred with other canines like foxes, coyotes, dholes, and jackals. Dogs are wolves closest relatives but there is some DNA difference. That DNA difference is what makes wolves wild. Most dogs have no clue how to survive in the wild and would starve to death without some human intervention before they learned. I used that analogy to make a point. Dogs and wolves are more similar than Neanderthals and humans. If you cant turn a dog population into wolves in terms of appearance, behavior etc then you could never recreate a neanderthal from say europeans that only have at most 4% neanderthal DNA.

Dogs are not a subspecies. They are genetically the same and as such can interbreed perfectly

In fact there are no wolf dog hybrids because hybrids require two species