If Trump is working with Russia, why did he give Saudi's those weapons to keep russia in check?

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,985
52,273
2,290
Here is a piece showing that the democrats plan to attack Trump using Russia is stupid and a lie.........

Huge Arms Sale to Saudis Makes Trump-Russia Collusion Ludicrous

It won't, but if anything should put paid forever to the tedious Trump-Russia collusion meme that dominates our media as nothing since Monica Lewinsky, it should be the billion-dollar arms deal just brokered by our president with Saudi Arabia.

Nothing could be worse for Russia. Indeed it's disastrous for them, but you won't hear word one to that effect from the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, etc. They have bet their diminishing houses that Trump or one or two of his people said something equivocal on a phone call to a Russky or got paid too much for a speech. In their unresolved anger cum geriatric liberal orthodoxy, they live in an alternative universe divorced from reality.

Why? It should be obvious but I'll state it anyway. Not very long ago Ronald Reagan built up U.S. armaments not to go to war with the Soviet Union, but to bankrupt it out of existence. It worked.

The same thing is going on here, as anyone with the proverbial pulse should notice. Selling three hundred and fifty billion in advanced weaponry to Saudi Arabia is not just aimed at the obvious target -- Iran. It is also aimed at Iran's big brother Russia. And there is no way that relatively impoverished oligarchy can possibly keep up, not in the long run anyway. They don't have the rubles.
 
Here is a piece showing that the democrats plan to attack Trump using Russia is stupid and a lie.........

Huge Arms Sale to Saudis Makes Trump-Russia Collusion Ludicrous

It won't, but if anything should put paid forever to the tedious Trump-Russia collusion meme that dominates our media as nothing since Monica Lewinsky, it should be the billion-dollar arms deal just brokered by our president with Saudi Arabia.

Nothing could be worse for Russia. Indeed it's disastrous for them, but you won't hear word one to that effect from the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, etc. They have bet their diminishing houses that Trump or one or two of his people said something equivocal on a phone call to a Russky or got paid too much for a speech. In their unresolved anger cum geriatric liberal orthodoxy, they live in an alternative universe divorced from reality.

Why? It should be obvious but I'll state it anyway. Not very long ago Ronald Reagan built up U.S. armaments not to go to war with the Soviet Union, but to bankrupt it out of existence. It worked.

The same thing is going on here, as anyone with the proverbial pulse should notice. Selling three hundred and fifty billion in advanced weaponry to Saudi Arabia is not just aimed at the obvious target -- Iran. It is also aimed at Iran's big brother Russia. And there is no way that relatively impoverished oligarchy can possibly keep up, not in the long run anyway. They don't have the rubles.
Careful. You're going to make some LIB's heads explode by asking such logical obvious questions.
 
Here is a piece showing that the democrats plan to attack Trump using Russia is stupid and a lie.........

LOL- Saudi Arabia is not going to do anything to keep Russia in check.

By the way- Trump did okay in Saudi Arabia.

So much for your hope he was going to declare jihad against all Islam there.
 
Nothing could be worse for Russia. .

Just another arms deal with Saudi Arabia.

I am glad that American companies got the deal rather than Russian companies- but Russian companies will probably sell to Iran.
 

Forum List

Back
Top