If Sleep Deprivation is now to be known as torture, what is cutting off fingers and the like?

[kaz]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well according to the lefties on this board everything you do is torture.

Who said that?

Said it? Or "irrefutably demonstrated it" throughout this and every other of the innumerable threads on the subject?

Who here has said that offering privileges in exchange for information is torture?

No one that I know of... but why the question? As no one here has claimed that anyone has 'said': offering privileges in exchange for information is torture. What you have said, is that inducing discomfort where information was withheld and there existed a critical need for that information, was torture.

In truth, using your would-be 'reasoning', the inevitable result is anything can be defined as torture. The Anti-theists are implying that someone wishing that they 'have a Merry Christmas', is torture. Such is the discomfort caused by being wished to have a Merry Christmas, that the secular humanists are working to remove the phrase from the Western lexicon.

Which is in keeping with Islam, the political allies of you of the Secular Humanist, Relativist Cult.

The question is because the fat cow Claudette claimed that liberals call everything torture.

But back to the adult discussion:

If 7 days of sleep deprivation is NOT torture, how many days is?

Give us the number of days at which sleep deprivation reaches your definition of torture.

 

[kaz]

Yeah. Your point blows.

Your attitude blows. We have not been attacked because we had to trade our privacy for security and accept a vast homeland security/NSA domestic spying network in our country but that's another topic where republicans fucked us.

Yet another difference between libertarians and liberal so called social libertarians. We apply our standards to everyone. You apply your standards to Republicans. We mean it. You want partisan attacks to get more handouts. Entirely different things.

 

[NYcarbineer]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Who says that?

 

[Skylar]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Who says that?

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

 

[kaz]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Who says that?

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

LOL, turn on your ears, not just your mouth.

 

[Skylar]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Who says that?

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

LOL, turn on your ears, not just your mouth.

Oh, my ears are wide open. And the crystalline silence that followed NY's question is deafening.

'Who says that'?

 

[kaz]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Who says that?

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

LOL, turn on your ears, not just your mouth.

Oh, my ears are wide open. And the crystalline silence that followed NY's question is deafening.

'Who says that'?

Why? What did he say? He's one of three posters I have on ignore.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

... which generally refers to the US Constitution.

What did you think I was referring to.....the University of Southern California?

I highlighted the relevant points for ya, it should help...

 

[Skylar]

... which generally refers to the US Constitution.

What did you think I was referring to.....the University of Southern California?

I highlighted the relevant points for ya, it should help...

Type 'USC' into google. You'll get the University of Southern California....and then the US Code. And then the US Code again. And then again. And then again. And then again. And then again. You've got to go 28 pages into Google before you get your first mention of the Constitution.

USC generally refers to the United States Code if we're talking about law. Folks referring to the Constitution generally refer to it as the Constitution. If they use an acronym, its COTUS for Constitution of the United States. And hardly anyone uses that. Until your blunder, I'd never seen anyone haplessly interpret USC as meaning the Constitution of the United States.

Ever.

And since I've established beyond any doubt that the USC most definitely does include mention of torture and a rather specific definition, and that definition absolutely matches my description and has zero mention of any of the 'permanent damage' nonsense that Rabbi made up.....

.......my point stands pristinely uncontested.

 

[Skylar]

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Who says that?

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

LOL, turn on your ears, not just your mouth.

Oh, my ears are wide open. And the crystalline silence that followed NY's question is deafening.

'Who says that'?

Why? What did he say? He's one of three posters I have on ignore.

Then turn on your ears and not just your mouth. As your ignorance is quite willful.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

That's why liberals want to use the same word, so then they can say we are the same as Saddam Hussein because we "torture" like he did. They are juveniles.

Exactly. I literally posted up video of the Socialist Iraqi Regimes typical torture of prisoners and the Left ran to have the videos REMOVED!

So they're not just juveniles, they're deceptive, fraudulent, ignorant, foolish people, destined to never be anything BUT juveniles. In short, they're quite simply: the personification of Evil.

 

[LeftofLeft]

You have been given numerous links to the legal definition of torture and the various types of methods that qualify as torture in many threads on this subject. You seem obsessed with torture, but unwilling or unable to comprehend the basic definition of what torture is. There are others following in your dopey way of thinking and refusal to confront reality, but like previously stated, you seem obsessed with being stupid and uninformed.

One form of torture is a woman baring her tits to you while a German Shepherd barks at you. To others, that is a hell of a fantasy.

 

[kaz]

Who says that?

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

LOL, turn on your ears, not just your mouth.

Oh, my ears are wide open. And the crystalline silence that followed NY's question is deafening.

'Who says that'?

Why? What did he say? He's one of three posters I have on ignore.

Then turn on your ears and not just your mouth. As your ignorance is quite willful.

You didn't catch it either, huh. Let me know when you figure it out.

 

[Skylar]

The hypothetical liberal they made up?

LOL, turn on your ears, not just your mouth.

Oh, my ears are wide open. And the crystalline silence that followed NY's question is deafening.

'Who says that'?

Why? What did he say? He's one of three posters I have on ignore.

Then turn on your ears and not just your mouth. As your ignorance is quite willful.

You didn't catch it either, huh. Let me know when you figure it out.

Nope. I read it. I'm looking at it right now.

You have willfully and intentionally ignored the very question you can't answer. Turn on your ears and not just your mouth. If you want to see the question, look at it.

Its so simple. And yet it completely confounds you.

 

[Claudette]

Well according to the lefties on this board everything you do is torture.

Who said that?

Said it? Or "irrefutably demonstrated it" throughout this and every other of the innumerable threads on the subject?

Who here has said that offering privileges in exchange for information is torture?

No one that I know of... but why the question? As no one here has claimed that anyone has 'said': offering privileges in exchange for information is torture. What you have said, is that inducing discomfort where information was withheld and there existed a critical need for that information, was torture.

In truth, using your would-be 'reasoning', the inevitable result is anything can be defined as torture. The Anti-theists are implying that someone wishing that they 'have a Merry Christmas', is torture. Such is the discomfort caused by being wished to have a Merry Christmas, that the secular humanists are working to remove the phrase from the Western lexicon.

Which is in keeping with Islam, the political allies of you of the Secular Humanist, Relativist Cult.

The question is because the fat cow Claudette claimed that liberals call everything torture.

But back to the adult discussion:

If 7 days of sleep deprivation is NOT torture, how many days is?

Give us the number of days at which sleep deprivation reaches your definition of torture.

Fat cow? Guess that make you an ignorant asshole.

You lefties think everything is torture and you care more about what some other country might think of you than actually getting intel to save American lives.

If things were left to you imbeciles we would never get any intel about anything because, hey, we might hurt someones feelings and god forbid we "torture" them.

They will certainly tell us all we need to know to protect our country. According to you idiots anyway.

 

[The Rabbi]

... which generally refers to the US Constitution.

What did you think I was referring to.....the University of Southern California?

I highlighted the relevant points for ya, it should help...

Type 'USC' into google. You'll get the University of Southern California....and then the US Code. And then the US Code again. And then again. And then again. And then again. And then again. You've got to go 28 pages into Google before you get your first mention of the Constitution.

USC generally refers to the United States Code if we're talking about law. Folks referring to the Constitution generally refer to it as the Constitution. If they use an acronym, its COTUS for Constitution of the United States. And hardly anyone uses that. Until your blunder, I'd never seen anyone haplessly interpret USC as meaning the Constitution of the United States.

Ever.

And since I've established beyond any doubt that the USC most definitely does include mention of torture and a rather specific definition, and that definition absolutely matches my description and has zero mention of any of the 'permanent damage' nonsense that Rabbi made up.....

.......my point stands pristinely uncontested.

Except you failed to read Bybee's memo where he shows that "severe" must have a specific meaning and adduces itmeans producing permanent damage.
You fail because you are both lazy and ignorant.

 

[jon_berzerk]

If we're going to call 'stress' torture, we're going to need a new word to convey what we used to call torture.

Because they're not the same...

Which means that we can't use stress to convey discomfort... so what word should be used to convey THAT?

Seems that once again, allowing the intellectually less fortunate to speak, causes chaos... .

Are we sure that this is a good idea?

it doesnt matter

you just have to make sure they dont make it off the battlefield

destroy them out where they stand with a drone

if it means wiping out a few innocent babies and women along the way

so be it

 

[zeke]

destroy them out where they stand with a drone

if it means wiping out a few innocent babies and women along the way

Now how is it that you KNOW that those women and children were innocent? You do know that Muslim women are raising their sons to become terrorists. And that they support their terrorist men. So what part of their supplying future terrorists and supporting existing terrorists makes them innocent?

 

[jon_berzerk]

destroy them out where they stand with a drone

if it means wiping out a few innocent babies and women along the way

Now how is it that you KNOW that those women and children were innocent? You do know that Muslim women are raising their sons to become terrorists. And that they support their terrorist men. So what part of their supplying future terrorists and supporting existing terrorists makes them innocent?

who the fuck cares

let god sort it out