Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually it was only about 14 months from the death of Scalia to the nomination of Gorsuch. As you recall, the nuclear option was dropped in favor of a simple majority because Democrats wanted to filibuster over the shabby treatment of Garland by Republicans. But my original point is that there was no hurry by Republicans at that time. A position I am certain would have their hair on fire if such a tactic had been pulled by a Democrat.Why? SCOTUS worked with 8 judges for a couple years when Republicans refused to even consider a candidate for partisan reasons. I don't recall your need for speed then.I don’t think she’s alive but I think it’s time we find out! We need a new judge!
Two years, when was that specifically? Dates and reason, please.
This is the problem with living under a 230+ year old business plan.
Why?
Seriously?
NOT surprised you have no answer. You just enjoy being a Troll!
No, the business plan is fine.This is the problem with living under a 230+ year old business plan.
The problem is conservatives making our rights and protected liberties casualties of political war.
Actually it was only about 14 months from the death of Scalia to the nomination of Gorsuch. As you recall, the nuclear option was dropped in favor of a simple majority because Democrats wanted to filibuster over the shabby treatment of Garland by Republicans. But my original point is that there was no hurry by Republicans at that time. A position I am certain would have their hair on fire if such a tactic had been pulled by a Democrat.
No.
It’s not fine.
Can we just forget the politics for a second?
We have justices who cannot show up for work due to medical issues. And there is next to nothing that can be done to remove her from her seat as long as she maintains a pulse rate. In 100% of the companies, charities, churches, etc..., across the nation, the other members of those groups would be meeting to see how best to address the leadership having this vacancy addressed. And they should….because that is what responsible companies, charities, and churches would do.
As a nation, we’re ignoring the obvious that the silence of the constitution needs to be addressed. It’s the same document that allowed a vacancy on the same court, by the way…for what, 8 months when the Senate simply refused to do it’s duty. How did that happen? Because in 1787 the framers never once considered that the Senate would simply decide that they were not going to go to work. And the nation suffered during those months.
This is the problem with living under a 230+ year old business plan.
I'm not one to believe in conspiracy theories, but there's this...
"Whistleblower: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is “Deathly Ill” And In A “Medically Induced Coma” – Fears “Massive Unrest” Once Public Finds Out The Truth"
Whistleblower: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is "Deathly Ill" And In A "Medically Induced Coma" - Fears "Massive Unrest" Once Public Finds Out The Truth - The Clover Chronicle
I'm not one to believe in conspiracy theories, but there's this...
"Whistleblower: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is “Deathly Ill” And In A “Medically Induced Coma” – Fears “Massive Unrest” Once Public Finds Out The Truth"
Whistleblower: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Is "Deathly Ill" And In A "Medically Induced Coma" - Fears "Massive Unrest" Once Public Finds Out The Truth - The Clover Chronicle
If the Clover Chronicle says so it must be true
No.
It’s not fine.
Can we just forget the politics for a second?
We have justices who cannot show up for work due to medical issues. And there is next to nothing that can be done to remove her from her seat as long as she maintains a pulse rate. In 100% of the companies, charities, churches, etc..., across the nation, the other members of those groups would be meeting to see how best to address the leadership having this vacancy addressed. And they should….because that is what responsible companies, charities, and churches would do.
As a nation, we’re ignoring the obvious that the silence of the constitution needs to be addressed. It’s the same document that allowed a vacancy on the same court, by the way…for what, 8 months when the Senate simply refused to do it’s duty. How did that happen? Because in 1787 the framers never once considered that the Senate would simply decide that they were not going to go to work. And the nation suffered during those months.
I'm sorry, but I haven't noticed the collapse of our nation.
Bottom line, what is your point.
This is the problem with living under a 230+ year old business plan.
That's what they gave us an amendment process for
No.
It’s not fine.
Can we just forget the politics for a second?
We have justices who cannot show up for work due to medical issues. And there is next to nothing that can be done to remove her from her seat as long as she maintains a pulse rate. In 100% of the companies, charities, churches, etc..., across the nation, the other members of those groups would be meeting to see how best to address the leadership having this vacancy addressed. And they should….because that is what responsible companies, charities, and churches would do.
As a nation, we’re ignoring the obvious that the silence of the constitution needs to be addressed. It’s the same document that allowed a vacancy on the same court, by the way…for what, 8 months when the Senate simply refused to do it’s duty. How did that happen? Because in 1787 the framers never once considered that the Senate would simply decide that they were not going to go to work. And the nation suffered during those months.
I'm sorry, but I haven't noticed the collapse of our nation.
Bottom line, what is your point.
I'm sorry but the litmus test for appropriate and inappropriate behavior isn't the "collapse of our nation". Tomorrow, the Seante could pass a rule that every bill gets passed if it gets one vote OR it could pass a rule that all bills must have unanimous consent to get passed. The House could pass a rule where they are in session for 1 day. They could a
This is the problem with living under a 230+ year old business plan.
That's what they gave us an amendment process for
Yep. I know.
Do YOU think we have a constitution that is built--in it's current verbiage--for 2019 given the political bullshit practiced by both sides? Again, leave your politics out of it. The Senate has shown that the first consideration is who gets to appoint a justice; not if the court is staffed or not. Again, we have the House inviting then dis-inviting the President to give what has commonly become accepted as a yearly state of the union address based on nothing but politics and some bullshit about security. We have a Supreme Court whose justices could keep their seats based on nothing other than their ability to maintain a pulse; meaning that a brain dead justice could still theorhetically hold on to their seat since their heart is being kept going by machines.
Yes, I know there is an amendment process.
The question is; do you think the document we have now is built to with stand the loopholes that are being exploited by all involved?
So, she has survived two of the most aggressive and deadly cancers that are -pancreatic and lung- with no remaining signs.
So, she has survived two of the most aggressive and deadly cancers that are -pancreatic and lung- with no remaining signs.
Really?
I'm sorry but the litmus test for appropriate and inappropriate behavior isn't the "collapse of our nation". Tomorrow, the Seante could pass a rule that every bill gets passed if it gets one vote OR it could pass a rule that all bills must have unanimous consent to get passed. The House could pass a rule where they are in session for 1 day. They could a
Do YOU think we have a constitution that is built--in it's current verbiage--for 2019 given the political bullshit practiced by both sides? Again, leave your politics out of it. The Senate has shown that the first consideration is who gets to appoint a justice; not if the court is staffed or not. Again, we have the House inviting then dis-inviting the President to give what has commonly become accepted as a yearly state of the union address based on nothing but politics and some bullshit about security. We have a Supreme Court whose justices could keep their seats based on nothing other than their ability to maintain a pulse; meaning that a brain dead justice could still theorhetically hold on to their seat since their heart is being kept going by machines.
Yes, I know there is an amendment process.
The question is; do you think the document we have now is built to with stand the loopholes that are being exploited by all involved?
If it turns out she is deceased, I expect that there may be rioting in the streets knowing that Trump will get to replace her.
No.
It’s not fine.
Can we just forget the politics for a second?
We have justices who cannot show up for work due to medical issues. And there is next to nothing that can be done to remove her from her seat as long as she maintains a pulse rate. In 100% of the companies, charities, churches, etc..., across the nation, the other members of those groups would be meeting to see how best to address the leadership having this vacancy addressed. And they should….because that is what responsible companies, charities, and churches would do.
As a nation, we’re ignoring the obvious that the silence of the constitution needs to be addressed. It’s the same document that allowed a vacancy on the same court, by the way…for what, 8 months when the Senate simply refused to do it’s duty. How did that happen? Because in 1787 the framers never once considered that the Senate would simply decide that they were not going to go to work. And the nation suffered during those months.
I'm sorry, but I haven't noticed the collapse of our nation.
Bottom line, what is your point.
I'm sorry but the litmus test for appropriate and inappropriate behavior isn't the "collapse of our nation". Tomorrow, the Seante could pass a rule that every bill gets passed if it gets one vote OR it could pass a rule that all bills must have unanimous consent to get passed. The House could pass a rule where they are in session for 1 day. They could a
This is the problem with living under a 230+ year old business plan.
That's what they gave us an amendment process for
Yep. I know.
Do YOU think we have a constitution that is built--in it's current verbiage--for 2019 given the political bullshit practiced by both sides? Again, leave your politics out of it. The Senate has shown that the first consideration is who gets to appoint a justice; not if the court is staffed or not. Again, we have the House inviting then dis-inviting the President to give what has commonly become accepted as a yearly state of the union address based on nothing but politics and some bullshit about security. We have a Supreme Court whose justices could keep their seats based on nothing other than their ability to maintain a pulse; meaning that a brain dead justice could still theorhetically hold on to their seat since their heart is being kept going by machines.
Yes, I know there is an amendment process.
The question is; do you think the document we have now is built to with stand the loopholes that are being exploited by all involved?
The only reason why they get away with some of that stuff is because the American people let them get away with it. Politics have become a team sport now. The vast majority of people don’t seem to care about what’s best for the country as a whole anymore, only what’s best for their team.
