Laugh like hell and vote for an interesting third party candidate or write in "None of The Above".
A vote no more wasted than casting one for either of those proposed.
At least a protest vote because:
1. Voting for the lesser of evils is still voting for evil.
2. Not voting demonstrates disinterest and negate a person's right to bitch.
that is so wrong. staying home or voting 3rd party always helps the worst of the primary party candidates. Want HRC to be president? vote 3rd party or stay home.
while you are at it, look up the word 'lessor', as in lessor of two evils.
In theory, but that all depends on what you define as "the worst".
For example, I doubt in all honesty, that Mitt Romney would have been all that much better.
The difference is, at least without me voting for him, I can safely and proudly say, that the insanity that's going on for the last 5 years, isn't my fault, because I didn't vote for him.
IF he'd been elected, he would have done all the same things, and everyone would be saying "you voted for him!", and they'd be right.
You give me a real alternative, and I'll really vote for him.
You give me 'left-wing nut job" and "left-wing nut job jr.", and no... sorry. I'm not going to vote for your left-wing nut job, over the other left-wing nut job, just because you think yours is the 'jr. nut job".
I'll vote for the constitutionalist party, just like I did last time. The wasted vote, is the vote for someone you know you already disagree with. That's why we've had such crappy choices for the last two elections.