Bush92
GHBush1992
- May 23, 2014
- 34,808
- 10,704
- 1,400
How would the Cuban Missile Crisis have turned out?
Three Men Go to War | PBS
Three Men Go to War | PBS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How would the Cuban Missile Crisis have turned out?
Three Men Go to War | PBS
If nuclear missiles fly around mankind is wiped from face of the earth.How would the Cuban Missile Crisis have turned out?
Three Men Go to War | PBS
If it had been Trump and Putin instead, I think there would have been nuclear missiles flying around, and we might not be as advanced as we currently are.
But, don't worry, you might still get a chance to see how Trump would handle a Cuban Missile Crisis situation.
But if we do, I fear for the country and the world.
If nuclear missiles fly around mankind is wiped from face of the earth.How would the Cuban Missile Crisis have turned out?
Three Men Go to War | PBS
If it had been Trump and Putin instead, I think there would have been nuclear missiles flying around, and we might not be as advanced as we currently are.
But, don't worry, you might still get a chance to see how Trump would handle a Cuban Missile Crisis situation.
But if we do, I fear for the country and the world.
Unlike Khrushchev's correct assessment of JFK as a rank amateur, Putin would have sized up Trump as someone he couldn't bluff or bully. Trump may well have removed our missiles from Turkey, but only in return for Soviet concessions in Europe. The "Cuban Missile Crisis" was a complete scam to allow JFK to claim he wasn't a dilettante, just like his concocted hero story about PT 109.
How would the Cuban Missile Crisis have turned out?
Three Men Go to War | PBS
Sometimes I read things that help me put other posts in perspective.
Unlike the weak Kennedy Trump would have taken out the threat in Cuba and kicked Castro's butt.
Kennedy's weakness was the cause of the Cold War going on for another 30 years. He essentially gave the Soviets the red light to intervene in Central America, Africa and SE Asia.
He is not going to retaliate against the US.Wonder what Putin has planned for retaliation?
He is not going to retaliate against the US.Wonder what Putin has planned for retaliation?
He is bolstering Syrian defenses.
I guess it depends on your idea of what constitutes retaliation. I think the Russians aren't interested in escalating tensions.He is not going to retaliate against the US.Wonder what Putin has planned for retaliation?
He is bolstering Syrian defenses.
You sure about no retaliation? And, as far as bolstering Syria's air defenses, you do know that he's bolstering them against the possibility of another joint strike by US/French/English forces? He's giving them a better surface to air system to shoot down any missiles that may be shot into Syria. And, because Putin is close friends with Assad, you can bet it's not to defend Syria from Russian forces.
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria as Putin blasts 'act of aggression'
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria
- Russia's ambassador to the U.S. warned there would be "consequences" for the strike on Syria, and that a "pre-designed scenario" was underway.
- In ordering strikes on Syria, President Donald Trump called out both Iran and Russia for their support of Bashar Assad's government.
I guess it depends on your idea of what constitutes retaliation. I think the Russians aren't interested in escalating tensions.He is not going to retaliate against the US.Wonder what Putin has planned for retaliation?
He is bolstering Syrian defenses.
You sure about no retaliation? And, as far as bolstering Syria's air defenses, you do know that he's bolstering them against the possibility of another joint strike by US/French/English forces? He's giving them a better surface to air system to shoot down any missiles that may be shot into Syria. And, because Putin is close friends with Assad, you can bet it's not to defend Syria from Russian forces.
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria as Putin blasts 'act of aggression'
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria
- Russia's ambassador to the U.S. warned there would be "consequences" for the strike on Syria, and that a "pre-designed scenario" was underway.
- In ordering strikes on Syria, President Donald Trump called out both Iran and Russia for their support of Bashar Assad's government.
I thought it was clear who Syria needs to defend itself from. Clearly the US is the aggressor.
Depends on the circumstances I would think. If he has to defend Russians I think he would.I guess it depends on your idea of what constitutes retaliation. I think the Russians aren't interested in escalating tensions.He is not going to retaliate against the US.Wonder what Putin has planned for retaliation?
He is bolstering Syrian defenses.
You sure about no retaliation? And, as far as bolstering Syria's air defenses, you do know that he's bolstering them against the possibility of another joint strike by US/French/English forces? He's giving them a better surface to air system to shoot down any missiles that may be shot into Syria. And, because Putin is close friends with Assad, you can bet it's not to defend Syria from Russian forces.
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria as Putin blasts 'act of aggression'
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria
- Russia's ambassador to the U.S. warned there would be "consequences" for the strike on Syria, and that a "pre-designed scenario" was underway.
- In ordering strikes on Syria, President Donald Trump called out both Iran and Russia for their support of Bashar Assad's government.
I thought it was clear who Syria needs to defend itself from. Clearly the US is the aggressor.
If Trump lobs any more missiles into Syria, I'll bet you dollars to stale donuts that Putin is gonna do something militarily to the US.
Depends on the circumstances I would think. If he has to defend Russians I think he would.I guess it depends on your idea of what constitutes retaliation. I think the Russians aren't interested in escalating tensions.He is not going to retaliate against the US.Wonder what Putin has planned for retaliation?
He is bolstering Syrian defenses.
You sure about no retaliation? And, as far as bolstering Syria's air defenses, you do know that he's bolstering them against the possibility of another joint strike by US/French/English forces? He's giving them a better surface to air system to shoot down any missiles that may be shot into Syria. And, because Putin is close friends with Assad, you can bet it's not to defend Syria from Russian forces.
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria as Putin blasts 'act of aggression'
Russia warns of 'consequences' for US-led strike on Syria
- Russia's ambassador to the U.S. warned there would be "consequences" for the strike on Syria, and that a "pre-designed scenario" was underway.
- In ordering strikes on Syria, President Donald Trump called out both Iran and Russia for their support of Bashar Assad's government.
I thought it was clear who Syria needs to defend itself from. Clearly the US is the aggressor.
If Trump lobs any more missiles into Syria, I'll bet you dollars to stale donuts that Putin is gonna do something militarily to the US.
If he has to defend Assad the chances go up.
If another pr stunt like the last effort, probably not.