If CNN Was A Supervillain It Would Be Called 'The RETRACTOR' ... Bwuhahaha

[easyt65]

Bwuhahahahaha.........

At CNN, Retracted Story Leaves an 'Elite' Reporting Team Bruised
- At CNN, Retracted Story Leaves an Elite Reporting Team Bruised

 

[Toro]

You rubes are easily distracted!

lol

 

[easyt65]

Did someone call for 'FAKE NEWS'?!

Never Fear, the 'Retractor' is here!



[URL='https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fi.cdn.cnn.com%2Fcnn%2F.e%2Fimg%2F3.0%2Fglobal%2Fmisc%2Fcnn-logo.png&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F2016%2F09%2F28%2Fus%2Fpepe-the-frog-hate-symbol-trnd%2Findex.html&docid=u7ujjixIwc30sM&tbnid=PdfaeBK2f1qLQM%3A&vet=10ahUKEwit9s2Cq5HWAhUq34MKHQxMAGsQMwhyKEMwQw..i&w=400&h=400&bih=772&biw=1122&q=CNN%20Icon%20meme&ved=0ahUKEwit9s2Cq5HWAhUq34MKHQxMAGsQMwhyKEMwQw&iact=mrc&uact=8']

[/URL]

 

[kiwiman127]

Bwuhahahahaha.........

At CNN, Retracted Story Leaves an 'Elite' Reporting Team Bruised
- At CNN, Retracted Story Leaves an Elite Reporting Team Bruised

And then there is this, from way back in 2012!
Yes Roger, Fox News Has Retracted False Stories

FOX's file: | PunditFact

Fox News retracts Seth Rich conspiracy story

I could go on and on.
But do I think Fox News is "fake news"? No.
Like many MSM media sources, Fox News has bias leanings. Which is unlike the real "fake news" purveyors.
Are intellectually capable of understanding the differences?

 

[Syriusly]

Bwuhahahahaha.........

At CNN, Retracted Story Leaves an 'Elite' Reporting Team Bruised
- At CNN, Retracted Story Leaves an Elite Reporting Team Bruised

Imagine if we had a President who could admit it when he published a false story.

Instead of just continuing to lie about it.

 

[basquebromance]

want to destroy CNN forever? stop watching it! cut the cord, dummy!

 

[arjt27]

Of course it is never a good thing to retract any words you have said NO MATTER who you are ( especially rich news organizations) but this type of thing happens with most every news network that ever existed. i.e The New York Times or Fox News. I tend to rather think that the "issue" is how these miscues (probably intentional miscues) are handled.

Shrink your URLs and get paid!
Shrink your URLs and get paid!
Shrink your URLs and get paid!
Retraction Watch - Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process at Retraction Watch

And these links do contain ads if you couldn't tell, but it does link you to real sources! (plus I plan on monthly donations to help along with many others to keep this wonderful forum up.)

 

[arjt27]

I do get some news from Fox and CNN, but I sometimes take this news with a grain of salt.