IC Whistleblower report concerns Trump and a foreign leader

"Let's release the transcript". Sorry, Trump gets to decide that. So wish all you want, because unless he pulls an Obama and says something on an open mic, you don't get to hear the president's conversations with foreign leaders.

Trump has NO legal basis to have ANYTHING to do with a whistle blower complaint that is about HIM

A President's private conversation with a foreign leader is not readily divulged, unless you're Obama and you have it on an open mic. And yes, sometimes executive privilege really does mean all you get to do is complain about stuff you don't get to see or hear.
 
WE GOT HIM NOW... PFFT... LMFAO!!!


Exactly omg too funny! :laugh:

Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said Friday in a Fox op-ed that the Deep State whistleblower who penned a complaint against Trump may not be a whistleblower at all — it appears he is an American spy in our Intel Agency spying on President Trump.

Gregg Jarrett: It Appears the 'Whistleblower' is Just an American Spy in Our Intel Agency Spying on President Trump
Hahaha...you goobers will believe ANYTHING
 
What concerns me is it was sufficient for the IG to take it very seriously. That is not a partisan position.
 
Yea I know...it's not Russia Today so you don't believe it
 
Not only is the call and the coercion an issue...but the flouting of the law in covering it up as well
 
Last edited:
Apparently, Trump, in a phone call, made a promise to a foreign leader that prompted an intelligence agency employee to file a formal complaint. The Intelligence Community Inspector General deemed the report "credible and urgent". Naturally, the Trump stooge "acting director" (Trump has him on a leash, of course) is refusing to comply with the law and provide the report to Congress. He says it isn't urgent. Unfortunately for him, the law says it's not his call.

Under threat of subpoena, he (Joseph Maguire) will testify next Thursday in an open session of Congress and also behind closed doors with the Intelligence Committee.

They will, of course, ask him if Trump or Barr are directing him to violate the law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html?outputType=amp

Trump's communications with a foreign leader has sparked a whistleblower complaint - CNNPolithtmla


I'm confident Maguire was required to take an oath of office.
If he didn't take an oath of office, then he should not be DNI.
If Maguire did take an oath of office, then we will eventually be able to determine if his oath of office was to The US Constitution, or if his oath is to Trump. :9:
 
Not only is the call and the coercion an issue...but the flouting of the law in covering it up as well
Sounds like another Trump Tower meeting with the Russian lawyer, all over again. Wash, rinse, repeat.
 
Apparently, Trump, in a phone call, made a promise to a foreign leader that prompted an intelligence agency employee to file a formal complaint. The Intelligence Community Inspector General deemed the report "credible and urgent". Naturally, the Trump stooge "acting director" (Trump has him on a leash, of course) is refusing to comply with the law and provide the report to Congress. He says it isn't urgent. Unfortunately for him, the law says it's not his call.

Under threat of subpoena, he (Joseph Maguire) will testify next Thursday in an open session of Congress and also behind closed doors with the Intelligence Committee.

They will, of course, ask him if Trump or Barr are directing him to violate the law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html?outputType=amp

Trump's communications with a foreign leader has sparked a whistleblower complaint - CNNPolithtmla


I'm confident Maguire was required to take an oath of office.
If he didn't take an oath of office, then he should not be DNI.
If Maguire did take an oath of office, then we will eventually be able to determine if his oath of office was to The US Constitution, or if his oath is to Trump. :9:
Well,he gets called to the carpet on Thursday. That used to mean something.
 
Here's the fake news headline of the day.
CNN reporter fact-checks conspiracy theory involving Biden and Ukraine


Since when has CNN been interested in facts?

Since when has Trump been interested in facts?

The fact that Trump does not care about reality does not change the simple fact that CNN does not care either. No one trusts the media anymore with damn good reason.

Distrust of the media is no excuse for ignorance . Information is out there when you read between the lies on both sides.
 
Here's the fake news headline of the day.
CNN reporter fact-checks conspiracy theory involving Biden and Ukraine


Since when has CNN been interested in facts?

Since when has Trump been interested in facts?

The fact that Trump does not care about reality does not change the simple fact that CNN does not care either. No one trusts the media anymore with damn good reason.

Distrust of the media is no excuse for ignorance . Information is out there when you read between the lies on both sides.

did you have a point?
 
Here's the fake news headline of the day.
CNN reporter fact-checks conspiracy theory involving Biden and Ukraine



Why was Trump withholding aid from Ukraine, and why did he subsequently release it?

Could it be because he, too is in the middle of a life-or-death plethora of hatred between the nations of Russia and the Ukraine, where 95% of the farmers were murdered to death in WWII because Stalin didn't like being criticized by the presses there and decided to wipe out the Ukranian people like Hitler decided with his pal from Jerusalem, to wipe out the Jews in Europe?

The Ukrainians are like Presbyterians. They are the dissenters of world stupidity. That often puts them on the fence, so that they take flak from both sides. Amen.
 
Apparently, Trump, in a phone call, made a promise to a foreign leader that prompted an intelligence agency employee to file a formal complaint. The Intelligence Community Inspector General deemed the report "credible and urgent". Naturally, the Trump stooge "acting director" (Trump has him on a leash, of course) is refusing to comply with the law and provide the report to Congress. He says it isn't urgent. Unfortunately for him, the law says it's not his call.

Under threat of subpoena, he (Joseph Maguire) will testify next Thursday in an open session of Congress and also behind closed doors with the Intelligence Committee.

They will, of course, ask him if Trump or Barr are directing him to violate the law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html?outputType=amp

Trump's communications with a foreign leader has sparked a whistleblower complaint - CNNPolithtmla
Lemme see, if I got this right here: this just has to be simpler than "in an open session of Congress and also behind closed doors."

Is that leftist, lockstep Demmie Press-speak or what? :lmao:

And it also gives the Demmies a license to leak whatever they want to leak that makes the President look bad and themselves look like heroes, until all the sordid facts also leak out that shows they were unfair, of course. :rolleyes:
 
Apparently, Trump, in a phone call, made a promise to a foreign leader that prompted an intelligence agency employee to file a formal complaint. The Intelligence Community Inspector General deemed the report "credible and urgent". Naturally, the Trump stooge "acting director" (Trump has him on a leash, of course) is refusing to comply with the law and provide the report to Congress. He says it isn't urgent. Unfortunately for him, the law says it's not his call.

Under threat of subpoena, he (Joseph Maguire) will testify next Thursday in an open session of Congress and also behind closed doors with the Intelligence Committee.

They will, of course, ask him if Trump or Barr are directing him to violate the law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...9-bfb1-849887369476_story.html?outputType=amp

Trump's communications with a foreign leader has sparked a whistleblower complaint - CNNPolithtmla
Lemme see, if I got this right here: this just has to be simpler than "in an open session of Congress and also behind closed doors."

Is that leftist, lockstep Demmie Press-speak or what? :lmao:

And it also gives the Demmies a license to leak whatever they want to leak that makes the President look bad and themselves look like heroes, until all the sordid facts also leak out that shows they were unfair, of course. :rolleyes:
No idea what you are babbling about.
 

Forum List

Back
Top