Discussion in 'Congress' started by Cuyo, Jul 21, 2010.
i guess we'll see wont we
Toomey is Santorum Lite, a Club for Growth long time culture warrior trying to run as a fiscal conservative and hoping nobody notices his inner Pat Robertson until its too late. Not my cup of tea, no pun intended.
Sestak is a hack of the opposite persuasion, although the one thing he has going for him as far as I'm concerned is his willingness to buck the party establishment to take on Darlin Arlen in the primaries. We'll see how far that takes him once his toes and the Party line make nice again.
I'm not a fan of either one, honestly. I like independent thinkers, neither of these people are in the same zip code as an independent thought.
But violence? Cuyo, my friend, lighten up already. Or go vicarious and buy a dartboard at least.
What makes him sleazy? Could be information I want for the upcoming election. I think we can all agree that Sestak's hands are clean in the job offer incident, right? If that's what you're referencing...
And seriously guys, I'm not punching anyone in the face. I was being tongue in cheek, I thought that was kinda obvious.
The Club for Growthers are fascists. Close enough.
Haha....the little puke can't even obey the law.....
Did Joe Sestak/Bill Clinton Conversation Break the Law? - Crossroads - CBS News
he makes Clinton look honest and we damn sure KNOW thats bullshit.
In the days before indoor plumbing, chamber pots came decorated with politicians faces. One could get a great deal of relief that way.
You are such a hack... You know nothing of either man, but Sestak "makes sense for PA"...
I've seen Sestak speak several times. I don't know much about the pasty face R. Why do Rs get so damn old so fast?
You clearly don't know what fascist means. That word gets thrown around as much as racist and Socialist and none of you really understand what you're saying.
You don't think Sestak is Independent? He seems like Scott Brown and I'm kind of liking him for being that way.
Separate names with a comma.