I noticed Reps had a lot of bills on cutting the debt, figures they would

[Penelope]

come out with that after the rich got a giant tax cut and the Dems took maj of the House. They want to cut social programs. The national debt is not like household debt, one you have to pay off, or file bankruptcy, ask Trump about that, the other you just print more money and raise interest rates or taxes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, in general it is probably a better idea to rely on taxation rather than borrowing to fund government programs (especially permanent ones). Most government debt ends up owned by the wealthy, and so a huge outstanding debt can end up being a sort of subsidy of the rich. Similarly, the current debt explosion is objectionable insofar as it represents a giant transfer of income to the top 1 percent. But that is a tactical issue, and one that could be corrected through progressive taxation.

At bottom, the American national debt is no big deal, and insofar as it can be a problem, it has nothing to do with how mainstream budget reporting presents the issue.

Silly propaganda (like the national debt clock) deserves nothing but a snicker.

America is borrowing like crazy. Don't worry.

7 reasons we don't need to pay off the national debt

 

[jillian]

come out with that after the rich got a giant tax cut and the Dems took maj of the House. They want to cut social programs. The national debt is not like household debt, one you have to pay off, or file bankruptcy, ask Trump about that, the other you just print more money and raise interest rates or taxes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, in general it is probably a better idea to rely on taxation rather than borrowing to fund government programs (especially permanent ones). Most government debt ends up owned by the wealthy, and so a huge outstanding debt can end up being a sort of subsidy of the rich. Similarly, the current debt explosion is objectionable insofar as it represents a giant transfer of income to the top 1 percent. But that is a tactical issue, and one that could be corrected through progressive taxation.

At bottom, the American national debt is no big deal, and insofar as it can be a problem, it has nothing to do with how mainstream budget reporting presents the issue.

Silly propaganda (like the national debt clock) deserves nothing but a snicker.

America is borrowing like crazy. Don't worry.

7 reasons we don't need to pay off the national debt

You are aware that dems didn’t control the House, the Senate Or the Executive branch when that happened, right dear?

 

[gipper]

I have told you two ladies repeatedly, there is little difference between the two crime families. At least as it applies to big issues. They are one an the same particularly on war, debt, expanding government, limiting liberty, etc.

Now I know Silly Jilly is a rabid D who is stuck in the shit hole of partisanship. Penny maybe not so much.

 

[Penelope]

come out with that after the rich got a giant tax cut and the Dems took maj of the House. They want to cut social programs. The national debt is not like household debt, one you have to pay off, or file bankruptcy, ask Trump about that, the other you just print more money and raise interest rates or taxes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, in general it is probably a better idea to rely on taxation rather than borrowing to fund government programs (especially permanent ones). Most government debt ends up owned by the wealthy, and so a huge outstanding debt can end up being a sort of subsidy of the rich. Similarly, the current debt explosion is objectionable insofar as it represents a giant transfer of income to the top 1 percent. But that is a tactical issue, and one that could be corrected through progressive taxation.

At bottom, the American national debt is no big deal, and insofar as it can be a problem, it has nothing to do with how mainstream budget reporting presents the issue.

Silly propaganda (like the national debt clock) deserves nothing but a snicker.

America is borrowing like crazy. Don't worry.

7 reasons we don't need to pay off the national debt

You are aware that dems didn’t control the House, the Senate Or the Executive branch when that happened, right dear?

We do control the House of Representatives. We have the Maj. since 2019. We need not worry about the debt of the nation, or the national debt. So whatever the GOP has up its sleeves for cutting social programs we do not need to.
How The National Debt Actually Works

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

come out with that after the rich got a giant tax cut and the Dems took maj of the House. They want to cut social programs. The national debt is not like household debt, one you have to pay off, or file bankruptcy, ask Trump about that, the other you just print more money and raise interest rates or taxes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, in general it is probably a better idea to rely on taxation rather than borrowing to fund government programs (especially permanent ones). Most government debt ends up owned by the wealthy, and so a huge outstanding debt can end up being a sort of subsidy of the rich. Similarly, the current debt explosion is objectionable insofar as it represents a giant transfer of income to the top 1 percent. But that is a tactical issue, and one that could be corrected through progressive taxation.

At bottom, the American national debt is no big deal, and insofar as it can be a problem, it has nothing to do with how mainstream budget reporting presents the issue.

Silly propaganda (like the national debt clock) deserves nothing but a snicker.

America is borrowing like crazy. Don't worry.

7 reasons we don't need to pay off the national debt

If you cut off the War on Poverty and stop paying 1 trillion dollars to people who sit on their liberal lazy ass all day, and bitch and moan how fucked their liberal lives are, soon those liberals will either work, thus cutting down the debt also, or be shot for trying to rob others, thus lowering their CO2 footprint, helping save the planet. Win win either way..

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

come out with that after the rich got a giant tax cut and the Dems took maj of the House. They want to cut social programs. The national debt is not like household debt, one you have to pay off, or file bankruptcy, ask Trump about that, the other you just print more money and raise interest rates or taxes.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, in general it is probably a better idea to rely on taxation rather than borrowing to fund government programs (especially permanent ones). Most government debt ends up owned by the wealthy, and so a huge outstanding debt can end up being a sort of subsidy of the rich. Similarly, the current debt explosion is objectionable insofar as it represents a giant transfer of income to the top 1 percent. But that is a tactical issue, and one that could be corrected through progressive taxation.

At bottom, the American national debt is no big deal, and insofar as it can be a problem, it has nothing to do with how mainstream budget reporting presents the issue.

Silly propaganda (like the national debt clock) deserves nothing but a snicker.

America is borrowing like crazy. Don't worry.

7 reasons we don't need to pay off the national debt

You are aware that dems didn’t control the House, the Senate Or the Executive branch when that happened, right dear?

We do control the House of Representatives. We have the Maj. since 2019. We need not worry about the debt of the nation, or the national debt. So whatever the GOP has up its sleeves for cutting social programs we do not need to.
How The National Debt Actually Works

So when Republicans have the house, debt bad, when Dimwitocraps are in , debt good..Got it....