I Just Wonder

go ahead because it's for damn sure you don't have the brain power to answer the questions. I suppose you do remember how the black people cheered the acquittal of OJ SIMPSON when he got away with murdering two white people? I bet you cheered right along with them

Kind of like cheering the acquittal of Zimmerman isnt it?

do you have a link to that? and I'm talking nationwide. just like the aftermath of the OJ trial. I'll wait patiently

Link to what exactly? The cheering of Zimmermans acquittal?

Watch FoxNews this morning
 
I'm going to create a national outrage about your dumb threads.

go ahead because it's for damn sure you don't have the brain power to answer the questions. I suppose you do remember how the black people cheered the acquittal of OJ SIMPSON when he got away with murdering two white people? I bet you cheered right along with them

Every once in a while you're just allowed to kill somebody I guess. What a wacky world

Based on what we are seeing in the whacky world of Chicago, a black person is clearly allowed, permitted yeah, even encouraged to kill another black person. Age doesn't matter.

A black person killing a white person is totally cool, because whites held blacks in slavery until about 160 years ago. And then, about 600,000 of those despicable white ass crackers died in a civil war to liberate slaves who were too stupid to invade Europe and America to get their own white slaves. And then those intelligent freed black slaves refused to go back to Africa, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT an entire country known as LIBERIA (which means FREEDOM) was created for them. They all preferred the country that held then slaves to go back to where they would have found life far worse, as it has been proven and demonstrated thru the decades.

Looks like the worms like Sharpton and Jackson and Farrakhan and Joy Reed still prefer a cracker white President, even one like George Walker Bush to heads of state like Idi Amin, Kenyatta, Taylor and Emperor Bokassa.

It is time to shut up the forever malcontents like these phony pretenders of the cloth.
 
This is why Republicans are alienating voters/losing elections. Keep up the good work WillowTree. :clap2: :)eusa_shhh: bet she thinks the War of Southern Rebellion aint over yet as well)
 
If, every time a white person dies at the hands of a black person, should we create a "national outrage"? about it?

Isn't that what you already do? ie. N. Simpson-O.J. ?
Why don't we start with the baby who was killed in it's stroller, or the man in cobb country who was attacked by a mob of blacks, beaten and thrown into traffic? Let's get Eric Holder to get involved and treat that as a hate crime.

Have after it Willow, the right is experts at targeting minoritys, so raise hell with your right looneytune leaders!! Or maybe they only care when a diplomat gets taken out by a brownie.
 
According to the FBI the black killing of whites and whites killing of blacks statistics:

in 2010
447 white people killed by blacks.
218 black people killed by whites.

2,777 white people killed whites.
2,459 black people killed blacks.

So there were nearly two times as many white people murdered by BLACKS as blacks murdered by whites.

FBI ? Expanded Homicide Data Table 6

Whatever you say, doesn't matter. Whatever the FACTS are doesn't matter.

Liberal minds (pardon the expression, it may not apply) are like concrete, all mixed up and permanently set, not to be confused by facts.

Over 160 years ago some white folks held some black folks as slaves. That justifies giving jobs and free sustenance to blacks, known as Affirmative Action. Never mind the FACT that I never held any black person as slave. Since I am an immigrant, neither have any of my ancestors. But I happen to be white and for creeps like Sharpton, that alone is a crime.
 
WillowTree drops by to do one of her trademark, drive by, race-baiting, threads. :clap2: Quelle surprise! :doubt: Republican much? :eusa_eh: :rofl:

And you stop by to post in a thread just to tell us you're not interested in the thread.

Remember Tawana Brawley? Remember Rodney King? Remember the Liberty City riots?

There's something wrong with people who can be driven by the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM to go out and burn, rape and murder in the name of righteousness.

Martin Luther King (a lifelong Republican) would be ashamed

Martin Luther King was a Republican

Martin Luther King Jr wasn't.

Martin Luther King Jr was a lifelong Republican.

You can choose to believe your idiotic propaganda or you can believe the truth.

In that era, over 90% of Blacks were Republicans.

Especially in the South.

It was Republicans that went into the South to help Black people build Churches, Homes and communities after the War.

It was Republicans who founded the NAACP. It was Republicans who founded the NRA for THE SOLE PURPOSE of arming Blacks and trying to prevent dimocrap scum from lynching them at every opportunity.

The 1924 dimocrap National Convention was called the "Klan Bake". dimocraps formed the KKK specifically as the terrorist arm of the dimocrap party in the South.

You won't believe any of this because.... Well, because you're stupid.

Republicans have NEVER favored one race over another. Never.

dimocrap scum ALWAYS have.

In 1964, when after the deal with MLK was made and LBJ said, "We'll have them N-words voting dimocrap for 200 years!" things started to change. When hundreds of thousands of Black people were uprooted from the Rural homes and sent to live in the filth and crime of Inner Cities where dimocrap scum could exercise total control over them....

dimocaps started to favor Blacks over Whites.

Republicans don't do that. We don't favor one race over another. Never have. Never will.

dimocrap scum interpret this, they interpret the fact that we refuse to favor Blacks as racist.

It is not. We simply refuse to discriminate. That's what dimpcrap scum do. Not us.
 
A New York Times analysis of homicides and census data in Chicago compared areas near murders to those that were not. Residents living near homicides in the last 12 years were much more likely to be black, earn less money and lack a college degree.


Near
homicides

Not near
homicides



Population
1.3 mil. 1.4 mil.

Income
$38,318 $61,175

No high school
27% 15%

High school
28% 20%

Bachelor’s +
19% 43%

Pct. white
24% 61%

Pct. black
55% 14%


Pct. Asian
3% 8%

Under age 18
28% 20%



Austin More than 450 homicides have happened in this neighborhood in Chicago’s West Side, one of the city’s deadliest places.


Lincoln Park A predominantly white neighborhood on Chicago’s North Side had about 10 percent the murder rate of neighborhoods to the west.


Grand Crossing A shooting broke out during the funeral for a victim of another shooting in December. Chicago’s South Side, in neighborhoods like Englewood, Auburn and Woodlawn, has some of the city’s highest concentrations of murders.


Hyde ParkLess than one homicide per year happened in this affluent neighborhood, which is also home to the University of Chicago.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/01/02/us/chicago-killings.html?_r=0


It must be da white mans fault!!
 
I am grateful that justice prevailed in spite of a continued attempt by the race dogs , and media to shift the burded on the defense. It was a simple case: TM jumped, and assaulted GZ continually until he had to defend himself.
It is disgusting that this case was brought for the soul impetus of RACE.
 
And you stop by to post in a thread just to tell us you're not interested in the thread.

Remember Tawana Brawley? Remember Rodney King? Remember the Liberty City riots?

There's something wrong with people who can be driven by the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM to go out and burn, rape and murder in the name of righteousness.

Martin Luther King (a lifelong Republican) would be ashamed

Martin Luther King was a Republican

Martin Luther King Jr wasn't.

Martin Luther King Jr was a lifelong Republican.

You can choose to believe your idiotic propaganda or you can believe the truth.

In that era, over 90% of Blacks were Republicans.

Especially in the South.

It was Republicans that went into the South to help Black people build Churches, Homes and communities after the War.

It was Republicans who founded the NAACP. It was Republicans who founded the NRA for THE SOLE PURPOSE of arming Blacks and trying to prevent dimocrap scum from lynching them at every opportunity.

The 1924 dimocrap National Convention was called the "Klan Bake". dimocraps formed the KKK specifically as the terrorist arm of the dimocrap party in the South.

You won't believe any of this because.... Well, because you're stupid.

Republicans have NEVER favored one race over another. Never.

dimocrap scum ALWAYS have.

In 1964, when after the deal with MLK was made and LBJ said, "We'll have them N-words voting dimocrap for 200 years!" things started to change. When hundreds of thousands of Black people were uprooted from the Rural homes and sent to live in the filth and crime of Inner Cities where dimocrap scum could exercise total control over them....

dimocaps started to favor Blacks over Whites.

Republicans don't do that. We don't favor one race over another. Never have. Never will.

dimocrap scum interpret this, they interpret the fact that we refuse to favor Blacks as racist.

It is not. We simply refuse to discriminate. That's what dimpcrap scum do. Not us.

Martin Luther King Jr was a LIBERAL.
 
Martin Luther King was a Republican

Martin Luther King Jr wasn't.

Martin Luther King Jr was a lifelong Republican.

You can choose to believe your idiotic propaganda or you can believe the truth.

In that era, over 90% of Blacks were Republicans.

Especially in the South.

It was Republicans that went into the South to help Black people build Churches, Homes and communities after the War.

It was Republicans who founded the NAACP. It was Republicans who founded the NRA for THE SOLE PURPOSE of arming Blacks and trying to prevent dimocrap scum from lynching them at every opportunity.

The 1924 dimocrap National Convention was called the "Klan Bake". dimocraps formed the KKK specifically as the terrorist arm of the dimocrap party in the South.

You won't believe any of this because.... Well, because you're stupid.

Republicans have NEVER favored one race over another. Never.

dimocrap scum ALWAYS have.

In 1964, when after the deal with MLK was made and LBJ said, "We'll have them N-words voting dimocrap for 200 years!" things started to change. When hundreds of thousands of Black people were uprooted from the Rural homes and sent to live in the filth and crime of Inner Cities where dimocrap scum could exercise total control over them....

dimocaps started to favor Blacks over Whites.

Republicans don't do that. We don't favor one race over another. Never have. Never will.

dimocrap scum interpret this, they interpret the fact that we refuse to favor Blacks as racist.

It is not. We simply refuse to discriminate. That's what dimpcrap scum do. Not us.

Martin Luther King Jr was a LIBERAL.

But he wasn't a radical.

I am a liberal, but I am not a radical.

Most dimocraps just don't gt that.

There is a difference.

In fact, if you knew anything about history, you'd know that Republicans INVENTED liberalism and progressivism. Just a fact.

dimocraps aren't liberals, they're radicals.

Which is why I call them dimocraps.

If you're a liberal, a true liberal? the dimocrap party left you at the dance decades ago.
 
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/oracetab.htm

Homicide Offending Rates per 100,000 Population by Race
White Black Other
1976 4.9 46.6 4.6
1977 5.1 44.4 4.8
1978 5.3 44.6 3.7
1979 5.8 47.7 5.0
1980 6.4 51.5 6.9
1981 6.0 45.9 6.3
1982 5.6 41.2 6.4
1983 5.3 36.3 6.2
1984 5.3 33.1 5.3
1985 5.1 34.0 5.8
1986 5.3 37.9 6.0
1987 5.2 36.6 5.0
1988 4.9 41.2 4.5
1989 5.1 42.0 4.7
1990 5.6 46.6 4.2
1991 5.6 51.4 5.4
1992 5.2 47.0 5.7
1993 5.2 49.2 5.6
1994 5.1 45.4 5.1
1995 4.9 39.3 5.4
1996 4.5 35.9 4.8

No way??? You mean black offenders murdering people is more than 10 - 25 times MORE likely?? BUT BUT the media and race whores say differently? Where are all of the RACE PIMPS highlighting those cases?? RACISTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
 
Last edited:
Martin Luther King was a Republican

Martin Luther King Jr wasn't.

Martin Luther King Jr was a lifelong Republican.

You can choose to believe your idiotic propaganda or you can believe the truth.

In that era, over 90% of Blacks were Republicans.

Especially in the South.

It was Republicans that went into the South to help Black people build Churches, Homes and communities after the War.

It was Republicans who founded the NAACP. It was Republicans who founded the NRA for THE SOLE PURPOSE of arming Blacks and trying to prevent dimocrap scum from lynching them at every opportunity.

The 1924 dimocrap National Convention was called the "Klan Bake". dimocraps formed the KKK specifically as the terrorist arm of the dimocrap party in the South.

You won't believe any of this because.... Well, because you're stupid.

Republicans have NEVER favored one race over another. Never.

dimocrap scum ALWAYS have.

In 1964, when after the deal with MLK was made and LBJ said, "We'll have them N-words voting dimocrap for 200 years!" things started to change. When hundreds of thousands of Black people were uprooted from the Rural homes and sent to live in the filth and crime of Inner Cities where dimocrap scum could exercise total control over them....

dimocaps started to favor Blacks over Whites.

Republicans don't do that. We don't favor one race over another. Never have. Never will.

dimocrap scum interpret this, they interpret the fact that we refuse to favor Blacks as racist.

It is not. We simply refuse to discriminate. That's what dimpcrap scum do. Not us.

Martin Luther King Jr was a LIBERAL.

Anybody who believed that a person should be judged by the content of his character, rather than the color of his skin, can NOT and could NOT have ever been, by definition, a Democrat or a liberal.

I say that, based on the opinions I see by liberals on this forum and the way the main stream media portrays the world.
 
If, every time a white person dies at the hands of a black person, should we create a "national outrage"? about it?

Why don't we start with the baby who was killed in it's stroller, or the man in cobb country who was attacked by a mob of blacks, beaten and thrown into traffic? Let's get Eric Holder to get involved and treat that as a hate crime.

????
A "national outrage" is usually created by a saturation of media coverage. If that is what you desire you should be on the phone to your local newspapers and stations to get the process started.
 

Forum List

Back
Top