I don't give two shits about Hillary breaking some glass ceiling. I simply couldn't care less.

[Dot Com]

when Citizens United is in place and she's sucking Goldman's cawk for contributions? Ummm..... no.

Congratulations…you’re exercising your right to be a perfect dumbass.

So you have no retort? Figures.

The only reason she is where she is because of who she knows, NOT because of her abilities. You must be proud

hiLIARy Clinton "release the Goldman speech transcripts" countdown clock

I doubt she knew the hundreds of thousands who voted for her twice as Senator from NY. I doubt she knew every Senator who voted for her very well. But, hell, its your fantasy.

I don’t pay a lot of attention to who posts what. I’m not sure who you supported so I looked back recently. You seem to have been a Bernie backer. But as a Senator, you say, he accomplished nothing by being elected…. So I don’t follow whatever logic you’re using.

No matter. HRC will win without your support. Get used to it.

I do have to say, when she was a senator from New York, even my Dad--who was a staunch Republican--told me to shut up when I started dissing her. He approved of her, said she was doing a good job for them. I guess you had to know my Dad to appreciate what that means.

My uncle in NY was an organizer for Obama and he told me never to vote for that lying bitch.

true

she's a pro war (pro defense contractor), pro- Wall St puppet

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

 

[Dot Com]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

Of course you don't think it's a big deal. You're a self-centered white male.

White males have completely dominated the Presidency and party nominations for over two centuries. If you aren't a white male, you tend to notice shit like that, and you tend to feel there is a serious need to change it.

That's why when Trump pines for the good old days, he is (knowingly or unknowingly) pining for the days when women and darkies knew their place and when homos stayed in the closet.

It's a big deal when a centuries old blockade is broken. A YUUUGE deal.

hiLIARy is as crooked (bought-and-paid-for) as any male out there g5000

 

[Lakhota]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

Of course you don't think it's a big deal. You're a self-centered white male.

White males have completely dominated the Presidency and party nominations for over two centuries. If you aren't a white male, you tend to notice shit like that, and you tend to feel there is a serious need to change it.

That's why when Trump pines for the good old days, he is (knowingly or unknowingly) pining for the days when women and darkies knew their place and when homos stayed in the closet.

It's a big deal when a centuries old blockade is broken. A YUUUGE deal.

hiLIARy is as crooked (bought-and-paid-for) as any male out there g5000

You Bernie zombies are hilarious!

 

[Syriusly]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

And no one but you made that claim in this thread. Troll fail

 

[Syriusly]

Oh man…you are too much.

HRC has the best resume of anyone to seek the job of POTUS since Bush 41.

Candy , ask yourself this.


If the candidate were named Henry Clinton with the same EXACT resume and were running against a female Democrat in the primary who had MUCH less experience would you still be claiming that Henry had the best resume?

The rest of us know the answer , I'm just curious as to whether you can answer honestly.

Clearly the rest of you are dishonest idiots.

I vote for a candidate based upon many factors- relevant experience is one- in general my criteria for President is

1. Presidential experience
2. Governor experience
3. Vice President experience
4. Cabinet level experience- especially Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense
   
5. Senator experience
6. Legislative experience either in Congress or State legislation.
   
7. All other executive experience
8. All other relevant experience.

But there is also message- what is the message the candidate making? What is the temperment of the candidate? And I compare all of those.

Would I choose a woman candidate who had less experience than "Henry Clinton"- such as Carly Fiorina? Absolutely not.

 

[Syriusly]

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

And no one but you made that claim in this thread. Troll fail

It is fun to watch you backpedal.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

And no one but you made that claim in this thread. Troll fail

It is fun to watch you backpedal.

It's annoying watching you make shit up to argue against it.

I'm done with your stupidity....bye

 

[martybegan]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

The novelty of him being the first Black Presidential Candidate certainly helped improve voter turnout for him, both with blacks, and with other races. That can't be denied.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

No one claimed he won b/c he's black you idiot.

You know, I read the posts on this board, Full of dishonesty, full of semi literacy, just out and out stupidity. It really is no wonder that of 360M in this country Hillary and Donald are our two Presidential candidates. We have dishonest morons voting, it should surprise no one that we end up with dishonest morons as our choices to hold elected office.

 

[Meathead]

If Hillary does to relations between the sexes what Obama did to race relations, we may as well have a civil war and get it over with.

 

[Dreadnaught1968]

Oh man…you are too much.

HRC has the best resume of anyone to seek the job of POTUS since Bush 41.

list her NOTABLE accomplishments. I'll wait (Holding titles is not an accomplishment candyEstablishmentdrone)

8 years as FLOTUS

That's like saying your spouse is an engineer, therefore you are qualified to be an engineer.

2 Time Senator from NY

In a state where Dead Person (D) would win.

4 Years as SoS

I guess ducking sniper fire would be a qualification... or maybe not...

Grammy Winner

Now THERE'S a qualification. Win a Grammy, you can run for President!

Consistently voted the most/one of the most admired persons in the US/World

A lot of people like watching American Idol, too. Does that make it the best thing on TV?

I'll take a current or former Governor of a state over a Secretary of State any day of the week.

 

[Dot Com]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

Of course you don't think it's a big deal. You're a self-centered white male.

White males have completely dominated the Presidency and party nominations for over two centuries. If you aren't a white male, you tend to notice shit like that, and you tend to feel there is a serious need to change it.

That's why when Trump pines for the good old days, he is (knowingly or unknowingly) pining for the days when women and darkies knew their place and when homos stayed in the closet.

It's a big deal when a centuries old blockade is broken. A YUUUGE deal.

hiLIARy is as crooked (bought-and-paid-for) as any male out there g5000

You Bernie zombies are hilarious!

said the crony Dem Establishment drone

 

[Dot Com]

Oh man…you are too much.

HRC has the best resume of anyone to seek the job of POTUS since Bush 41.

list her NOTABLE accomplishments. I'll wait (Holding titles is not an accomplishment candyEstablishmentdrone)

8 years as FLOTUS

That's like saying your spouse is an engineer, therefore you are qualified to be an engineer.

2 Time Senator from NY

In a state where Dead Person (D) would win.

4 Years as SoS

I guess ducking sniper fire would be a qualification... or maybe not...

Grammy Winner

Now THERE'S a qualification. Win a Grammy, you can run for President!

Consistently voted the most/one of the most admired persons in the US/World

A lot of people like watching American Idol, too. Does that make it the best thing on TV?

I'll take a current or former Governor of a state over a Secretary of State any day of the week.

thats candycorn's crony Dem pretzel logic for you

 

[Lakhota]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

Of course you don't think it's a big deal. You're a self-centered white male.

White males have completely dominated the Presidency and party nominations for over two centuries. If you aren't a white male, you tend to notice shit like that, and you tend to feel there is a serious need to change it.

That's why when Trump pines for the good old days, he is (knowingly or unknowingly) pining for the days when women and darkies knew their place and when homos stayed in the closet.

It's a big deal when a centuries old blockade is broken. A YUUUGE deal.

hiLIARy is as crooked (bought-and-paid-for) as any male out there g5000

You Bernie zombies are hilarious!

said the crony Dem Establishment drone

America isn't ready for a radical senile socialist who can't get his utopia passed through Congress. Hillary can get good stuff done. Go Hillary!

 

[Dot Com]

Male/female is just not an important metric to me. You're either capable to do a job or you're not. But based on democratic shallowness I expect their next "new" presidential candidate in the next cycle to be a Latino. They've determined that the office they are running for is not a serious job so searching for a candidate based first on color & sex is completely appropriate to them.

Of course you don't think it's a big deal. You're a self-centered white male.

White males have completely dominated the Presidency and party nominations for over two centuries. If you aren't a white male, you tend to notice shit like that, and you tend to feel there is a serious need to change it.

That's why when Trump pines for the good old days, he is (knowingly or unknowingly) pining for the days when women and darkies knew their place and when homos stayed in the closet.

It's a big deal when a centuries old blockade is broken. A YUUUGE deal.

hiLIARy is as crooked (bought-and-paid-for) as any male out there g5000

You Bernie zombies are hilarious!

said the crony Dem Establishment drone

America isn't ready for a radical senile socialist who can't get his utopia passed through Congress. Hillary can get good stuff done. Go Hillary!

but its ready for a confirmed liar who has next to no accomplishments aside from getting paid by Goldman for cheerleader speeches?

 

[OldLady]

What a whine fest.

As the father of a daughter, I quite understand why many women are glad to see this day. That you think that this is THE ONLY reason why Hillary Clinton was nominated just shows how shallow your evaluation is.

That you say I said, that is the only reason she won, just shows how shallow your trolling skills are.

That you are trying to backpedal from your own OP shows your typical lack of integrity.

You: Like many voted for Obama for only this reason many will vote for Hillary for "her" reason.

Are you really trying to deny that many people voted for Obama simply b/c he's black?

Jesus Christ, that's like some dumb shit trying to deny that many people voted AGAINST Obama simply b/c he's black.

Both are ridiculous claims.

No- what is ridiculous are the claims by the far right that President Obama only won because he was black, and that the only reason why people voted for him was because he was black- and the OP offers a similar opinion about Hillary Clinton.

Yes- people get excited whenever someone is the first of any group to attain some office. That doesn't mean that is the only reason anyone votes for anyone.

No one claimed he won b/c he's black you idiot.

You know, I read the posts on this board, Full of dishonesty, full of semi literacy, just out and out stupidity. It really is no wonder that of 360M in this country Hillary and Donald are our two Presidential candidates. We have dishonest morons voting, it should surprise no one that we end up with dishonest morons as our choices to hold elected office.

A difference of opinion does not equal dishonesty. Just sayin'.

 

[Dot Com]

I don't care what sex that Sell-Out/Liar is. I don't want her in the WH

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Oh man…you are too much.

HRC has the best resume of anyone to seek the job of POTUS since Bush 41.

Now that's funny because she has done nothing and has numerous scandals under her belt.