I don't care what anyone thinks, I never tire hearing of U.S successes in WWII, from Trump or anyone

[anotherlife]

Not really, productivity is way up, but wages are not.
So your argument doesn't hold much.

I've seen Millennials, and Generation Z work hard, they just don't want to for such meager wages.

We're on a brink of collapse.
Mostly because

A.) We are super divided, and getting violent about it, a Civil War is real close.
Things like Illegals & Abortion will play a big role... Yes Trump's mouth, and lack of leadership are making matters worse.

With a USA, Civil War China & Russia win.

B.) Even if we don't go to Civil War.
Which I see as highly unlikely at this rate.

Eventually we will become a culturally replaced Latino country, and we have failed our objective as a nation.
Because Mexicans tend to resent us, not embrace us.

So, absolutely we're f*cked.

Wages are indeed going up. For the first time in decades. Productivity is up thanks to automation. There are far fewer people working in the major car makers plants because robots are taking over. Progressives do indeed try and divide the country but that's because they are stalinist by nature, so yes, we are indeed headed for a civil war, the question is how, and where does it start.

The ending is the important part. if enough progressives are left afterwards then we are indeed screwed. On the other hand, if enough Constitutionalists are left, then the country will be fine.

Of course there's great reason to divide people up & be concerned with growing Balkanization.

A.) Balkanization has caused chaos, division and conflict.
B.) Balkanization will eventually eradicate a culture.
C.) There's no proof of racial equality.
D.) There's a ton of evidences for racial inequality.

As for Constitutionalists, or following the Founding Fathers?

The ones who only let 6% of the population to vote,
or ONLY White property land owner males to vote?
Who
had the Naturalization Act of 1790 which only wanted to have freed Whites of good character to become US citizens?
Who
thought Blacks, and Native Americans couldn't be citizens, or were either non-Human, or sub-Human?
or
That it was okay to enslave Blacks, because they were lesser?

Of course, we don't follow this.

We also don't follow the Founding Fathers when it comes to War.
The Founding Fathers were Isolationists.

Jefferson was initially against a standing army, although had later gone to war with the Barbary Pirates.

Still, the Founding Fathers were for War by Congress, this doesn't happen like it's supposed to, over, and over again the USA keeps bombing countries, or invading, or using proxies, without Congress approval.

Then there's Taxation with Representation.
With the Republicans thinking the many countries, especially the Zion needs a ton of aid.
That's not Taxation with Representation.

So, how & who are these Constitutionalists?

Why did they feel the need to divide people up?

Constitutionalists DON'T divide people up. That is the purview of progressives. Divide and conquer. The Constitution was written in such a manner that the government was supposed to remain weak. As technology has changed there have been modifications to the COTUS to allow us to continue as a nation, but the past 150 years has been an attack, by the wealthy elite, upon the very fabric of the COTUS. So long as that document remains, the elite can't do what they want.

The Founding Fathers certainly divided people up.

A good deal of the modern Constitutionalists are also dividing people up.

Now-a-days I mostly just divide on Globalist vs anti-Globalist.

If you're with the Globalists you're my enemy....

This is no longer race or religion issues.

It's good vs evil.
Sense vs the senseless.
Greed & power vs the meek & giving.

The COTUS is anti globalist if you would ever bother to read it.

That one before Truman, who called Stain uncleJo was a globalist socialist president of the USA and he divided Europe like a pig.

 

[anotherlife]

But how far can America run with the solution, that it put the lesser evil of that time above the greater evil of that time, promoting the lesser evil to be the mightiest of all evils in history and future?

The Nazi's had to go.........Russia helped in that situation.........Wasn't that we really liked the Russians..........We didn't...........but with the entire world at War you must make choices......to Victory.........and playing this oh Russia game.......is like shooting yourself in the foot.

Why did the Nazis have to go? Were they not a democratically elected government just like yours?

No, they weren't. If you actually had read a book you would know that.

Actually Sobiesky explained why a few posts above.

No, he didn't.

Yes he did.

 

[anotherlife]

This is exactly the devil's trick. Now that both sides have moved the moral compass, civilization is dead no matter which one of them loses.

Untrue. If the Nazi's had been allowed to conquer the Soviet Union, then civilization would have died. As it is, one half of the world has been allowed to carry on, while the progressive side was denied civilization. Now, the two sides are coming to a head again, and we will see if civilization survives it again.

The other way around. Civilization died in Versailles 1920 and in Paris 1947.

Wrong, but you seem to be wrong a lot.

No, not wrong, but correct.

Then tell us what aspect of those agreements ended civilization.

Every aspects of all those agreements ended civilization, for example the Bible writes that you are a thief if you move a border stone. All borders of Europe were redrawn. It has replaced European civilization with simple lowly thieves.

It is one thing, when some marauding army takes away your land to rob you and kill you. But when this is formulated in a legal contract like an agreement, then it is another. Once the signature of the losing party is on that piece of paper, it is it's very legalistic nature that ends civilization.

 

[anotherlife]

If you are a teacher, then you already know, that nobody invited the Americans into ww1. Your corrupt globalist punkly dishonest government went against the will of your indigenous population and loaded your passenger ship Lousithania with heavy weapons to make it a target and an excuse. So your American pride helped no one.

Zimmerman Note and Balfour Declaration..................pffft...........you are an amateur antagonist..............America Hater that you are.

The isolationist movement of the USA to keep it out of both world wars was what was in America's interest. This was opposite to the interest of the American government. This too is the reason why they named it in such a deceptive way "isolationist".

 

[anotherlife]

VERY interesting diagrams! Thank you. They actually prove my point. This thread is about the value of US drafted manpower. Russia assembled the nasty gang. Much bigger than the US. So the US punks smashed up the German lunchbox by simply aligning with the goons of the Russian godfather. Hardly an achievement. At least not in the positive sense.

"US punks"

Remember this, my fellow Americans, the next time foreigners want to use us as so-called "allies" and as their back up military. Remember this. Never again with these losers and punks. Never, ever, ever again.

What makes you think that I would be a foreigner?

Lots of tells. Lots

I think you are pulling my leg. (How do you like my English? I've just found this new phrase and I love it!)

If you are a teacher, then you already know, that nobody invited the Americans into ww1. Your corrupt globalist punkly dishonest government went against the will of your indigenous population and loaded your passenger ship Lousithania with heavy weapons to make it a target and an excuse. So your American pride helped no one.

And for ww2, that was a re run of the same thing. You again prevented the countries of the Holly Alliance from erasing those western costal state formations, calling themselves France and UK that have so deeply engraved themselves into hatred against God, that they redrew even the map.

The American actions in ww1-2 are responsible for the damnation of the entire European continent, which continues and worsens to this day.

"YOUR corrupt globalist punky dishonest government".....blah blah blah....I can smell an anti-American foreigner from 2 miles away, dork. And you stink.

And you are a liberal propaganda shill. That's worse.

 

[SweetSue92]

Untrue. If the Nazi's had been allowed to conquer the Soviet Union, then civilization would have died. As it is, one half of the world has been allowed to carry on, while the progressive side was denied civilization. Now, the two sides are coming to a head again, and we will see if civilization survives it again.

The other way around. Civilization died in Versailles 1920 and in Paris 1947.

Wrong, but you seem to be wrong a lot.

No, not wrong, but correct.

Then tell us what aspect of those agreements ended civilization.

Every aspects of all those agreements ended civilization, for example the Bible writes that you are a thief if you move a border stone. All borders of Europe were redrawn. It has replaced European civilization with simple lowly thieves.

It is one thing, when some marauding army takes away your land to rob you and kill you. But when this is formulated in a legal contract like an agreement, then it is another. Once the signature of the losing party is on that piece of paper, it is it's very legalistic nature that ends civilization.

Where you from, chump?

I'm guessing Germany

 

[anotherlife]

The other way around. Civilization died in Versailles 1920 and in Paris 1947.

Wrong, but you seem to be wrong a lot.

No, not wrong, but correct.

Then tell us what aspect of those agreements ended civilization.

Every aspects of all those agreements ended civilization, for example the Bible writes that you are a thief if you move a border stone. All borders of Europe were redrawn. It has replaced European civilization with simple lowly thieves.

It is one thing, when some marauding army takes away your land to rob you and kill you. But when this is formulated in a legal contract like an agreement, then it is another. Once the signature of the losing party is on that piece of paper, it is it's very legalistic nature that ends civilization.

Where you from, chump?

I'm guessing Germany

It is interesting that people become what you call them. Can I call you a few things too?

 

[SweetSue92]

Wrong, but you seem to be wrong a lot.

No, not wrong, but correct.

Then tell us what aspect of those agreements ended civilization.

Every aspects of all those agreements ended civilization, for example the Bible writes that you are a thief if you move a border stone. All borders of Europe were redrawn. It has replaced European civilization with simple lowly thieves.

It is one thing, when some marauding army takes away your land to rob you and kill you. But when this is formulated in a legal contract like an agreement, then it is another. Once the signature of the losing party is on that piece of paper, it is it's very legalistic nature that ends civilization.

Where you from, chump?

I'm guessing Germany

It is interesting that people become what you call them. Can I call you a few things too?

You already know I'm American. You tried to bug out like you were American too..."Maths" sure. You're probably European, maybe Aussie or NZ, and FOR SURE anti-American, the rest doesn't really matter to me. Anti-Americans like you decided for me many many years ago that:

1. You are no allies of ours and

2. We should never ever again give one dime or drop of blood for any cause of yours

Now you see the rest of the US is just catching up. You think Trump is some strange aberration? No honey. Trump is, God willing, your new normal. Most of us are anti-Europe anymore and don't care if the entire Middle East, Russia or whatever takes over. It's a big shrug from us.

Bye now

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Not really, productivity is way up, but wages are not.
So your argument doesn't hold much.

I've seen Millennials, and Generation Z work hard, they just don't want to for such meager wages.

We're on a brink of collapse.
Mostly because

A.) We are super divided, and getting violent about it, a Civil War is real close.
Things like Illegals & Abortion will play a big role... Yes Trump's mouth, and lack of leadership are making matters worse.

With a USA, Civil War China & Russia win.

B.) Even if we don't go to Civil War.
Which I see as highly unlikely at this rate.

Eventually we will become a culturally replaced Latino country, and we have failed our objective as a nation.
Because Mexicans tend to resent us, not embrace us.

So, absolutely we're f*cked.

Wages are indeed going up. For the first time in decades. Productivity is up thanks to automation. There are far fewer people working in the major car makers plants because robots are taking over. Progressives do indeed try and divide the country but that's because they are stalinist by nature, so yes, we are indeed headed for a civil war, the question is how, and where does it start.

The ending is the important part. if enough progressives are left afterwards then we are indeed screwed. On the other hand, if enough Constitutionalists are left, then the country will be fine.

Of course there's great reason to divide people up & be concerned with growing Balkanization.

A.) Balkanization has caused chaos, division and conflict.
B.) Balkanization will eventually eradicate a culture.
C.) There's no proof of racial equality.
D.) There's a ton of evidences for racial inequality.

As for Constitutionalists, or following the Founding Fathers?

The ones who only let 6% of the population to vote,
or ONLY White property land owner males to vote?
Who
had the Naturalization Act of 1790 which only wanted to have freed Whites of good character to become US citizens?
Who
thought Blacks, and Native Americans couldn't be citizens, or were either non-Human, or sub-Human?
or
That it was okay to enslave Blacks, because they were lesser?

Of course, we don't follow this.

We also don't follow the Founding Fathers when it comes to War.
The Founding Fathers were Isolationists.

Jefferson was initially against a standing army, although had later gone to war with the Barbary Pirates.

Still, the Founding Fathers were for War by Congress, this doesn't happen like it's supposed to, over, and over again the USA keeps bombing countries, or invading, or using proxies, without Congress approval.

Then there's Taxation with Representation.
With the Republicans thinking the many countries, especially the Zion needs a ton of aid.
That's not Taxation with Representation.

So, how & who are these Constitutionalists?

Why did they feel the need to divide people up?

Constitutionalists DON'T divide people up. That is the purview of progressives. Divide and conquer. The Constitution was written in such a manner that the government was supposed to remain weak. As technology has changed there have been modifications to the COTUS to allow us to continue as a nation, but the past 150 years has been an attack, by the wealthy elite, upon the very fabric of the COTUS. So long as that document remains, the elite can't do what they want.

The Founding Fathers certainly divided people up.

A good deal of the modern Constitutionalists are also dividing people up.

Now-a-days I mostly just divide on Globalist vs anti-Globalist.

If you're with the Globalists you're my enemy....

This is no longer race or religion issues.

It's good vs evil.
Sense vs the senseless.
Greed & power vs the meek & giving.

The COTUS is anti globalist if you would ever bother to read it.

The 2nd amendment or right to bear arms was a great idea against Globalists.

The 14th Amendment is how they've ruined America with Balkanization through.birth right.

The 1st Amendment is good & bad.

Because freedom of press is ruining America because of the Kosher Globalists run the media.

Freedom of religion validates the Synagogue of Satan.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

No, not wrong, but correct.

Then tell us what aspect of those agreements ended civilization.

Every aspects of all those agreements ended civilization, for example the Bible writes that you are a thief if you move a border stone. All borders of Europe were redrawn. It has replaced European civilization with simple lowly thieves.

It is one thing, when some marauding army takes away your land to rob you and kill you. But when this is formulated in a legal contract like an agreement, then it is another. Once the signature of the losing party is on that piece of paper, it is it's very legalistic nature that ends civilization.

Where you from, chump?

I'm guessing Germany

It is interesting that people become what you call them. Can I call you a few things too?

You already know I'm American. You tried to bug out like you were American too..."Maths" sure. You're probably European, maybe Aussie or NZ, and FOR SURE anti-American, the rest doesn't really matter to me. Anti-Americans like you decided for me many many years ago that:

1. You are no allies of ours and

2. We should never ever again give one dime or drop of blood for any cause of yours

Now you see the rest of the US is just catching up. You think Trump is some strange aberration? No honey. Trump is, God willing, your new normal. Most of us are anti-Europe anymore and don't care if the entire Middle East, Russia or whatever takes over. It's a big shrug from us.

Bye now

1.) I'm going to have to prop him & his Hungarians up beyond you & your Kosher Nationalism.

2.) Hungarians are Polish allies & great moral & logical people.

USA not so much sadly anymore...Now the USA are the Kosher Globalists.

3.) USA should survive...but not as it is.
What it is is disgusting.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Wages are indeed going up. For the first time in decades. Productivity is up thanks to automation. There are far fewer people working in the major car makers plants because robots are taking over. Progressives do indeed try and divide the country but that's because they are stalinist by nature, so yes, we are indeed headed for a civil war, the question is how, and where does it start.

The ending is the important part. if enough progressives are left afterwards then we are indeed screwed. On the other hand, if enough Constitutionalists are left, then the country will be fine.

Of course there's great reason to divide people up & be concerned with growing Balkanization.

A.) Balkanization has caused chaos, division and conflict.
B.) Balkanization will eventually eradicate a culture.
C.) There's no proof of racial equality.
D.) There's a ton of evidences for racial inequality.

As for Constitutionalists, or following the Founding Fathers?

The ones who only let 6% of the population to vote,
or ONLY White property land owner males to vote?
Who
had the Naturalization Act of 1790 which only wanted to have freed Whites of good character to become US citizens?
Who
thought Blacks, and Native Americans couldn't be citizens, or were either non-Human, or sub-Human?
or
That it was okay to enslave Blacks, because they were lesser?

Of course, we don't follow this.

We also don't follow the Founding Fathers when it comes to War.
The Founding Fathers were Isolationists.

Jefferson was initially against a standing army, although had later gone to war with the Barbary Pirates.

Still, the Founding Fathers were for War by Congress, this doesn't happen like it's supposed to, over, and over again the USA keeps bombing countries, or invading, or using proxies, without Congress approval.

Then there's Taxation with Representation.
With the Republicans thinking the many countries, especially the Zion needs a ton of aid.
That's not Taxation with Representation.

So, how & who are these Constitutionalists?

Why did they feel the need to divide people up?

Constitutionalists DON'T divide people up. That is the purview of progressives. Divide and conquer. The Constitution was written in such a manner that the government was supposed to remain weak. As technology has changed there have been modifications to the COTUS to allow us to continue as a nation, but the past 150 years has been an attack, by the wealthy elite, upon the very fabric of the COTUS. So long as that document remains, the elite can't do what they want.

The Founding Fathers certainly divided people up.

A good deal of the modern Constitutionalists are also dividing people up.

Now-a-days I mostly just divide on Globalist vs anti-Globalist.

If you're with the Globalists you're my enemy....

This is no longer race or religion issues.

It's good vs evil.
Sense vs the senseless.
Greed & power vs the meek & giving.

The COTUS is anti globalist if you would ever bother to read it.

That one before Truman, who called Stain uncleJo was a globalist socialist president of the USA and he divided Europe like a pig.

2 things.

1.) USA did help collapse Soviets starting with Carter-Brzezinski.

2.) Soviets seem to have been more Nationalist & Conservative in the end rather than the Capitalist free World.

In the 1960s in the USA Kosher Globalist media pushed civil rights & tolerance of everybody except dumb Polaks.

In 1960s Poland Soviets barred Kosher people from holding positions in Poland in the Political Crisis of 1968.
Most Koshers left Poland as a result.

So...Im not so sure Capitalism is better.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

If you are a teacher, then you already know, that nobody invited the Americans into ww1. Your corrupt globalist punkly dishonest government went against the will of your indigenous population and loaded your passenger ship Lousithania with heavy weapons to make it a target and an excuse. So your American pride helped no one.

Zimmerman Note and Balfour Declaration..................pffft...........you are an amateur antagonist..............America Hater that you are.

I'm going to say that Germany in WW1 was more Globalist than the USA.
But, that Germany in WW2 was more anti-Globalist than the USA.

Germany in WW1 was very Globalist.
Yes,
the Zimmerman Telegram of trying to get Mexico to attack the USA is one such example.
Another,
Is that Germany in WW1 in 1917 sent the train of Bolsheviks to Russia, the so called Gelphand plan by the Kosher Commie Izrael Gelphand.
Yes
They got Ottoman Turk Islamists to even help them in WW1.
Yes
Kosher people loved Germany in WW1.... Yes even after WW1, most of Poznan's Koshers for example fought with Germany against Poland, just after WW1, in the Greater Poland Uprising against German control over Polish majority Poznan.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Russia was a necessary evil at the time. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Until the other enemy is dead.

Russia bleed German ground forces and took massive deaths doing so..........Had they not been doing that how would have Normandy worked out when the first day we only put 150k on the beach..........Battles between Germany and Russia had millions in it..........And it was necessary to get rid of Hitler.

How?
Basically Americans & Brits were too cowardly to do most of the fighting, so they had Soviet Russia do their dirty work.

Besides, the Soviets killed on a scale close to that of Hitler, not once, but twice, once under Lenin just before & after 1920, and then again under Stalin in the late 1920's, 1930's & early 1940's.

They the Globalists in the far-West didn't care much about that.

aka they used the Russians as cannon fodder............and understood that Stalin and lenin were mass murders themselves..................

Art of War............let the enemy do the dying................Russia was only a ally of necessity at the time and nothing more..........aka.........the enemy of mine enemy is my friend.

The first A-Bomb was tested right before the Potsdam Conference which finalized the Soviet take over of countries like Poland, Hungary, East Germany & Czechoslovakia.

The USA could've threatened Soviets with the A-Bomb.

Instead Kosher Rosenbergs fought to give Soviets Nukes of their own.

...Churchill was outraged on our policy to allow the Russians to take more territory..........because he knew the score.......and why they went to War to begin with. But such is history;.

Really?
Because I've read Churchill called Poles as Callous Lunatics for not wanting to give up their pre-WW2 borders for the Stalinist Soviets,
and
that Churchill allowed Soviets to march in the victory parade following WW2, but not Polish people living in Britain.

 

[anotherlife]

Of course there's great reason to divide people up & be concerned with growing Balkanization.

A.) Balkanization has caused chaos, division and conflict.
B.) Balkanization will eventually eradicate a culture.
C.) There's no proof of racial equality.
D.) There's a ton of evidences for racial inequality.

As for Constitutionalists, or following the Founding Fathers?

The ones who only let 6% of the population to vote,
or ONLY White property land owner males to vote?
Who
had the Naturalization Act of 1790 which only wanted to have freed Whites of good character to become US citizens?
Who
thought Blacks, and Native Americans couldn't be citizens, or were either non-Human, or sub-Human?
or
That it was okay to enslave Blacks, because they were lesser?

Of course, we don't follow this.

We also don't follow the Founding Fathers when it comes to War.
The Founding Fathers were Isolationists.

Jefferson was initially against a standing army, although had later gone to war with the Barbary Pirates.

Still, the Founding Fathers were for War by Congress, this doesn't happen like it's supposed to, over, and over again the USA keeps bombing countries, or invading, or using proxies, without Congress approval.

Then there's Taxation with Representation.
With the Republicans thinking the many countries, especially the Zion needs a ton of aid.
That's not Taxation with Representation.

So, how & who are these Constitutionalists?

Why did they feel the need to divide people up?

Constitutionalists DON'T divide people up. That is the purview of progressives. Divide and conquer. The Constitution was written in such a manner that the government was supposed to remain weak. As technology has changed there have been modifications to the COTUS to allow us to continue as a nation, but the past 150 years has been an attack, by the wealthy elite, upon the very fabric of the COTUS. So long as that document remains, the elite can't do what they want.

The Founding Fathers certainly divided people up.

A good deal of the modern Constitutionalists are also dividing people up.

Now-a-days I mostly just divide on Globalist vs anti-Globalist.

If you're with the Globalists you're my enemy....

This is no longer race or religion issues.

It's good vs evil.
Sense vs the senseless.
Greed & power vs the meek & giving.

The COTUS is anti globalist if you would ever bother to read it.

That one before Truman, who called Stain uncleJo was a globalist socialist president of the USA and he divided Europe like a pig.

2 things.

1.) USA did help collapse Soviets starting with Carter-Brzezinski.

2.) Soviets seem to have been more Nationalist & Conservative in the end rather than the Capitalist free World.

In the 1960s in the USA Kosher Globalist media pushed civil rights & tolerance of everybody except dumb Polaks.

In 1960s Poland Soviets barred Kosher people from holding positions in Poland in the Political Crisis of 1968.
Most Koshers left Poland as a result.

So...Im not so sure Capitalism is better.

I begin to think that the real answer to the problem is probably within the Polish Church. They call it national, but I think it is much more than that, they I think have the saving power for Poland, and with that the country borders don't even matter. The globalists have realized that ultra nationalism is something that they can use to get more control. Yes, the soviets used this heavily.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

VERY interesting diagrams! Thank you. They actually prove my point. This thread is about the value of US drafted manpower. Russia assembled the nasty gang. Much bigger than the US. So the US punks smashed up the German lunchbox by simply aligning with the goons of the Russian godfather. Hardly an achievement. At least not in the positive sense.

"US punks"

Remember this, my fellow Americans, the next time foreigners want to use us as so-called "allies" and as their back up military. Remember this. Never again with these losers and punks. Never, ever, ever again.

What makes you think that I would be a foreigner?

Lots of tells. Lots

I think you are pulling my leg. (How do you like my English? I've just found this new phrase and I love it!)

If you are a teacher, then you already know, that nobody invited the Americans into ww1. Your corrupt globalist punkly dishonest government went against the will of your indigenous population and loaded your passenger ship Lousithania with heavy weapons to make it a target and an excuse. So your American pride helped no one.

And for ww2, that was a re run of the same thing. You again prevented the countries of the Holly Alliance from erasing those western costal state formations, calling themselves France and UK that have so deeply engraved themselves into hatred against God, that they redrew even the map.

The American actions in ww1-2 are responsible for the damnation of the entire European continent, which continues and worsens to this day.

A laughable assertion. Europe is responsible for everything that happened to it.

Besides the Kosher people...I.E Excluding the Kosher people.

Much of Europe's ills can be traced back to Anglo-Saxons (English & Germans)

Probably a staggering 90% of it.

Yes, even Anglo-Saxons in the USA.

The remaining 10% is mostly Russian.

To tell you the truth probably only 1% of Europe's ills comes from people who are not German, English, or Russian.

Most of that 1% is probably French with Napoleon.


Poles make up literally 0% of Europe's ills, and probably 70% of Europe's solutions.

Yes, Poles helped so much in Europe.

Battle of Vienna & Battle of Varna against Islamic Turks

Battle of Warsaw against Soviets.

Ryszard Kuklinski again against Soviets.

Brzezinski, Walesa, Pope Jan Pawel, Solidarity against Soviets.

Then there's the fact that Poland fought Mongols in Legnica.

Poles also saved Europe from Islamic Tatars, in Hodow. among other battles.

Poles saved Scottish Calvinist refugees in the Renaissance.
or
Polish count Srzelecki saved 200,000 Irish in the Potato famine.

There's a reason why I Identify as Polish first.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Constitutionalists DON'T divide people up. That is the purview of progressives. Divide and conquer. The Constitution was written in such a manner that the government was supposed to remain weak. As technology has changed there have been modifications to the COTUS to allow us to continue as a nation, but the past 150 years has been an attack, by the wealthy elite, upon the very fabric of the COTUS. So long as that document remains, the elite can't do what they want.

The Founding Fathers certainly divided people up.

A good deal of the modern Constitutionalists are also dividing people up.

Now-a-days I mostly just divide on Globalist vs anti-Globalist.

If you're with the Globalists you're my enemy....

This is no longer race or religion issues.

It's good vs evil.
Sense vs the senseless.
Greed & power vs the meek & giving.

The COTUS is anti globalist if you would ever bother to read it.

That one before Truman, who called Stain uncleJo was a globalist socialist president of the USA and he divided Europe like a pig.

2 things.

1.) USA did help collapse Soviets starting with Carter-Brzezinski.

2.) Soviets seem to have been more Nationalist & Conservative in the end rather than the Capitalist free World.

In the 1960s in the USA Kosher Globalist media pushed civil rights & tolerance of everybody except dumb Polaks.

In 1960s Poland Soviets barred Kosher people from holding positions in Poland in the Political Crisis of 1968.
Most Koshers left Poland as a result.

So...Im not so sure Capitalism is better.

I begin to think that the real answer to the problem is probably within the Polish Church. They call it national, but I think it is much more than that, they I think have the saving power for Poland, and with that the country borders don't even matter. The globalists have realized that ultra nationalism is something that they can use to get more control. Yes, the soviets used this heavily.

Yes... It's really Catholicism vs the traitors of Catholicism,
being
A.) The Kosher traitors of Christ.
&
B.) The Protestant traitors of Catholicism.

Both Koshers & Protestants tend to be the anti-Christ, and their collaborators.

Note, they both tend to be far more greedy, selfish, pro-Abortion, pro-War, pro-Globalist, pro-Gay, pro-Islamic Refugee, rather than Catholics.

The funny part is many of them think we're the anti-Christ as Catholics.

But, who follows the faith of Jesus Christ best?
Clearly Catholics.
Because Catholics are for not Capitalism greed, nor Communism Atheist power.

Catholics are balanced, and proportionate, realizing government is necessary for some things, like stopping Abortion, and stopping excessive Capitalism greed.
or Gay Marriage
but, also too much Government is too much Power, especially when the Kosher Globalist & Atheist Globalists are using Communism to destroy.

They, the Protestants tend to be clueless, I'm convinced they're Satanic too.
Supporting in Europe Euthanasia, and Abortion to such heavy degrees, along with Gay marriages.

In America, the Protestants so greedy, war mongering, and violent.

Also they the Protestants tend to be very, very pro-Kosher.

Kosher people aren't the center of Christ, as many think, more like they are the Synagogue of Satan anti-Christ.
Every move the Kosher people make is against Christ.
They are the main anti-Christs, Protestants just happen to be their collaborators.

 

[westwall]

"US punks"

Remember this, my fellow Americans, the next time foreigners want to use us as so-called "allies" and as their back up military. Remember this. Never again with these losers and punks. Never, ever, ever again.

What makes you think that I would be a foreigner?

Lots of tells. Lots

I think you are pulling my leg. (How do you like my English? I've just found this new phrase and I love it!)

If you are a teacher, then you already know, that nobody invited the Americans into ww1. Your corrupt globalist punkly dishonest government went against the will of your indigenous population and loaded your passenger ship Lousithania with heavy weapons to make it a target and an excuse. So your American pride helped no one.

And for ww2, that was a re run of the same thing. You again prevented the countries of the Holly Alliance from erasing those western costal state formations, calling themselves France and UK that have so deeply engraved themselves into hatred against God, that they redrew even the map.

The American actions in ww1-2 are responsible for the damnation of the entire European continent, which continues and worsens to this day.

A laughable assertion. Europe is responsible for everything that happened to it.

Besides the Kosher people...I.E Excluding the Kosher people.

Much of Europe's ills can be traced back to Anglo-Saxons (English & Germans)

Probably a staggering 90% of it.

Yes, even Anglo-Saxons in the USA.

The remaining 10% is mostly Russian.

To tell you the truth probably only 1% of Europe's ills comes from people who are not German, English, or Russian.

Most of that 1% is probably French with Napoleon.


Poles make up literally 0% of Europe's ills, and probably 70% of Europe's solutions.

Yes, Poles helped so much in Europe.

Battle of Vienna & Battle of Varna against Islamic Turks

Battle of Warsaw against Soviets.

Ryszard Kuklinski again against Soviets.

Brzezinski, Walesa, Pope Jan Pawel, Solidarity against Soviets.

Then there's the fact that Poland fought Mongols in Legnica.

Poles also saved Europe from Islamic Tatars, in Hodow. among other battles.

Poles saved Scottish Calvinist refugees in the Renaissance.
or
Polish count Srzelecki saved 200,000 Irish in the Potato famine.

There's a reason why I Identify as Polish first.

Yes, yes, yes, I am sure that you can blame the ills of today on the Mongol invasions, or the Huns before them. All the ancient history did was clear the playing field for what came after. What the Europeans have done to themselves over the last 150 years is ALL on their heads. Not the ancient peoples who came long before.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The greatest generation was not all that great if we consider that their leverage was their pact with the devil called Soviet Union. It is easy to smash up your neighbor's competing shop if you do it with the godfather's goons.

....WW2 was the greatest event in human history --beyond any doubt
...the enemy was Germany--not Russia
Russia put more military up against Germany than all the rest combined
learn some history before spewing dumbshit

manpower WW2:
[ hahahahaahh ]

VERY interesting diagrams! Thank you. They actually prove my point. This thread is about the value of US drafted manpower. Russia assembled the nasty gang. Much bigger than the US. So the US punks smashed up the German lunchbox by simply aligning with the goons of the Russian godfather. Hardly an achievement. At least not in the positive sense.

Sometimes it's good to simply stop typing.

Subject debate of history can have opposing views, in fact the whole human history is of interaction between opposing views.

The Winner writes the history............Oh well........Germany and Japan lost...........Their views were null and void...............Just as the Middle East views of Israel and null and void...........because they fought with Hitler.............and had no say anymore. Kapish.

Kapish????????

 

[westwall]

Wages are indeed going up. For the first time in decades. Productivity is up thanks to automation. There are far fewer people working in the major car makers plants because robots are taking over. Progressives do indeed try and divide the country but that's because they are stalinist by nature, so yes, we are indeed headed for a civil war, the question is how, and where does it start.

The ending is the important part. if enough progressives are left afterwards then we are indeed screwed. On the other hand, if enough Constitutionalists are left, then the country will be fine.

Of course there's great reason to divide people up & be concerned with growing Balkanization.

A.) Balkanization has caused chaos, division and conflict.
B.) Balkanization will eventually eradicate a culture.
C.) There's no proof of racial equality.
D.) There's a ton of evidences for racial inequality.

As for Constitutionalists, or following the Founding Fathers?

The ones who only let 6% of the population to vote,
or ONLY White property land owner males to vote?
Who
had the Naturalization Act of 1790 which only wanted to have freed Whites of good character to become US citizens?
Who
thought Blacks, and Native Americans couldn't be citizens, or were either non-Human, or sub-Human?
or
That it was okay to enslave Blacks, because they were lesser?

Of course, we don't follow this.

We also don't follow the Founding Fathers when it comes to War.
The Founding Fathers were Isolationists.

Jefferson was initially against a standing army, although had later gone to war with the Barbary Pirates.

Still, the Founding Fathers were for War by Congress, this doesn't happen like it's supposed to, over, and over again the USA keeps bombing countries, or invading, or using proxies, without Congress approval.

Then there's Taxation with Representation.
With the Republicans thinking the many countries, especially the Zion needs a ton of aid.
That's not Taxation with Representation.

So, how & who are these Constitutionalists?

Why did they feel the need to divide people up?

Constitutionalists DON'T divide people up. That is the purview of progressives. Divide and conquer. The Constitution was written in such a manner that the government was supposed to remain weak. As technology has changed there have been modifications to the COTUS to allow us to continue as a nation, but the past 150 years has been an attack, by the wealthy elite, upon the very fabric of the COTUS. So long as that document remains, the elite can't do what they want.

The Founding Fathers certainly divided people up.

A good deal of the modern Constitutionalists are also dividing people up.

Now-a-days I mostly just divide on Globalist vs anti-Globalist.

If you're with the Globalists you're my enemy....

This is no longer race or religion issues.

It's good vs evil.
Sense vs the senseless.
Greed & power vs the meek & giving.

The COTUS is anti globalist if you would ever bother to read it.

That one before Truman, who called Stain uncleJo was a globalist socialist president of the USA and he divided Europe like a pig.

indeed he was. But this country is not run by a dictator though obummer tried to send us down that road, no, we are governed by our Constitution.

 

[Old Man Grumbles]

Seems like there is a lot of "I hate America" in this thread.