I challenge PoliticalChik on any topic

[Billy000]

[MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

 

[PoliticalChic]

[MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

I wouldn't associate with you for the same reason one shouldn’t wrestle in the mud with pigs: after a while you realize they enjoy it.

 

[Spoonman]

call out thread to politicalchic

 

[PoliticalChic]

call out thread to politicalchic

"In addition to the right of assembly guaranteed by this clause, the Court has also ruled that the Amendment implicitly protects freedom of association."

Thank heaven for freedom of association!

 

[Billy000]

[MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

I wouldn't associate with you for the same reason one shouldn’t wrestle in the mud with pigs: after a while you realize they enjoy it.

Try to be witty all you want, [MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]. You're still backing out. Obviously that says a lot...

 

[PoliticalChic]

[MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

I wouldn't associate with you for the same reason one shouldn’t wrestle in the mud with pigs: after a while you realize they enjoy it.

Try to be witty all you want, [MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]. You're still backing out. Obviously that says a lot...

You are correct, Billy000IQ.....

I tremble at the thought of having to deal with you.....


Then, there's this:

Well if it isn’t fat stinking billygoat billyboy. How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap, stinking chip-oil? Come get some in the yarbles, if you have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly thou!
— Alex Delarge, A Clockwork Orange

 

[Ropey]

 

[rdean]

[MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

I wouldn't associate with you for the same reason one shouldn’t wrestle in the mud with pigs: after a while you realize they enjoy it.

I'm sorry. I thought you were a Republican. Right wingers love to wrestle in pig shit. It's not like they hide it. They make it a huge celebration.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

[MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

I wouldn't associate with you for the same reason one shouldn’t wrestle in the mud with pigs: after a while you realize they enjoy it.

I'm sorry. I thought you were a Republican. Right wingers love to wrestle in pig shit. It's not like they hide it. They make it a huge celebration.

^ Claims he was a Republican

 

[Two Thumbs]

aww, I'm kinda bummed.

PC showed mercy.

but then again, onesided beat downs arent' all the fun to watch

 

[Luissa]

If it is a copy and paste war, PC will kick your ass.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Billy000]

I wouldn't associate with you for the same reason one shouldn’t wrestle in the mud with pigs: after a while you realize they enjoy it.

Try to be witty all you want, [MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]. You're still backing out. Obviously that says a lot...

You are correct, Billy000IQ.....

I tremble at the thought of having to deal with you.....


Then, there's this:

Well if it isn’t fat stinking billygoat billyboy. How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap, stinking chip-oil? Come get some in the yarbles, if you have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly thou!
— Alex Delarge, A Clockwork Orange

Seriously how old are you?

 

[Unkotare]

Desperate failure on the part of Billy.

 

[Darkwind]

@PoliticalChic

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

Save yourself the embarrassment.

What it means to be a liberal is a wholly subjective discussion, determined by the individual. So, how is it that you intend to have objective facts on opinions that are by their very nature, partisan?

Seriously, if you want to issue a challenge, do yourself a favor and don't. You have to first be able to articulate what it is you want to debate.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Try to be witty all you want, [MENTION=12394]PoliticalChic[/MENTION]. You're still backing out. Obviously that says a lot...

You are correct, Billy000IQ.....

I tremble at the thought of having to deal with you.....


Then, there's this:

Well if it isn’t fat stinking billygoat billyboy. How art thou, thou globby bottle of cheap, stinking chip-oil? Come get some in the yarbles, if you have any yarbles, you eunuch jelly thou!
— Alex Delarge, A Clockwork Orange

Seriously how old are you?

She's about 5 years past the average age that Asian women magically jump from looking 12 to looking 65+,

which makes her about 47.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

She posts on like 5 different topics a day and yet Progs feel a need to call her out to debate

LOL priceless

 

[thanatos144]

Gee the commies seems annoyed with pc lol good girl

tapatalk post

 

[Luissa]

Gee the commies seems annoyed with pc lol good girl

tapatalk post

You don't even know what communism is. Plus I bet even PC thinks you are a moron.


Sent from my iPhone using the tears of Raider's fans.

 

[Billy000]

@PoliticalChic

If she sees this.

EDIT: scratch that. I challenge you on a debate on what it means to be a liberal. As in, the definition of the American liberal and their motivations and political goals.

You choose who begins the debate and the time frame of completion. I require non-partisan sources of information with OBJECTIVE FACTS.

Set your terms if you have any.

Save yourself the embarrassment.

What it means to be a liberal is a wholly subjective discussion, determined by the individual. So, how is it that you intend to have objective facts on opinions that are by their very nature, partisan?

Seriously, if you want to issue a challenge, do yourself a favor and don't. You have to first be able to articulate what it is you want to debate.

I will agree a small part of being liberal is subjective, but we are still talking about fundamental definitions of words here. It is largely objective. While not all people of a particular political ideology agree, there are still obvious fundamental beliefs they all adhere too. This is politics, not philosophy. You're an idiot if you think a debate can go anywhere without objectivity. Saying liberalism and socialism are one in the same is just as ridiculous as saying conservatism and liberalism are one in the same. PC has a poor understand of what liberalism actually is and I can prove it.

Okay, now move on little boy and let the grown ups talk. This Is the Bull Ring you know. I find it amazing you cons are attacking me right now. All I did was propose a debate. Why am I not surprised you are choosing to ignore the obvious lack of integrity of PC's refusal to even begin the debate?

 

[Dot Com]

looks like PC forfeited. Nice going Billy000