Esmeralda
Diamond Member
I think it is interesting that people use the excuse of 'He/she does it; therefore, so can I.' Didn’t your parents teach you better than that? It's not an excuse for anything to point at someone else doing something heinous so you can do it too, and take pride in the fact what you're doing isn't as heinous as what the other guy did.I still don't see what you find funny. I think it's a rotten and horrible thing to do and not at all funny in any way, unless you enjoy torturing your wife. Because THAT is torture. The husband is a rotten insensitive POS. You shouldn't even JOKE about such things which really do happen sometimes. It is NOT funny.
So are the endless nut shot videos you see all over America's funniest home videos, or most of the things you see on shows like "Tosh2.0."
At least no one was actually hurt where this one was concerned.
Again, I agree that it was out of line. However, it's not like she doesn't know her husband and what he does for a living here.
Hell! My own mother (who's had five children, no less) laughed when I showed her that video (though she also said that she would have been pretty damn pissed lol).
Well your mother should have you and told you that's just sick. Her duty to teach you right from wrong, and THAT is wrong to do to someone. When you mess with a woman's sense of well being regarding her children, then you have crossed a line.
I want to know exactly what part of this video you find amusing. Is it when she runs down the stairs frantically, thinking that perhaps her child is dead or mortally wounded? Maybe it's when she finds out the SOB played a joke on her? There is nothing funny about fooling a woman into thinking her child might be dead. Nothing at all. IMO, it's just sick.
Tosh? Seriously? He shows internet tards, not innocent children allegedly being injured or killed. And when has America's funny videos show effigies of children being mortally wounded or killed?
Tosh regularly shows people getting running over by cars, breaking bones, and otherwise seriously injuring themselves.
I'm sorry, but by way of comparison, a prank in which no one gets hurt, and the "victim" isn't even all that traumatized afterwards, really isn't that big a deal in my book.
Now, granted, if she'd had a full on conniption fit, it'd be a different story. The fact of the matter, however, is that she didn't.
"No harm, no foul."
It's not true what you say, 'no harm, no foul.' There is a great deal of harm to the mother in this instance. A great deal of harm. I guess you don't realize what it feels like to think, if only for a moment, that your child is either extremely injured or fatally injured. It's a horrible, horrifying moment that no one should have to live through. And don't say 'chill,' that only indicates how immature you are.