Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
RW idiots are soooooo damn boring its pathetic -
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Finish your sentence. after pathetic type..."but I still cannot win an argument/debate with them."
why do they need to be asked again?Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.McGhan already testified for 30 hours.
Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
The redactions are irrelevant. The same questions can be asked by congress as by Mueller.
Actually the Mueller Report does name several of the liars immediately after that quote, so obviously you never read the report.Note that Andy Weissman (the leftist hack shyster who actually wrote that) doesn't spell out how it "materially impaired the investigation", nor who those individuals are.From the actual Mueller report: "Third, the investigation established that several individuals affiliated with the Trump Campaign lied to the Office, and to Congress, about their interactions with Russian-affiliated individuals and related matters. Those lies materially impaired the investigation of Russian election interference."
Vagaries don't count for shit, Buckwheat.
"They" meaning Barr and Tramp, since Barr did the redacting.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.McGhan already testified for 30 hours.
Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
But they didn't BOTH agree on all the redactions, which Barr admitted to in his Senate testimony when questioned by Graham.Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.McGhan already testified for 30 hours.
Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
why do they need to be asked again?Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
The redactions are irrelevant. The same questions can be asked by congress as by Mueller.
what do you need to know that wasn't in the report mueller wrote? Are you saying he was incompetent? BTW, Congress had two other investigations that had testimony from all of these folks done while the Mueller report was ongoing. how isn't that obstruction?why do they need to be asked again?Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
The redactions are irrelevant. The same questions can be asked by congress as by Mueller.
So the public can know of course. Don't you want to know?
McGahn's redacted testimony.what do you need to know that wasn't in the report mueller wrote? Are you saying he was incompetent?why do they need to be asked again?Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
The redactions are irrelevant. The same questions can be asked by congress as by Mueller.
So the public can know of course. Don't you want to know?
well if it was redacted, that means it is classified. McGahn doesn't need to testify to congress in that capacity. The fact that Mueller didn't find anything, is all they need to know. talk to mueller.McGahn's redacted testimony.what do you need to know that wasn't in the report mueller wrote? Are you saying he was incompetent?why do they need to be asked again?Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.
The redactions are irrelevant. The same questions can be asked by congress as by Mueller.
So the public can know of course. Don't you want to know?
WTF do you think we're talking about?
Two points.Even a majority of republicans want them to testify.
A huge majority of Americans believe that the full un redacted Muller report should have been available to congress.
America just isn't on the side of the far right wing extremists and trump.
Poll finds wide support for Mueller to testify in Congress
1000 peopleTwo points.Even a majority of republicans want them to testify.
A huge majority of Americans believe that the full un redacted Muller report should have been available to congress.
America just isn't on the side of the far right wing extremists and trump.
Poll finds wide support for Mueller to testify in Congress
1. The Full unredacted report can not be released without violating the law.
2. Are you one of the morons on this site that believe polls?
Respondents?1000 peopleTwo points.Even a majority of republicans want them to testify.
A huge majority of Americans believe that the full un redacted Muller report should have been available to congress.
America just isn't on the side of the far right wing extremists and trump.
Poll finds wide support for Mueller to testify in Congress
1. The Full unredacted report can not be released without violating the law.
2. Are you one of the morons on this site that believe polls?
and why I say polls are useless and only a tool to manipulate the stupid and interfere in an election. actually, what I think would have more weight would be how many refused to take the poll ahead of reaching the 1000 number.Respondents?1000 peopleTwo points.Even a majority of republicans want them to testify.
A huge majority of Americans believe that the full un redacted Muller report should have been available to congress.
America just isn't on the side of the far right wing extremists and trump.
Poll finds wide support for Mueller to testify in Congress
1. The Full unredacted report can not be released without violating the law.
2. Are you one of the morons on this site that believe polls?
If so that means NOTHING. Different people in different areas all have different priorities and points of views. At 1000 people they have nowhere enough people to represent the country as a whole.
Stupid people put faith in polls at this point
No, it's redacted because Barr redacted it.well if it was redacted, that means it is classified. McGahn doesn't need to testify to congress in that capacity. The fact that Mueller didn't find anything, is all they need to know. talk to mueller.McGahn's redacted testimony.what do you need to know that wasn't in the report mueller wrote? Are you saying he was incompetent?why do they need to be asked again?The redactions are irrelevant. The same questions can be asked by congress as by Mueller.
So the public can know of course. Don't you want to know?
WTF do you think we're talking about?
no they can't. executive privilege, did you miss that part? got to ask mueller.No, it's redacted because Barr redacted it.well if it was redacted, that means it is classified. McGahn doesn't need to testify to congress in that capacity. The fact that Mueller didn't find anything, is all they need to know. talk to mueller.McGahn's redacted testimony.what do you need to know that wasn't in the report mueller wrote? Are you saying he was incompetent?why do they need to be asked again?
So the public can know of course. Don't you want to know?
WTF do you think we're talking about?
No doubt because his testimony supported the obstruction found by Mueller.
Fine.
Congress can simply ask him themselves.
When I get poll calls I always identify as a gay Muslim. Call is usually pretty short.and why I say polls are useless and only a tool to manipulate the stupid and interfere in an election. actually, what I think would have more weight would be how many refused to take the poll ahead of reaching the 1000 number.Respondents?1000 peopleTwo points.Even a majority of republicans want them to testify.
A huge majority of Americans believe that the full un redacted Muller report should have been available to congress.
America just isn't on the side of the far right wing extremists and trump.
Poll finds wide support for Mueller to testify in Congress
1. The Full unredacted report can not be released without violating the law.
2. Are you one of the morons on this site that believe polls?
If so that means NOTHING. Different people in different areas all have different priorities and points of views. At 1000 people they have nowhere enough people to represent the country as a whole.
Stupid people put faith in polls at this point
Which ones did they not agree on? If you don't know, you have no business drawing any conclusions.But they didn't BOTH agree on all the redactions, which Barr admitted to in his Senate testimony when questioned by Graham.Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.McGhan already testified for 30 hours.
Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
Barr himself said they didn't agree on all the redactions in his senate testimony, so you are admitting Barr lied under oath. Thank you.Which ones did they not agree on? If you don't know, you have no business drawing any conclusions.But they didn't BOTH agree on all the redactions, which Barr admitted to in his Senate testimony when questioned by Graham.Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
LOL...Which ones did they not agree on? If you don't know, you have no business drawing any conclusions.But they didn't BOTH agree on all the redactions, which Barr admitted to in his Senate testimony when questioned by Graham.Barr worked with Mueller on the redactions. If they BOTH agreed on those redactions it contains classified information. The Democrats will keep it redacted if it doesn't contain anything damaging about Trump.If it's redacted it means he didn't say what they wanted him to say.Which of course is redacted.
The public needs to hear what he has to say.
Barr redacted it so if that's the case then they dont want his testimony to get out.
The public has a right to know.
