How Whitey screwed up Africa

[Tommy Tainant]

Yeah haw...look at all the little racists coming out of the woodwork. Well, not really. We already knew you were racist scum..but at least it is out in the open..

What is racist about what I stated? What did I say that was not factual?

you could say the same about Europe, Asia, North America...lotsa slaughtering going on all over the place.
I think what Tommy was trying to say - and went way over you racists' heads were - you have no idea how it was before Europeans arrived. And instead of dividing the country along tribal lines, it was divided up mainly by the English and French and Belgians without taking those things into consideration. Almost every single conflict in African countries since independence from their colonial masters have been waged along tribal lines. Rwanda, Congo, Uganda, Kenya - any brawl has been due to those reasons.

Yeah, you could. Up until 100 years or so ago. At least for the state level crap. Now it is individual criminals who do it. In Africa though, it is still tribal. The same as it has been for 10,000 years.

In other words, my point stands.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ulster is part of the United Kingdom. Why is Europe concerned?

Oh dear.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

you could say the same about Europe, Asia, North America...lotsa slaughtering going on all over the place.
I think what Tommy was trying to say - and went way over you racists' heads were - you have no idea how it was before Europeans arrived. And instead of dividing the country along tribal lines, it was divided up mainly by the English and French and Belgians without taking those things into consideration. Almost every single conflict in African countries since independence from their colonial masters have been waged along tribal lines. Rwanda, Congo, Uganda, Kenya - any brawl has been due to those reasons.

Yeah, you could. Up until 100 years or so ago. At least for the state level crap. Now it is individual criminals who do it. In Africa though, it is still tribal. The same as it has been for 10,000 years.

In other words, my point stands.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ireland's history of violence is well known, moron. The Irish have fought themselves for well over 1000 years. The one great leader they had, Brian Boru, was only able to bring them all together for a few short years to fight the Viking invaders before they once again began butchering each other.

The sectarian violence perpetrated over the last 50 years there was committed by a small group, funded by the Soviet Union, and trained in Lybia.

In other words, moron, they were the tip of Kruschevs spear during the cold war.

The Balkans are the same, sectarian violence going back to before the Ottomans took it over. Most of it religion based. And when the civil war broke out it was a small group of fascists trying to maintain control as they watched their power crumble.

Sectarianism in Ireland was caused by the English. They imported thousands of Scottish Presbyterians into Ulster and created an artificial enclave. When the Republic won its independence this area was partitioned as a Protestant enclave that discriminated against Catholics. The troubles arose out of the civil rights movement which was a reaction to this form of Jim Crow.

And the IRA was financed from several sources including the US who were a major backer. That is what gave President Clinton the leverage to create the GFA.
None of these facts is a secret old fella.

So you see that the ongoing problems in Ireland were created by the same high handed colonialism that created the problems in Africa.

Same bonehead arrogance leading to the same fucked up results.

"Troubles" Theres a nice euphemism a traitorous leftist would use for terrorists bombing and torturing people. Ahh just a little "trouble"

View attachment 288282 View attachment 288283 View attachment 288284 View attachment 288285 View attachment 288286

Both sides accept that as the term.

Perhaps you could find a better word ?

 

[DOTR]

Yeah, you could. Up until 100 years or so ago. At least for the state level crap. Now it is individual criminals who do it. In Africa though, it is still tribal. The same as it has been for 10,000 years.

In other words, my point stands.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ireland's history of violence is well known, moron. The Irish have fought themselves for well over 1000 years. The one great leader they had, Brian Boru, was only able to bring them all together for a few short years to fight the Viking invaders before they once again began butchering each other.

The sectarian violence perpetrated over the last 50 years there was committed by a small group, funded by the Soviet Union, and trained in Lybia.

In other words, moron, they were the tip of Kruschevs spear during the cold war.

The Balkans are the same, sectarian violence going back to before the Ottomans took it over. Most of it religion based. And when the civil war broke out it was a small group of fascists trying to maintain control as they watched their power crumble.

Sectarianism in Ireland was caused by the English. They imported thousands of Scottish Presbyterians into Ulster and created an artificial enclave. When the Republic won its independence this area was partitioned as a Protestant enclave that discriminated against Catholics. The troubles arose out of the civil rights movement which was a reaction to this form of Jim Crow.

And the IRA was financed from several sources including the US who were a major backer. That is what gave President Clinton the leverage to create the GFA.
None of these facts is a secret old fella.

So you see that the ongoing problems in Ireland were created by the same high handed colonialism that created the problems in Africa.

Same bonehead arrogance leading to the same fucked up results.

"Troubles" Theres a nice euphemism a traitorous leftist would use for terrorists bombing and torturing people. Ahh just a little "trouble"

View attachment 288282 View attachment 288283 View attachment 288284 View attachment 288285 View attachment 288286

Both sides accept that as the term.

Perhaps you could find a better word ?

I used it. Terrorist.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ireland's history of violence is well known, moron. The Irish have fought themselves for well over 1000 years. The one great leader they had, Brian Boru, was only able to bring them all together for a few short years to fight the Viking invaders before they once again began butchering each other.

The sectarian violence perpetrated over the last 50 years there was committed by a small group, funded by the Soviet Union, and trained in Lybia.

In other words, moron, they were the tip of Kruschevs spear during the cold war.

The Balkans are the same, sectarian violence going back to before the Ottomans took it over. Most of it religion based. And when the civil war broke out it was a small group of fascists trying to maintain control as they watched their power crumble.

Sectarianism in Ireland was caused by the English. They imported thousands of Scottish Presbyterians into Ulster and created an artificial enclave. When the Republic won its independence this area was partitioned as a Protestant enclave that discriminated against Catholics. The troubles arose out of the civil rights movement which was a reaction to this form of Jim Crow.

And the IRA was financed from several sources including the US who were a major backer. That is what gave President Clinton the leverage to create the GFA.
None of these facts is a secret old fella.

So you see that the ongoing problems in Ireland were created by the same high handed colonialism that created the problems in Africa.

Same bonehead arrogance leading to the same fucked up results.

"Troubles" Theres a nice euphemism a traitorous leftist would use for terrorists bombing and torturing people. Ahh just a little "trouble"

View attachment 288282 View attachment 288283 View attachment 288284 View attachment 288285 View attachment 288286

Both sides accept that as the term.

Perhaps you could find a better word ?

I used it. Terrorist.

It isnt a better word. Neither side accepts that as a description of what they did. Both sides felt that they were fighting a just war. What is the profit in describing them all as terrorists ?

 

[rightwinger]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

Europe did not care
They just wanted to loot Africa of its natural resources
The tribes just got in the way. They did make good slaves though

 

[westwall]

What is racist about what I stated? What did I say that was not factual?

you could say the same about Europe, Asia, North America...lotsa slaughtering going on all over the place.
I think what Tommy was trying to say - and went way over you racists' heads were - you have no idea how it was before Europeans arrived. And instead of dividing the country along tribal lines, it was divided up mainly by the English and French and Belgians without taking those things into consideration. Almost every single conflict in African countries since independence from their colonial masters have been waged along tribal lines. Rwanda, Congo, Uganda, Kenya - any brawl has been due to those reasons.

Yeah, you could. Up until 100 years or so ago. At least for the state level crap. Now it is individual criminals who do it. In Africa though, it is still tribal. The same as it has been for 10,000 years.

In other words, my point stands.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ireland's history of violence is well known, moron. The Irish have fought themselves for well over 1000 years. The one great leader they had, Brian Boru, was only able to bring them all together for a few short years to fight the Viking invaders before they once again began butchering each other.

The sectarian violence perpetrated over the last 50 years there was committed by a small group, funded by the Soviet Union, and trained in Lybia.

In other words, moron, they were the tip of Kruschevs spear during the cold war.

The Balkans are the same, sectarian violence going back to before the Ottomans took it over. Most of it religion based. And when the civil war broke out it was a small group of fascists trying to maintain control as they watched their power crumble.

Sectarianism in Ireland was caused by the English. They imported thousands of Scottish Presbyterians into Ulster and created an artificial enclave. When the Republic won its independence this area was partitioned as a Protestant enclave that discriminated against Catholics. The troubles arose out of the civil rights movement which was a reaction to this form of Jim Crow.

And the IRA was financed from several sources including the US who were a major backer. That is what gave President Clinton the leverage to create the GFA.
None of these facts is a secret old fella.

So you see that the ongoing problems in Ireland were created by the same high handed colonialism that created the problems in Africa.

Same bonehead arrogance leading to the same fucked up results.

No it wasn't you retard. Learn some Irish history.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

you could say the same about Europe, Asia, North America...lotsa slaughtering going on all over the place.
I think what Tommy was trying to say - and went way over you racists' heads were - you have no idea how it was before Europeans arrived. And instead of dividing the country along tribal lines, it was divided up mainly by the English and French and Belgians without taking those things into consideration. Almost every single conflict in African countries since independence from their colonial masters have been waged along tribal lines. Rwanda, Congo, Uganda, Kenya - any brawl has been due to those reasons.

Yeah, you could. Up until 100 years or so ago. At least for the state level crap. Now it is individual criminals who do it. In Africa though, it is still tribal. The same as it has been for 10,000 years.

In other words, my point stands.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ireland's history of violence is well known, moron. The Irish have fought themselves for well over 1000 years. The one great leader they had, Brian Boru, was only able to bring them all together for a few short years to fight the Viking invaders before they once again began butchering each other.

The sectarian violence perpetrated over the last 50 years there was committed by a small group, funded by the Soviet Union, and trained in Lybia.

In other words, moron, they were the tip of Kruschevs spear during the cold war.

The Balkans are the same, sectarian violence going back to before the Ottomans took it over. Most of it religion based. And when the civil war broke out it was a small group of fascists trying to maintain control as they watched their power crumble.

Sectarianism in Ireland was caused by the English. They imported thousands of Scottish Presbyterians into Ulster and created an artificial enclave. When the Republic won its independence this area was partitioned as a Protestant enclave that discriminated against Catholics. The troubles arose out of the civil rights movement which was a reaction to this form of Jim Crow.

And the IRA was financed from several sources including the US who were a major backer. That is what gave President Clinton the leverage to create the GFA.
None of these facts is a secret old fella.

So you see that the ongoing problems in Ireland were created by the same high handed colonialism that created the problems in Africa.

Same bonehead arrogance leading to the same fucked up results.

No it wasn't you retard. Learn some Irish history.

Thats a well reasoned fact free post.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

Europe did not care
They just wanted to loot Africa of its natural resources
The tribes just got in the way. They did make good slaves though

Its the same mindset that saw the southern states go to war to protect slavery.

In the book I referenced in the OP there is a great story.
The Independence celebrations for Ghana saw reps from most countries show up to celebrate and the US rep was Nixon who was Vice Pres I think. He had a great time and went round the room pressing the flesh and hugging everyone.
He approached a group of people he assumed were Ghanaians and asked them how it felt to be free.

One of them responded " I dont know, Im from Alabama". It was 1957.

 

[bodecea]

you could say the same about Europe, Asia, North America...lotsa slaughtering going on all over the place.
I think what Tommy was trying to say - and went way over you racists' heads were - you have no idea how it was before Europeans arrived. And instead of dividing the country along tribal lines, it was divided up mainly by the English and French and Belgians without taking those things into consideration. Almost every single conflict in African countries since independence from their colonial masters have been waged along tribal lines. Rwanda, Congo, Uganda, Kenya - any brawl has been due to those reasons.

Yeah, you could. Up until 100 years or so ago. At least for the state level crap. Now it is individual criminals who do it. In Africa though, it is still tribal. The same as it has been for 10,000 years.

In other words, my point stands.

Your ignorance knows no bounds. This very minute the Ulster issue is the big political issue in Europe. Artificial borders leading to ethnic and religious tensions. How is this different to what happened in Rwanda ? We could spin back a decade and discuss Yugoslavia as well.
Of course these are white countries so they dont count on your racist scale.

Ireland's history of violence is well known, moron. The Irish have fought themselves for well over 1000 years. The one great leader they had, Brian Boru, was only able to bring them all together for a few short years to fight the Viking invaders before they once again began butchering each other.

The sectarian violence perpetrated over the last 50 years there was committed by a small group, funded by the Soviet Union, and trained in Lybia.

In other words, moron, they were the tip of Kruschevs spear during the cold war.

The Balkans are the same, sectarian violence going back to before the Ottomans took it over. Most of it religion based. And when the civil war broke out it was a small group of fascists trying to maintain control as they watched their power crumble.

Sectarianism in Ireland was caused by the English. They imported thousands of Scottish Presbyterians into Ulster and created an artificial enclave. When the Republic won its independence this area was partitioned as a Protestant enclave that discriminated against Catholics. The troubles arose out of the civil rights movement which was a reaction to this form of Jim Crow.

And the IRA was financed from several sources including the US who were a major backer. That is what gave President Clinton the leverage to create the GFA.
None of these facts is a secret old fella.

So you see that the ongoing problems in Ireland were created by the same high handed colonialism that created the problems in Africa.

Same bonehead arrogance leading to the same fucked up results.

No it wasn't you retard. Learn some Irish history.

Name calling.

 

[Dr Grump]

No it wasn't you retard. Learn some Irish history.

Er, yes it was. The troubles in Ireland were definitely started when the British rocked along. That's not to say the Irish didn't have the odd brou-ha-ha themselves before than, but the issues it has today is a direct result of Irish vs Irish/English. Then there is the Protestant/Catholic thing, which is also down Irish vs Irish/English..

Yeah, Westie...know your history...

 

[22lcidw]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

Europe did not care
They just wanted to loot Africa of its natural resources
The tribes just got in the way. They did make good slaves though

Its the same mindset that saw the southern states go to war to protect slavery.

In the book I referenced in the OP there is a great story.
The Independence celebrations for Ghana saw reps from most countries show up to celebrate and the US rep was Nixon who was Vice Pres I think. He had a great time and went round the room pressing the flesh and hugging everyone.
He approached a group of people he assumed were Ghanaians and asked them how it felt to be free.

One of them responded " I dont know, Im from Alabama". It was 1957.

There is an alternate history to the battle between the states. Slavery was dying. And would have ended within a decade or so anyway. The war was over the global financiers wanting a fiat currency in the Americas'. A weakened United States was thought to be an avenue to that end. Perhaps two powerful separate nations in the Western Hemisphere but less so would be the ticket to their entrenchment. They kept trying and used the scare of 1907 as the reason to get the politicians to push the federal reserve act of 1913. Right at Christmas break of course. The federal income tax came with it and the same year the 17th amendment was enacted. We shortly started our adventures into foreign wars and incursions. Britain was finished as a world power by the beginning of the 20th century. The United States was the economic power but did not want to be the military one. Then the fiat currency with promises of no recessions and depressions was shoved into law. Two world wars with the transition of power from Britain to the United States both friendly English speaking nations finally achieved in 1945 has given us the world we now have. But that is breaking down as we have corrupted the fiat currency to paying everyone off. China is on the horizon. And they do not speak English. Their goal is world conquest. That is what competition is. And they can do it.

 

[rightwinger]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

Europe did not care
They just wanted to loot Africa of its natural resources
The tribes just got in the way. They did make good slaves though

Its the same mindset that saw the southern states go to war to protect slavery.

In the book I referenced in the OP there is a great story.
The Independence celebrations for Ghana saw reps from most countries show up to celebrate and the US rep was Nixon who was Vice Pres I think. He had a great time and went round the room pressing the flesh and hugging everyone.
He approached a group of people he assumed were Ghanaians and asked them how it felt to be free.

One of them responded " I dont know, Im from Alabama". It was 1957.

There is an alternate history to the battle between the states. Slavery was dying. And would have ended within a decade or so anyway. The war was over the global financiers wanting a fiat currency in the Americas'. A weakened United States was thought to be an avenue to that end. Perhaps two powerful separate nations in the Western Hemisphere but less so would be the ticket to their entrenchment. They kept trying and used the scare of 1907 as the reason to get the politicians to push the federal reserve act of 1913. Right at Christmas break of course. The federal income tax came with it and the same year the 17th amendment was enacted. We shortly started our adventures into foreign wars and incursions. Britain was finished as a world power by the beginning of the 20th century. The United States was the economic power but did not want to be the military one. Then the fiat currency with promises of no recessions and depressions was shoved into law. Two world wars with the transition of power from Britain to the United States both friendly English speaking nations finally achieved in 1945 has given us the world we now have. But that is breaking down as we have corrupted the fiat currency to paying everyone off. China is on the horizon. And they do not speak English. Their goal is world conquest. That is what competition is. And they can do it.

More alternative facts

Slavery was not ending. In fact, the Confederacy was created to ensure slavery would be in place forever

The south preferred to have 300,000 men killed rather than surrender its slaves. Even when slavery was forbidden, they still enacted Jim Crow to ensure that blacks were second class citizens

 

[Tommy Tainant]

My studies continue. Yet to find a nation that was given its release from servitude without violence. Every freedom fighter ever was once considered a terrorist.

 

[Fueri]

I didn't know Whitey ever made it to the dark continent.....

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Tommy is SO all about respecting the self-determination of indigenous peoples.

That is why he has posted countless diatribes against the will of indigenous Brits to leave the EU and is a veritable cheer boi for the importation of a primitive culture seeking to replace that of the diverse indigenous cultures of Europe.

I guess that when a person is only concerned with virtue signalling, such utter hypocrisy is all fine and dandy.

 

[sparky]

Every freedom fighter ever was once considered a terrorist.

Which hasn't changed on this rock much at all.....~S~

 

[Papageorgio]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

The British Empire owes trillions in reparations. All the did was try to conquer and enforce their laws on others. You need to pony up.

 

[Godboy]

My studies continue. Yet to find a nation that was given its release from servitude without violence. Every freedom fighter ever was once considered a terrorist.

WRONG! There is a difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist.

A person who fights for his freedom is not inherently bad. In fact, it is very a noble endeavor in many situations, but just because you are fighting for freedom doesnt mean you arent also a terrorist. A terrorist can sometimes be fighting for freedom, like the terrorists in "Palestine", but that just makes them freedom fighters AND terrorists.

The thing that separates the two is their means of achieving freedom. If you attack civilians to achieve your freedom, you are a terrorist . If you only attack the armed forces that have enslaved you, you are a freedom fighter.

Words have meaning.

 

[IM2]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

What is different from before whitey set foot in the continent? Nada, zip, zero. The place was fucked up before whitey, and it's fucked up now.

And it's blacks butchering and enslaving blacks.

Same as its been for the last 10,000 years.

You are ignorant to the history of Africa. And considering whites have been butchering and enslaving whites for the same amount of time, including two white made world wars, perhaps you might want to shut up.

Ummmm, idiot, it is mankind's nature to kill himself. That is the point. It's not a white or black thing.

The difference is who is trying to stop that cycle. At least whitey is making the attempt.

In Africa the leaders take children, give them guns and have them go butcher people.

Whitey has increased that attempt. Whitey created nukes. Nukes can wipe out humanity.

Whitey makes guns legal for children to use in America. Whitey created instability on the African continent.

 

[IM2]

https://www.amazon.co.uk/State-Afri...targid=pla-456344281800&psc=1&th=1&psc=1&tag=

10,000 different tribes divided neatly into 40 nations bounded by straight lines that divided mountains,rivers and religions. The maps were drawn in Europe by people who had no knowledge of the continent or its people.

What could go wrong ?

The British Empire owes trillions in reparations. All the did was try to conquer and enforce their laws on others. You need to pony up.

America owes trillions in reparations and has done what the british empire has done.