RDD_1210
Forms his own opinions
- May 13, 2010
- 18,981
- 1,817
- 265
Even smart guys can have really fucked up opinions.
He knows how fucked up it is too, hence why he flat out refuses to answer and actually bailed on the thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Even smart guys can have really fucked up opinions.
I'm not sure I have enough time to give all your posts agrees so virtually all of them so far.The State decided in 1972 it is okay to mass murder the unborn.
That doesn't mean I should have to pay for it.
I applaud this move by Congress.
You don't have a right if you need someone else to pay for it.Ah, those pesky religious views which get in the way of the State mass murderingSo religious views should get to dictate federal policy now?Jewsthe unborn. What a pain.
I say the will of the people should dictate policy as long as they don't violate anyone's rights. Planned Parenthood's rights are not being violated if I am not being forced to fund their abortion mills. Sorry.
You seem to think my tax dollars are an entitlement. I say let the voters decide how tax dollars are spent. Thanks to Congress, a state may now decide if they want to give taxpayers' money to abortionists.
So you don't think a woman's rights are being violated when you prevent her from making a choice about her own body?
I do agree though that the voters should decide how they want their tax dollars spent. But not at the expense of taking away the rights of someone.
It sort of was all for SHOW g5000...the vote on this.... so they could say they've done something...Pence delivered the tiebreaking vote on a resolution reversing an Obama administration rule that prevented states from withholding family-planning dollars from Planned Parenthood and other clinics that provide abortions.
<snip>
The measure, a priority for groups that oppose abortion, would give a thumbs-up to Tennessee and other conservative states to resume policies blocking Planned Parenthood clinics from getting federal funding through the Title X family-planning program. Those dollars can’t be used for abortions, but conservatives feel abortion providers shouldn’t receive any taxpayer funds.
You don't have a right if you need someone else to pay for it.Ah, those pesky religious views which get in the way of the State mass murderingSo religious views should get to dictate federal policy now?Jewsthe unborn. What a pain.
I say the will of the people should dictate policy as long as they don't violate anyone's rights. Planned Parenthood's rights are not being violated if I am not being forced to fund their abortion mills. Sorry.
You seem to think my tax dollars are an entitlement. I say let the voters decide how tax dollars are spent. Thanks to Congress, a state may now decide if they want to give taxpayers' money to abortionists.
So you don't think a woman's rights are being violated when you prevent her from making a choice about her own body?
I do agree though that the voters should decide how they want their tax dollars spent. But not at the expense of taking away the rights of someone.
If a right costs you money to have, it's not a fucking right. You may want to read the bill of rights. None of them require you paying to have them or other's paying for you to have them.You don't have a right if you need someone else to pay for it.Ah, those pesky religious views which get in the way of the State mass murderingSo religious views should get to dictate federal policy now?Jewsthe unborn. What a pain.
I say the will of the people should dictate policy as long as they don't violate anyone's rights. Planned Parenthood's rights are not being violated if I am not being forced to fund their abortion mills. Sorry.
You seem to think my tax dollars are an entitlement. I say let the voters decide how tax dollars are spent. Thanks to Congress, a state may now decide if they want to give taxpayers' money to abortionists.
So you don't think a woman's rights are being violated when you prevent her from making a choice about her own body?
I do agree though that the voters should decide how they want their tax dollars spent. But not at the expense of taking away the rights of someone.
So poor people don't have rights, got it.
If a right costs you money to have, it's not a fucking right. You may want to read the bill of rights. None of them require you paying to have them or other's paying for you to have them.You don't have a right if you need someone else to pay for it.Ah, those pesky religious views which get in the way of the State mass murderingSo religious views should get to dictate federal policy now?Jewsthe unborn. What a pain.
I say the will of the people should dictate policy as long as they don't violate anyone's rights. Planned Parenthood's rights are not being violated if I am not being forced to fund their abortion mills. Sorry.
You seem to think my tax dollars are an entitlement. I say let the voters decide how tax dollars are spent. Thanks to Congress, a state may now decide if they want to give taxpayers' money to abortionists.
So you don't think a woman's rights are being violated when you prevent her from making a choice about her own body?
I do agree though that the voters should decide how they want their tax dollars spent. But not at the expense of taking away the rights of someone.
So poor people don't have rights, got it.