How the rest of the world views our "beloved" President

Well he's a republican now.
A rose by any other name.... :banghead:

Yawn! You are here bragging about & defending a failing president.
“Failing” :lmao:

You are here making shit up to advance a failed and bat-shit crazy ideology. You cannot cite a single instance of President Trump “failing” at anything.

All he has done is properly restore power to the states per the U.S. Constitution, secure the border, create over 1 million jobs in only 7 months, implement policy that has caused the stock exchange to reach record numbers, and a whole lot more.

This is a failing presidency that has done none of what you say.
 
Nobody loves dirt bags It's just that even when Republicans know they are they still vote for them

Chappaquiddick_incident-S.jpg


Mayor Marion Barry
MarionBarry-Th.jpg


Mayor Ray Nagin
Ray%20Nagin-S.jpg
 
You talk about a failed system created by liberals. yet your side created a depression. in 2007,

Just to remind all our FRIENDS from the far left, the responsibility for this mess lies with Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. AND WITH REPUBLICANS for backing off every time Barney Frank and his cronies played…THE RACE CARD! The housing bubble is what led to the downfall and that was driven by Democrats, starting with Jimmy Carter and hugely expanded by Bill Clinton. Here are the facts, once again, for you to ignore….

HUD TO FIGHT DISCRIMINATION, BOOST MINORITY HOMEOWNERSHIP AND WORK WITH URBAN LEAGUE TO FURTHER GOALS
August 5, 1997
HUD to Fight Discrimination, Boost Minority Homeownership and Work With Urban League to Further Goals - Free Online Library

New York Times - 1999
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending -
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

President Bush’s and the Administrations Unheeded Warnings About the Systemic Risk Posed by the GSEs – Fannie and Freddie dating back to 2001
Just the Facts: The Administration’s Unheeded Warnings About the Systemic Risk Posed by the GSEs

By Elliot Blair Smith,
USA TODAY
Fannie Mae to pay $400 million fine
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&refer=columnist_hassett&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0

Franklin Raines was Director of the Office of Management and Budget under Clinton and returned to Fannie Mae as its CEO in 1999. Raines is not a “chief” economic adviser for President Barack Hussein Obama but has advised the administration on mortgage and housing matters. Obama had hired another former Fannie CEO, Jim Johnson as a member of Obama’s V.P. search committee and who was forced to quit under fire.

Bloomberg News -
How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis -
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&refer=columnist_hassett&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0

Democrats in their own words covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac


Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Democrats of Financial Crisis


From the New York Times
New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae

By STEPHEN LABATON
Published: September 11, 2003 WASHINGTON,

Sept. 10— The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.

Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.

The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.

The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt -- is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates.

Read more: New Agency Proposed to Oversee Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae
 
You do know that prez Dotard has said that our constitution is outdated and wants to change it don't you.
And? President Trump is as entitled to his opinion and his 1st Amendment rights as much as any other American.

As long as he doesn’t actually change (or violate it like Obama did over and over) then who cares? That’s the problem with you snowflake progressives - words bring you to your knees while actual actions you people are completely blind to.


I am far from a progressive. I do know a huckster con man is in front of me by opening my ears and eyes. You should try it!
 
Yet, they depend on US for their defense.


Whiny ungrateful children.

This is more silly season bullshit. So since you think they depend on us our president has the right to support s group that destabilizes their country.


The people destabilizing their country is the current political class, with their support of massive Third World immigration.


Trump is right to spread information that reveals the damage being done.

Not so. I think the British PM is more capable of saying what's right for her country than you are.


After the Rotherham (and others) rape ring?


Their position is indefensible.

Then you go over to Britain and tell them that.



Can't. Lefties like you would arrest me for saying shit they don't like.


That's how you end up with massive rape rings like in Rotherham.


Because of people like you.
 
You cannot cite a single instance of President Trump “failing” at anything.


You've got to be freaking kidding.........NO ONE can be so dumb as to state the above........Here's just a tiny one of those "failures"...............LOL

"It's a set of promises for what I'll do in my first 100 days. It includes getting rid of immediately Obamacare, which is a disaster," said Trump. The line referencing an "immediate" "repeal and replace" was a staple of his stump speech.

Let me know if you want more........
 
Natalie here being a typical anti-American progressive. More concerned about pacifying other nations than she is concerned about the welfare of the U.S. :eusa_doh:

THIS nation gives him 37 percent approval


fake news, fake poll. the same polls that said Hillary had a 97% chance of winning and that Trump had no path to 270 EC votes. they are lying to you winger, wake up.

Well the fact is that every poll shows pretty much the same numbers. Nobody sane likes Trump.


except the American voters. LOL. you need to remove the tin foil hat and deal with reality. Those polls are lying to you, they lied to you in November 2016 and they are lying to you today.

today's polls are not designed to report on public opinion, they are designed to influence it, and gullible fools like you are unable to see that.

Actually Hillary got the most votes The tin foil hats keep talking like Trump won the popular vote like the nation really put him in to office instead of 300 people in an electoral college primarily from states that had 200,000 eligible voters that were purged from voter rolls. Nobody likes Trump ad the information is not fake.


she won California. Trump won the rest of the nation. The difference in PV numbers is all in one state. That's exactly why we have the electoral college-----------so that one or two states cannot control our elections.

If the election was held again, Trump would win with an even greater margin.

The pollsters are once again lying to you.
 
fake news, fake poll. the same polls that said Hillary had a 97% chance of winning and that Trump had no path to 270 EC votes


Some day....when you grow a few more brain cells....you too would realize that MOST polls gauge POPULAR opinion......and in that the polls were SPOT ON since indeed, Hillary got millions of more votes than the orange clown.

Now, WHY do you idiots keep on bring up the failed candidacy of Hillary when this thread is about the EMBARRASSMENT that trump is causing to us from the rest of the planet???


wrong, sadly the polls are currently not designed to reflect public opinion, they are designed to influence it------------and it works on gullible fools like you.

Hillary did not win even though they told you that she had a 97% chance of winning and that Trump had no path to 270 EC votes. They lied and you are still buying the lies.
 
Only a few countries have positive views of Trump.
Natalie here being a typical anti-American progressive. More concerned about pacifying other nations than she is concerned about the welfare of the U.S. :eusa_doh:

THIS nation gives him 37 percent approval


fake news, fake poll. the same polls that said Hillary had a 97% chance of winning and that Trump had no path to 270 EC votes. they are lying to you winger, wake up.
You have to look at polls at the time they were taken
Polls taken the day before the election had Hillary winning by 3 percent
She won by 2 percent


sorry winger, but she lost, and by a lot more than 2 or 3%. We do not elect by PV. The founders understood that it would be bad if 1 or 2 states could control our elections.
 
You do know that prez Dotard has said that our constitution is outdated and wants to change it don't you.
And? President Trump is as entitled to his opinion and his 1st Amendment rights as much as any other American.

As long as he doesn’t actually change (or violate it like Obama did over and over) then who cares? That’s the problem with you snowflake progressives - words bring you to your knees while actual actions you people are completely blind to.

Obama did mot violate any first amendment anything.. We see he actual actions of Trump loon. That's the problem.
 
Only a few countries have positive views of Trump.
Natalie here being a typical anti-American progressive. More concerned about pacifying other nations than she is concerned about the welfare of the U.S. :eusa_doh:

THIS nation gives him 37 percent approval


fake news, fake poll. the same polls that said Hillary had a 97% chance of winning and that Trump had no path to 270 EC votes. they are lying to you winger, wake up.
You have to look at polls at the time they were taken
Polls taken the day before the election had Hillary winning by 3 percent
She won by 2 percent


sorry winger, but she lost, and by a lot more than 2 or 3%. We do not elect by PV. The founders understood that it would be bad if 1 or 2 states could control our elections.

The reason Trump is getting it is due to the fact that Trump was not selected by the majority of the American people.

The founders did not establish he electoral college because 1-2 states could control anything. Because in this case 1-2 states controlled he electoral vote. They established he electoral college because they thought he regular person was too stupid to elect our own leaders and needed elites to pick their leaders for them.

Trump is not liked. Every poll shows this. Every poll is not wrong.
 

Forum List

Back
Top