How the middle class has fragmented under Obama

Votto

Diamond Member
Oct 31, 2012
53,887
52,789
3,605
How the middle class has fragmented under Obama - Yahoo Finance

When President Obama delivered his first State of the Union address in 2009, 53% of Americans considered themselves middle class. Six years later, just 44% of Americans define themselves that way.

It’s no secret working Americans have been under duress for more than a decade, as wages stagnate, computers and robots displace human workers and wealth becomes concentrated among an alarmingly small portion of the population. Obama has promoted policies meant to help the middle class throughout his six years in office, yet the problem today is quite different than when he started the job in 2009—and it’s not clear Obama fully grasps the change.

The president's latest proposal to aid the middle class is a “Robin Hood” tax plan that would hike taxes on the wealthy to finance tax cuts for lower earners. Transferring money from the rich to the working class through the tax code has been a recurring theme of Obama’s (and many Democrats’) tax proposals. And his latest plan seems no more likely to pass a Republican-controlled Congress than many other ideas that have starred in a State of the Union address, then quietly retired.

The middle class itself, however, has changed notably during the relatively short time Obama has been in office, as the chart below shows. The portion of Americans who consider themselves middle class has dropped (as has the portion considering themselves upper class), while the ranks who call themselves lower class have swelled.

Percentage of adults self-identifying as each social class:

Harris “alienation index ”—which measures satisfaction with five different elements of public life—at the worst level in the poll’s 39-year history. The government’s approval ratings remain close to record lows, and a startling majority of Americans still feel the nation is headed in the wrong direction.

What’s striking about the sour mood is that it has persisted throughout an economic recovery that’s now in its sixth year, with 2014 being an especially strong year for job growth. Obama has correctly identified many economic factors that dog working families—such as flat pay, a shortage of digital-era skills, and the high cost of child care, college and healthcare—but there’s something else going on that Obama’s various proposals for the middle class don’t capture: Too many Americans seem to be losing hope in a bright economic future.

[Get the Latest Market Data and News with the Yahoo Finance App]

There's no set definition of "middle class." It might consist of families between the 25th and 75th income percentiles, or between the 20th and 80th income percentiles, which would roughly equate with household income ranging from $25,000 to $105,000. But there are many subjective factors that contribute to a middle-class lifestyle and aren’t easily measured. Many people with incomes in the top 10% of earners, for instance, consider themselves middle class, because they work for their income instead of living off investments and come from modest circumstances.

A 2010 report commissioned by Obama himself declared that “middle-class families are defined by their aspirations more than their income.” And it’s those aspirations that may be the most threatened element of a middle-class lifestyle today.

The 2010 White House report identified six principal things middle-class families aspire to. Examining them one by one helps explain why Americans are down on their prospects. Here are the six essentials of middle-class living:

Owning a home. The homeownership rate has historically been around 64%, but it peaked at 69% during the housing boom and drifted back to about 67% by the time Obama took office in 2009. It has since fallen further, to around 64%. That’s OK from a historical perspective, but because it’s been going down, not up, a lot of former homeowners feel terribly displaced, while many other potential buyers can’t qualify for a mortgage. Renters have more mobility than homeowners, which is a good thing these days, but ownership is clearly more difficult than it used to be for most people.

Owning a car. Auto sales have been strong, suggesting this important element of middle-class living remains intact.

College education for the kids. Big problem. A college degree is more important than ever, yet the cost of college has been rising by nearly three times the rate of inflation since 2009. No wonder the amount of student debt has soared by 58% during that time, to a staggering $1.3 trillion.

Health security. The scorecard is mixed. The Affordable Care Act has helped several million people who didn’t previously have health insurance get it. At the same time, deductibles and out-of-pocket costs have shot up during the last several years, adding to the healthcare burden for many middle-class people who otherwise have stable coverage.

Retirement security. The twin stock-market and housing busts that greeted Obama in 2009 trashed retirement planning for millions. That has improved somewhat during the last several years, yet more than half of retirement-age households face serious financial risk. That’s up sharply from pre-recession levels -- and a potential crisis in the making.

Occasional family vacations. Americans take less vacation now than at any time on record. Some employees suffer from a “work martyr complex,” according to one study, leading them to take less time off than their employers allow. Many lower-income workers, meanwhile, don’t get any paid time off at all. If we’re a prosperous nation, it’s not evident in the way we spend our free time.

Of those six middle-class aspirations, four are further out of reach than when Obama took office in 2009. Two others are arguably the same or a bit better: Healthcare is more attainable for some, and a combination of low interest rates and permissive lending have kept America’s driveways filled with fresh autos.

Most of Obama’s proposals for strengthening the middle class are fairly mainstream ideas backed by reputable economists. What’s harder to assess is whether Obama’s style of leadership inspires middle-class ambition and the spirit of self-improvement long associated with it. The declining portion of Americans who consider themselves to be the backbone of the U.S. economy suggests—not really.
 
So what is the Dim solution to all this? Hillary, that's what.

Clinton campaign to focus on economic security opportunity - Yahoo News

CHICAGO (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton's presidential campaign will center on boosting economic security for the middle class and expanding opportunities for working families, while casting the former senator and secretary of state as a "tenacious fighter" able to get results, two senior advisers said Saturday. President Barack Obama all but endorsed her, saying "I think she would be an excellent president."

The senior advisers provided the first preview of the message Clinton planned to convey when she launches her long-anticipated campaign on Sunday with an online video. Until now, the former first lady has offered only hints of what would drive her if she were to run a second time for the White House.

The strategy described by Clinton's advisers has echoes of Obama's 2012 re-election campaign. He framed the choice for voters as between Democrats focused on the middle class and Republicans wanting to protect the wealthy and return to policies that led to the 2008 economic collapse.

The advisers said Clinton will argue that voters have a similar choice in 2016. Clinton also intends to sell herself as being able to work with Congress, businesses and world leaders.

That approach could be perceived as a critique of Obama, Clinton's rival for the nomination in 2008. He has largely been unable to fulfill his pledge to end Washington's intense partisanship and found much of his presidency stymied by gridlock with Congress.

The Clinton advisers spoke on condition of anonymity in order to discuss her plans ahead of Sunday's announcement. People familiar with the plans say Clinton will travel to Iowa and other early-voting states to hold small events with residents in the days after the video's release.

View gallery

Supporters listen to a speech during the Last Hillary Clinton Rally in New York, Saturday, April 11, …
In New York on Saturday, at the final event put on by "Ready for Hillary," a group not connected with her campaign that's worked for the past few years to stoke excitement for it, enthusiastic supporters joined elected officials and local party leaders to celebrate the launch to come.

"After she left the State Department she could have slipped into grandmother-hood, but people want to call her back into public service," said Jarret Berg, 29, a Democratic staffer in the New York legislature. "It's time for her."

As her official announcement loomed, the Republican National Committee linked Clinton to Obama, a regular focus of criticism from the GOP. "All Hillary Clinton is offering is a continuation of the same big government ideas that have grown Washington instead of the middle class," RNC spokesman Michael Short said in a statement. "That's why voters want fresh leadership and a new direction, not four more years of Obama's failed policies."

Clinton is not expected to roll out detailed policy positions in the first weeks of her campaign. Advisers said she planned to talk about ways families can increase take-home pay, the importance of expanding early childhood education and making higher education more affordable.

It's not yet clear whether that will include a noticeable break with Obama on economic policy. The GOP has hammered Obama's approach as anti-business and insufficient in the wake of the recession. The White House says the economy has improved significantly in recent years.

View gallery

Supporters listen during a speech at the "Last Hillary Clinton Rally" as part of the Ready …
The unemployment rate fell to 5.5 percent in March, but manufacturing and new home construction slowed, cheaper gas has yet to ignite consumer spending and participation in the labor force remains sluggish.

Clinton will enter the race as the overwhelming favorite for her party's nomination. Still, her team has said her early strategy is designed to avoid appearing to take that nomination for granted.

Clinton received an early boost Saturday from Obama, who was asked if he would be involved in her expected campaign.

"She was a formidable candidate in 2008. She was a great supporter of mine in the general election. She was an outstanding secretary of state. She is my friend. I think she would be an excellent president, and I'm not on the ballot so I'm not going to step on her lines," Obama said from Panama City as he wrapped up participation in a summit of Western Hemisphere leaders.

Clinton's early events will include discussions at colleges, day care centers and private homes, and stops at coffee shops and diners. After about a month of such events, Clinton will give a broader speech outlining more specifics about her rationale for running.

View gallery

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., left, calls out to supporters during the "Last Hillary Clinton Ra …
Clinton's husband, Bill, and daughter, Chelsea, are unlikely to appear at her early events. Bill Clinton, the former two-term president, said recently that he wanted to play a role as a "backstage adviser" in his wife's campaign. Advisers said Bill Clinton has been engaged with his wife in some of the policy discussions leading up to this weekend's rollout.

To prepare for the campaign, Clinton has spent months meeting with economic policy experts, including Heather Boushey, whose research focuses on inequality, and Teresa Ghilarducci, a labor economist and retirement policy expert. The policy development process has been overseen by aides Jake Sullivan and Dan Schwerin.

In the days before her announcement, Clinton has been holding lengthy meetings with her staff, sometimes joining them at her crowded personal offices in midtown Manhattan and other times participating by phone. She is expected to reach out to donors in the coming weeks, but does not plan to headline many fundraising events over the next month.

Clinton's growing team of staffers began working Friday out of a new campaign headquarters in Brooklyn. They gathered Saturday to hear from campaign manager-in-waiting Robby Mook, who told them the campaign would value teamwork, diversity, discipline and humility.

Mook distributed a memo titled "We are Hillary for America" that included several guiding principles, including a vow to work together and respect each other. The campaign, the memo said, "is not about Hillary Clinton and not about us — it's about the everyday Americans who are trying to build a better life for themselves and their families."

View gallery

Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., left, speaks to members of the media during an event called the Last H …
The meeting was described by a Democratic official in attendance who spoke on condition of anonymity to describe a private strategy session. The memo was first reported by Politico.

___

Associated Press writers Jonathan Lemire in New York and Ken Thomas in Washington contributed to this report.

___
 
You mean since the Bush GREAT RECESSION/ real estate boom/bust/ Wall Street crash more people are in poverty?
 
I'm personally tired of the same old crap. You have Dims saying they want to help the middle class, while just passing Obamacare which was the greatest tax burden on the middle class in US history, and proposing more and more redistribution to "fix" it all again.

Meanwhile, the GOP is the scapegoat every single time as they are held to be the ones that are at the source of all these troubles.

The funny thing is, there seems to always be just enough to perpetuate the demise of the middle class, that is, unless you count the first two years of the Obama administration when Dims had complete control over every aspect of the government. Of course, that did not go so well for them, did it?

I have a theory that Dims secretly want just enough in the GOP to be in office to blame for the continued demise of the middle class, as they preach more and more redistribution.
 
Last edited:
You mean since the Bush GREAT RECESSION/ real estate boom/bust/ Wall Street crash more people are in poverty?

Yes, we know it's all Bush's fault.

Thanks for that.
 
College education for the kids. Big problem. A college degree is more important than ever, yet the cost of college has been rising by nearly three times the rate of inflation since 2009. No wonder the amount of student debt has soared by 58% during that time, to a staggering $1.3 trillion.

This is one of many issues that continue to plague the middle class. All we hear from the Dims is how interest rates need to come down in order for students to be able to afford those bigger and bigger loans. In fact, government has pretty much taken over this job all by its lonesome. Then we hear Obama say that the first two years of community college should be paid for by the taxpayers.

The first approach of making interest rates lower so students can afford a bigger and bigger loan can only go so far. Eventually the massive debt will not make since financially, especially in an increasingly stagnant economy. As for the later approach of the government increasing debt to pay for the first two years of community college, this just increases inflation, that ultimately hurts the poor the most.

There is virtually no talk of grabbing the gonads of these fat cat universities and forcing them to bring their tuition rates down. Why?

I've always said that government and higher education have a symbiotic relationship. The relationship is, government protects their bottom line as universities indoctrinate the students with leftist ideologies of government "fixing" everything.
 
The middle class will not last forever. Eventually there will be only gods and slaves.​
 
The ACA actually SAVES money for the middle class. How many people lost their homes due to healthcare bills in the past 12 months compared to the previous 12 months?

And all that tl;dr that you posted is so much boring propaganda, everyone knows that the tax rates for the wealthy are lower than for their employees, plus the rich have numerous tax shelters that the middle class are denied.

The "poor widdle mistreated one percent" line of crap never was believable.

OP fail.
 

Most of Obama’s proposals for strengthening the middle class are fairly mainstream ideas backed by reputable economists. What’s harder to assess is whether Obama’s style of leadership inspires middle-class ambition and the spirit of self-improvement long associated with it. The declining portion of Americans who consider themselves to be the backbone of the U.S. economy suggests—not really.

the middle class is getting crushed by rightwing policies and the do-nothing congress' continuous efforts to create a low cost job market to further enrich the top 1%
 
I'm personally tired of the same old crap. You have Dims saying they want to help the middle class, while just passing Obamacare which was the greatest tax burden on the middle class in US history, and proposing more and more redistribution to "fix" it all again.

Meanwhile, the GOP is the scapegoat every single time as they are held to be the ones that are at the source of all these troubles.

The funny thing is, there seems to always be just enough to perpetuate the demise of the middle class, that is, unless you count the first two years of the Obama administration when Dims had complete control over every aspect of the government. Of course, that did not go so well for them, did it?

I have a theory that Dims secretly want just enough in the GOP to be in office to blame for the continued demise of the middle class, as they preach more and more redistribution.

There would be no middle class without FDR, the New Deal and the policies of Democrats. Ronald Reagan and Republican policies since have almost decimated the working folks.

Somethings will never change...

"Republicans approve of the American farmer, but they are willing to help him go broke. They stand four-square for the American home--but not for housing. They are strong for labor--but they are stronger for restricting labor's rights. They favor minimum wage--the smaller the minimum wage the better. They endorse educational opportunity for all--but they won't spend money for teachers or for schools. They approve of social security benefits-so much so that they took them away from almost a million people. They think modern medical care and hospitals are fine--for people who can afford them. They believe in international trade--so much so that they crippled our reciprocal trade program, and killed our International Wheat Agreement. They favor the admission of displaced persons--but only within shameful racial and religious limitations.They consider electrical power a great blessing--but only when the private power companies get their rake-off. They say TVA is wonderful--but we ought never to try it again. They condemn "cruelly high prices"--but fight to the death every effort to bring them down. They think American standard of living is a fine thing--so long as it doesn't spread to all the people. And they admire of Government of the United States so much that they would like to buy it."
President Harry S. Truman - October 13, 1948
 
I'm personally tired of the same old crap. You have Dims saying they want to help the middle class, while just passing Obamacare which was the greatest tax burden on the middle class in US history, and proposing more and more redistribution to "fix" it all again.

Meanwhile, the GOP is the scapegoat every single time as they are held to be the ones that are at the source of all these troubles.

The funny thing is, there seems to always be just enough to perpetuate the demise of the middle class, that is, unless you count the first two years of the Obama administration when Dims had complete control over every aspect of the government. Of course, that did not go so well for them, did it?

I have a theory that Dims secretly want just enough in the GOP to be in office to blame for the continued demise of the middle class, as they preach more and more redistribution.

Don't forget flooding the workforce with illegals, driving down wages and the overall standard of living, all for the purpose of adding tens of millions of potential voters who will of course overwhelmingly vote Democrat. These seditious liberals don't give a rat's ass about the middle class as we know it.

The idiot Republicans who don't have the balls to stand up for the citizens who are here legally and think that by kissing up to the uneducated, unskilled entitlement seeking illegals are just as guilty and even more foolish.
They are pretty much facilitating the extinction of their own political party.
 

Most of Obama’s proposals for strengthening the middle class are fairly mainstream ideas backed by reputable economists. What’s harder to assess is whether Obama’s style of leadership inspires middle-class ambition and the spirit of self-improvement long associated with it. The declining portion of Americans who consider themselves to be the backbone of the U.S. economy suggests—not really.

the middle class is getting crushed by rightwing policies and the do-nothing congress' continuous efforts to create a low cost job market to further enrich the top 1%

I propose that both parties wish to destroy the middle class.

Looking at human history, the middle class is a relatively new phenomenon. World history dictates that you have a small elite ruling class and the rest of them slaves.

This appears to be the natural state of man.
 
I'm personally tired of the same old crap. You have Dims saying they want to help the middle class, while just passing Obamacare which was the greatest tax burden on the middle class in US history, and proposing more and more redistribution to "fix" it all again.

Meanwhile, the GOP is the scapegoat every single time as they are held to be the ones that are at the source of all these troubles.

The funny thing is, there seems to always be just enough to perpetuate the demise of the middle class, that is, unless you count the first two years of the Obama administration when Dims had complete control over every aspect of the government. Of course, that did not go so well for them, did it?

I have a theory that Dims secretly want just enough in the GOP to be in office to blame for the continued demise of the middle class, as they preach more and more redistribution.

Don't forget flooding the workforce with illegals, driving down wages and the overall standard of living, all for the purpose of adding tens of millions of potential voters who will of course overwhelmingly vote Democrat. These seditious liberals don't give a rat's ass about the middle class as we know it.

The idiot Republicans who don't have the balls to stand up for the citizens who are here legally and think that by kissing up to the uneducated, unskilled entitlement seeking illegals are just as guilty and even more foolish.
They are pretty much facilitating the extinction of their own political party.

Idiot Republicans? Are they idiots or are those who support them doing nothing the idiots?
 

Most of Obama’s proposals for strengthening the middle class are fairly mainstream ideas backed by reputable economists. What’s harder to assess is whether Obama’s style of leadership inspires middle-class ambition and the spirit of self-improvement long associated with it. The declining portion of Americans who consider themselves to be the backbone of the U.S. economy suggests—not really.

the middle class is getting crushed by rightwing policies and the do-nothing congress' continuous efforts to create a low cost job market to further enrich the top 1%

I propose that both parties wish to destroy the middle class.

Looking at human history, the middle class is a relatively new phenomenon. World history dictates that you have a small elite ruling class and the rest of them slaves.

This appears to be the natural state of man.

your proposal would be incorrect given the policies fostered by both parties. you know, like the constant rightwing fight against a living wage, against, health care, against collective bargaining. you ignore all of the pro-wealth positions of the right. interesting.

the middle class only exists because of the protection of government policy. the natural result of capitalism is a low-paid, miserable working class a la dickensian england and feudal societies.
 
I simply don't buy that the Dims wish to save the middle class, and here is why.

The Dim philosophy has always been a paternal view. People eat too much, drink too much, spend too much, pollute too much, etc. Their complete focus is depriving us of freedoms, especially when it comes to the free market.

What they really want is to build a big fence around the nation and regulate us to death.

In fact, prison is a Dim utopia. Everyone eats the same, dresses the same, lives in the same building, etc. In fact, every day is gay pride day.
 

Most of Obama’s proposals for strengthening the middle class are fairly mainstream ideas backed by reputable economists. What’s harder to assess is whether Obama’s style of leadership inspires middle-class ambition and the spirit of self-improvement long associated with it. The declining portion of Americans who consider themselves to be the backbone of the U.S. economy suggests—not really.

the middle class is getting crushed by rightwing policies and the do-nothing congress' continuous efforts to create a low cost job market to further enrich the top 1%

I propose that both parties wish to destroy the middle class.

Looking at human history, the middle class is a relatively new phenomenon. World history dictates that you have a small elite ruling class and the rest of them slaves.

This appears to be the natural state of man.

your proposal would be incorrect given the policies fostered by both parties. you know, like the constant rightwing fight against a living wage, against, health care, against collective bargaining. you ignore all of the pro-wealth positions of the right. interesting.

the middle class only exists because of the protection of government policy. the natural result of capitalism is a low-paid, miserable working class a la dickensian england and feudal societies.

The reason I'm ignoring the GOP is that the change proposed is to just elect Hillary.

I'm convinced she will win. She has been appointed by the ruling elite in both parties as our next "Messiah"
 
I'm personally tired of the same old crap. You have Dims saying they want to help the middle class, while just passing Obamacare which was the greatest tax burden on the middle class in US history, and proposing more and more redistribution to "fix" it all again.

Meanwhile, the GOP is the scapegoat every single time as they are held to be the ones that are at the source of all these troubles.

The funny thing is, there seems to always be just enough to perpetuate the demise of the middle class, that is, unless you count the first two years of the Obama administration when Dims had complete control over every aspect of the government. Of course, that did not go so well for them, did it?

I have a theory that Dims secretly want just enough in the GOP to be in office to blame for the continued demise of the middle class, as they preach more and more redistribution.

It is kinda of funny, in a sad way, how democrats talk like they know exactly what is wrong and exactly what to do about it, yet they never seemed to get around to doing it.

Instead they take over 1/6th of the economy. Welcome with open arms millions who apply downward pressure on wages and then they have the gall to blame the party that was not in the majority. That is why the democrats got their ass handed to them in 2016 and will in 2018 except they have allowed a whole host of illegal voters into the country.
 

Most of Obama’s proposals for strengthening the middle class are fairly mainstream ideas backed by reputable economists. What’s harder to assess is whether Obama’s style of leadership inspires middle-class ambition and the spirit of self-improvement long associated with it. The declining portion of Americans who consider themselves to be the backbone of the U.S. economy suggests—not really.

the middle class is getting crushed by rightwing policies and the do-nothing congress' continuous efforts to create a low cost job market to further enrich the top 1%

I propose that both parties wish to destroy the middle class.

Looking at human history, the middle class is a relatively new phenomenon. World history dictates that you have a small elite ruling class and the rest of them slaves.

This appears to be the natural state of man.

your proposal would be incorrect given the policies fostered by both parties. you know, like the constant rightwing fight against a living wage, against, health care, against collective bargaining. you ignore all of the pro-wealth positions of the right. interesting.

the middle class only exists because of the protection of government policy. the natural result of capitalism is a low-paid, miserable working class a la dickensian england and feudal societies.

The reason I'm ignoring the GOP is that the change proposed is to just elect Hillary.

I'm convinced she will win. She has been appointed by the ruling elite in both parties as our next "Messiah"

that's irrational...
 

Forum List

Back
Top