Agreed - anything that stops what progressives call "progess" can only be a good thing."the most conservative Congress in over 100 years has stopped Washington dead in its tracks."
My prayers have been answered. Thank you Lord.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Agreed - anything that stops what progressives call "progess" can only be a good thing."the most conservative Congress in over 100 years has stopped Washington dead in its tracks."
My prayers have been answered. Thank you Lord.
Quite honestly, that isnt a reflection of something wrong with filibusters so much as its a reflection of an the end of a sense of bipartisanship in the Senate, on both sides of the aisle. Eliminating the filibuster (which isnt going to happen) will do nothing to address the root causes of the problem.
When the people vote for their reps they vote for them to go to congress and get things done.
Why does one party have the right to distroy that founders plan?
It's pretty clear that the truth does NOT matter...You dont have any answer to that do you?
Is the current use by the republicans the intentions of the founders?
Yes, it is.
Just because you don't understand doesn't mean that everyone else doesn't.
TM doesn't understand much.... I wouldn't waste my time. She's either a raging alcoholic or severely retarded.
yes you like it when the founders wishes are subverted
more "your a poppy pants" defenses in place of facts
You have proved that I am a hyper-partisan hack that doesn't read my own links.
yes you like it when the founders wishes are subverted
I suggest, based on your past postings, that you wouldn't know what the founders wished if they rolled out of their graves and bit you on the ass.
yes you like it when the founders wishes are subverted
I suggest, based on your past postings, that you wouldn't know what the founders wished if they rolled out of their graves and bit you on the ass.
Now which party has sent it to the moon with their blockage of all things the majority wants?
their blockage of all things the majority wants
Which party began using this tacitc and has now sent its practice to the moon?
Now which party has sent it to the moon with their blockage of all things the majority wants?
How many times do we have to explain Checks and Balances ?
.
Where in the Consitution is the Fillibuster Rule?
So you did not have a problem with it when the Dems used it, but now all of a sudden you do?
How many times do we have to explain Checks and Balances ?
.
Where in the Consitution is the Fillibuster Rule?
You need to study a bit. If you'd do that you'd discover that each house is granted the Constitutionally explicit authority to craft its OWN rules.Art. I, Section 5.
* * * *
Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings . . . .
That's the Constitutional basis for a filibuster -- which need not be referenced in that precise word for it to be authorized BY the Constitution.
Now which party has sent it to the moon with their blockage of all things the majority wants?
Democrat Senator Harry Reid and the Senate Dem's who won't vote him out as leader.
The Senate could be discussing and voting on the House bills, adding their own bills right now, if they would do this, and put a more bipartisan Senate Leader in place.
Can anyone tell her the Republicans are not the minority in Congress?? I apparently don't speak her jibberish.
The DEMS don't have a majority in congress.