How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

[ding]

I assume, like your inability to explain a map of the Arctic, that means

YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT




Translation - I am a parrot of lies and I hate it when you refute those lies, so I make shit up to avoid answering questions and debating data...

Surely you are aware of how poorly you communicate, right?

 

[EMH]

Surely you are aware of how poorly you communicate, right?

The OP documents all current measures of ice age glaciers. It takes an IQ over 30 to comprehend it....

 

[ding]

The OP documents all current measures of ice age glaciers. It takes an IQ over 30 to comprehend it....

You are an extremely poor communicator.

 

[EMH]

You are an extremely poor communicator.

Explain what you do NOT understand of the OP on this one...

4. ice cores

antarctic ice cores years - Google Search
The oldest continuous ice core records to date extend 123,000 years in Greenland and 800,000 years in Antarctica. Ice cores contain information about past temperature, and about many other aspects of the environment


And hence it is fair to say that the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Antarctica is WAY OLDER than 75k years... to put it mildly.

Even the Greenland ice is way older than that too, and it has yet to get to 2 miles thick

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Your tactic is to endlessly claim "evidence" and hope nobody checks the OP and sees the OP has all the EVIDENCE any sane person of science would required to conclude McBullshit is BULLSHIT.

Dag's tactic is to lie and change the question.

Do you two do it DAGGY STYLE???

You have never posted any evidence or any source that agrees with your crazy claim
that Chicago was covered with ice for 30-50 million years until 20,000 years ago.

 

[EMH]

You have never posted any evidence or any source that agrees with your crazy claim
that Chicago was covered with ice for 30-50 million years until 20,000 years ago.

The entire OP address all the data on that issue, and demonstrates that claims it was not 30-50 million years old were off by at least a factor of 10 on all measures of ice age glacier today.

Your side thinks ice ages are fast like Dennis Quaid.

Then why the word GLACIAL....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The entire OP address all the data on that issue, and demonstrates that claims it was not 30-50 million years old were off by at least a factor of 10 on all measures of ice age glacier today.

Your side thinks ice ages are fast like Dennis Quaid.

Then why the word GLACIAL....

None of your posted data backs your claim.
It should be easy, find a source that says Chicago was under a glacier, non-stop,
for 30-50 million years. But you can't do it. Does that make you feel like a failure?

 

[EMH]

find a source that says Chicago was under a glacier, non-stop,
for 30-50 million years. But you can't do it. Does that make you feel like a failure?

Not at all. There are books written prior to 2010 that stated the truth.

In the maps section the term North American Ice Age still links the correct maps.

What the Co2 fraud has done since 2010 is re-write plate tectonics and climate history to try to get away from the


Greenland froze while North America thawed

PROOF that Co2 does nothing...



The Co2 fraud controls billions $ and is a complete lie. To cover for that, it censors and erases and fudges, and then depends on complete morons who do not practice actual science or have any analytical ability at all to "find a source" since they deleted all of them. They've even deleted most of the "where is Earth ice" websites. It used to be easy to get

AA 90%
Greenland 7%
Ellesmere 0.3%

and now it is almost impossible through Google or Bing.... why??

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not at all. There are books written prior to 2010 that stated the truth.

In the maps section the term North American Ice Age still links the correct maps.

What the Co2 fraud has done since 2010 is re-write plate tectonics and climate history to try to get away from the


Greenland froze while North America thawed

PROOF that Co2 does nothing...



The Co2 fraud controls billions $ and is a complete lie. To cover for that, it censors and erases and fudges, and then depends on complete morons who do not practice actual science or have any analytical ability at all to "find a source" since they deleted all of them. They've even deleted most of the "where is Earth ice" websites. It used to be easy to get

AA 90%
Greenland 7%
Ellesmere 0.3%

and now it is almost impossible through Google or Bing.... why??

There are books written prior to 2010 that stated the truth.

Post your evidence from one of those.

 

[EMH]

There are books written prior to 2010 that stated the truth.

Post your evidence from one of those.

Go to a library, some may still be there.


Or, even better, find one written BEFORE 2010....

 

[ding]

Explain what you do NOT understand of the OP on this one...

I have no idea of what you are talking about.

 

[EMH]

I have no idea of what you are talking about.

Sorry, but it does require an IQ over 5....

 

[ding]

Sorry, but it does require an IQ over 5....

And the reason you can't explain it.

 

[EMH]

And the reason you can't explain it.

The question is WHAT about the OP do you not understand....

If you can read at a 5th grade level, the OP shouldn't be that hard....

 

[EMH]

Milankovich Cycles are complete bullshit, proven so, and nobody has refuted that proof....