How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

[westwall]

written after homO went silent for two years...

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

www.google.com

Because the Co2 fraud could not explain how Co2 melted North America and froze Greenland AT THE SAME TIME....

The FBI told homO it was ready to prosecute the climate "scientists" for fraud. homO hid that in the closet. THAT is why Donald Trump was CERTAIN Co2 was fraud. Then Trump picked Zionist Fascist Jeff Sessions as AG, and got a special prosecutor over the Russia fraud.... YOUR HEROES AT WORK

You fucking clod I have said global warming is a fraud for over 10 years here.

Wake the fuck up.

 

[EMH]

I have said global warming is a fraud for over 10 years here.

What an IMBECILE!!!

You are taking Algore's side here, MORON.

McBullshit is all a recent "theory" to erase the truth that


GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED


North American Ice Age was 30-50 million years, not 75k.


Even homO and Big Mike realized they were made... and had to COOK SOMETHING UP to cover up THE TRUTH.

 

[westwall]

What an IMBECILE!!!

You are taking Algore's side here, MORON.

McBullshit is all a recent "theory" to erase the truth that


GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED


North American Ice Age was 30-50 million years, not 75k.


Even homO and Big Mike realized they were made... and had to COOK SOMETHING UP to cover up THE TRUTH.

Jeezus you are a loon.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Evidence?





Once again you lie. You do not like the evidence, that is your problem...





Um, no it wasn't because there was no ice on Greenland and less ice on Antarctica. As North America thawed, Greenland's ice age started, and Antarctic ice age continued to grow, and is still growing.







Only parroting matters to those of inferior intellect.

Um, no it wasn't because there was no ice on Greenland and less ice on Antarctica.

Wow! A new silly claim.

Please post your evidence that while there was ice on Chicago for 50 million years
there was no ice on Greenland.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Jeezus you are a loon.

He's nuttier than 10 pounds of squirrel shit in a 5-pound bag.

 

[westwall]

Um, no it wasn't because there was no ice on Greenland and less ice on Antarctica.

Wow! A new silly claim.

Please post your evidence that while there was ice on Chicago for 50 million years
there was no ice on Greenland.

It's like he has no concept of time.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It's like he has no concept of time.

Well, his evidence was out there, until 2010 when Obama and the Jews hid it all.

Now he's the only one who remembers pre-2010 info about glaciers.

He's a very special person. It will be a shame when the Mossad finally finds him.

 

[EMH]

Um, no it wasn't because there was no ice on Greenland and less ice on Antarctica.

Wow! A new silly claim.

Please post your evidence that while there was ice on Chicago for 50 million years
there was no ice on Greenland.

Over and over again.

Data posted.

Toddster trolls saying "no evidence"

 

[EMH]

When you have no evidence, you resort to trolling, to shouting down, to posting right under the data and evidence posted that there is "no evidence"

Truth be told, the mods are certifiable here. If the mods allow this type of lying, these Zionist Fascist punks will keep doing it. Why? Because the mods allow it.

The data and evidence is all throughout the topic, starting in the OP.

The argument that Greenland was ice free 2 million years ago is right in the OP, that DNA from northern Greenland dates back to 2 million years.

Response = no evidence, you are a loon

And this is where the Co2 fraud is right now, two psuedocons who are really Zionist Fascist Traitors who DO SUPPORT the Co2 fraud because it enables Zionist Fascism to steal our money and our rights and our freedoms over fraud. Why stop there? Zionist Fascism has done this and gotten away with it since it offed JFK in 1963. These two traitors, Toddster and westwall, are mental inferiors who LOST this debate badly. The one piece, the ONE piece of actual "Evidence" they provide is a STUDY, a taxpayer funded study, that claims wood left outside for 20,000 years did NOT DECOMPOSE.

LOL!!

They cannot dispute any of it. Greenland was completely green 2 million years ago and there is NO EVIDENCE that it was ever frozen prior to that. Why? Because Greenland was further SOUTH tectonically aka WARMER.

The McBullshit argument they defend, which defends the Co2 fraud, is that the North American Ice Age took 75k years to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaciers on Chicago. Funny, the OP documents that the only glaciers today that are 2.5 miles thick, the ones on Antarctica, had 800k years of ice core data extracted.

You read that right, they are arguing that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago in the past 2 million years was only 75k years old. What does the DATA from Antarctica say? WAY MORE THAN 800k.


And that is why they resort to these tactics. Toddster and westwall claim to be conservative and against the Co2 fraud. They are neither. They shout down 911 truth because they HATE TRUTH, they have NO PATRIOTISM to America, and they love it when the overwhelmingly JEWISH "climate scientists" are bilking the hell out of us...


Can they refute that all land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age - aka buried under ice? NO

Can they refute the data from Greenland documenting that the speed of the Greenland ice age was about 1 mile per 1000 years? NO

Can they document any EVIDENCE to support McBullshit? Laughably, that's the "study" claiming 20k year old wood did not decompose in nature


So we get this, and the mods allow it, because several of the Mods are ZIONIST FASCIST themselves, and care not about truth, America, or anything except their own demographic that is wrecking America....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

And the issue of wood decomposing in 100 years outs the "study" as complete fraud and puts Toddster...

on the canvass....


Lights out on the issue of McBullshit....

How long does it take a soil sample to decompose? DURR

 

[EMH]

How long does it take a soil sample to decompose? DURR

LOL!!!

Your fudged fraud of a "study" said wood, idiot. How long does it take wood to decompose??

30k years? That's a McBullshit answer for sure. Try...

wood decomposition time - Google Search

www.google.com

Wood from trees, like stumps, branches, and limbs will take a very long time to decompose, upwards of 50-100 years if left whole.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

Your fudged fraud of a "study" said wood, idiot. How long does it take wood to decompose??

30k years? That's a McBullshit answer for sure. Try...

wood decomposition time - Google Search

www.google.com

Wood from trees, like stumps, branches, and limbs will take a very long time to decompose, upwards of 50-100 years if left whole.

I know.....it's crazy!
You still have no evidence.
How long does it take for a soil sample to decompose?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

LOL!!!

Your fudged fraud of a "study" said wood, idiot. How long does it take wood to decompose??

30k years? That's a McBullshit answer for sure. Try...

wood decomposition time - Google Search

www.google.com

Wood from trees, like stumps, branches, and limbs will take a very long time to decompose, upwards of 50-100 years if left whole.

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[EMH]

View attachment 812256

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

WOOD and soil samples.

If they had just claimed soil samples and not wood, it WOULD have been harder to BUST THEIR LIES...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

WOOD and soil samples.

If they had just claimed soil samples and not wood, it WOULD have been harder to BUST THEIR LIES...

Still waiting for your evidence. Is it still hidden? Are they all plotting against you?

 

[EMH]

Still waiting for your evidence. Is it still hidden? Are they all plotting against you?

Your tactic is to endlessly claim "evidence" and hope nobody checks the OP and sees the OP has all the EVIDENCE any sane person of science would required to conclude McBullshit is BULLSHIT.

Dag's tactic is to lie and change the question.

Do you two do it DAGGY STYLE???

 

[ding]

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is just me now, since all of the pre 2010 reports on North American Ice Age online have been "canceled" and replaced by McBullshit, is that North America was covered with Ice Age glacier down to Chicago and beyond for 30-50 million years.


So we have a dispute, a healthy thing for SCIENCE...

What is the EVIDENCE???


1. LIFE

Any evidence of LIFE on Chicago for the past 50 million years .... NO

Any evidence of LIFE on Greenland.... YES

Ancient Greenland Was Actually Green

Greenland was once carpeted in lush forests, a new study shows.

www.livescience.com

The DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetle

A 2-million-year-old ecosystem in Greenland uncovered by environmental DNA - Nature

Analysis of two-million-year-old ancient environmental DNA from the Kap København Formation in North Greenland shows there was an open boreal forest with diverse plant and animal species, of which several taxa have not previously been detected at the site, representing an ecosystem that has no...

www.nature.com

So it is fair to say that the ice covering Greenland started up north in the past 2 million years, got to the middle of Greenland 400-800k years ago, and flushed out the Vikings in the 1400s on the southern tip, since when the Vikings found the Southern Tip of Greenland, they called it GREENland because it was green and were able to farm there for centuries before the Greenland ice age pushed them off...


Any evidence of life on Antarctica?

antarctic dinosaurs 70 million years ago - Google Search

This Cretaceous period dinosaur lived about 70 million years ago, towards the end of the Mesozoic Era. A bipedal, long-necked, plant-eating dinosaur (a sauropod) was discovered in the Antarctic interior by William R. Hammer and his team in late 2003.


For the record, prior to 2010 nobody disputed that Antarctic ice was at least 40 million years old. McBullshit disputes that completely...


2. Speed of ice age glacier

Indeed, the data from Greenland above is the best data we have, since it is recent and conclusive. It took Greenland's ice age somewhere between 500k years and 2 million years from its beginning at the northern part of Greenland to get to where it is now.


That is WAY SLOWER than McBullshit suggests.


3. size of the glacier

Greenland's ice is not yet 2 miles thick anywhere. Below the Arctic Circle, Greenland's ice is under 1 mile thick.

Hence the claim of 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago being 75k years old is, well, NOT SUPPORTED BY DATA POINT GREENLAND at all.

Antarctica has 2.5 mile thick glacier. There is a dispute over the age of those too. McBullshit claims it is not that old and that while sitting on the South Pole Antarctica has frozen and thawed over and over like Dennis Quaid claimed in the movie "Day After Tomorrow"

4. ice cores

antarctic ice cores years - Google Search

The oldest continuous ice core records to date extend 123,000 years in Greenland and 800,000 years in Antarctica. Ice cores contain information about past temperature, and about many other aspects of the environment


And hence it is fair to say that the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Antarctica is WAY OLDER than 75k years... to put it mildly.

Even the Greenland ice is way older than that too, and it has yet to get to 2 miles thick



5. tectonic plate movement

Reiny recently claimed Greenland is part of North America. Not on my map. But it is on the SAME TECTONIC PLATE moving on the same vector because of the angle of the fault in the North Atlantic

north atlantic ocean floor map - Bing

Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.

www.bing.com

That fault has pushed Greenland NW and Europe SE for tens of millions of years, and hence explains why all of Europe's glaciers are melting while Greenland went into ice age. It was also pushing North America NW until NA got to its closest point to the pole, and then NA started moving SW on the SAME VECTOR on a SPHERE...

Accepting the 600 miles to the pole = your land entered an ice age

North America would have been in ice age for 30-50 million years, and would have been where Greenland is today 30-50 million years ago. The accepted date of that prior to 2010 was 50 million years...




Hence, the evidence that the glaciers on Chicago 2.5 miles thick were 75k years old is contrary to ALL DATA ON ICE AGES AND GLACIERS on the planet today.

The ice cores prove glaciers 2.5 miles thick TODAY are WAY OLDER than 75k years.

So is McBullshit wrong??


To me that is shockingly obvious. McBullshit is about fudging climate history after homO went silent

obama climate silence 2010 2012 - Google Search

tl/dr

 

[EMH]

tl/dr

I assume, like your inability to explain a map of the Arctic, that means

YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT

 

[ding]

I assume, like your inability to explain a map of the Arctic, that means

YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT

Maybe if you were better at articulating your points I would take you more serious.

 

[EMH]

tl/dr

I assume, like your inability to explain a map of the Arctic, that means

YOU CANNOT REFUTE ONE WORD OF THAT

Maybe if you were better at articulating your points I would take you more serious.

Translation - I am a parrot of lies and I hate it when you refute those lies, so I make shit up to avoid answering questions and debating data...