Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

No dufus, it’s not the warmest ocean water ever. It’s the fastest rate of increase while modern man has been on earth. You are a dufus. You don’t even know what climate change is about do you ? It’s about the rate of change, bubba.


LOL!!!

THAT was the claim, that this is the "warmest ever ocean water" and it produced... a DUD of a cane season, suggesting to anyone with an IQ over 5 that the water was NOT THAT WARM...
 
LOL!!!

THAT was the claim, that this is the "warmest ever ocean water" and it produced... a DUD of a cane season, suggesting to anyone with an IQ over 5 that the water was NOT THAT WARM...
Post it….obviously the climate was warmer when reptiles ruled the earth. Unless, you’re an evolution denier too. In that case, even the simplest climate change explanation won’t make sense. Well, are you an evolution deniers too ?
 
LOL!!!

THAT was the claim, that this is the "warmest ever ocean water" and it produced... a DUD of a cane season, suggesting to anyone with an IQ over 5 that the water was NOT THAT WARM...
You’re all over the place….modern man has been on earth 300,000 years.

Why the fk are you babbling about 20 million years ago ?
You're hilarious.
 
Post it….obviously the climate was warmer when reptiles ruled the earth. Unless, you’re an evolution denier too. In that case, even the simplest climate change explanation won’t make sense. Well, are you an evolution deniers too ?


You are SUCH a MORON. Jurassic was WARMER and WETTER, idiot...
 
You are SUCH a MORON. Jurassic was WARMER and WETTER, idiot...
What a dolt. Wtf cares ? Modern man was not here on earth. You’re hilariously ignorant about AGW….

AGW is about the greatest rate of change while man has been on earth. Anything before that was also too warm to support the evolution of modern man. Wtf are you doing ? Supporting AGW ?

At no time while modern man has been on earth, has the temps rose so rapidly. The faster it rises, the harder it is to support our species. Of course, if you’re an evolution denier, this shit is way over your head.
 
AAAAAAaaaaaaaah! DA JOOOOOOOSSSS!!!!!!!!!! :eek:


Still waiting for one single Jew who questions the Co2 FRAUD....


Start the Jeopardy! music



Hansen and Mann are in fact both Jews.... SHOCK!!! Not...

Had Einstein been still alive, the Co2 FRAUD wouldn't have gotten off the ground...
 
Still waiting for one single Jew who questions the Co2 FRAUD....


Start the Jeopardy! music



Hansen and Mann are in fact both Jews.... SHOCK!!! Not...

Had Einstein been still alive, the Co2 FRAUD wouldn't have gotten off the ground...
Have a long time waiting for any sane person who questions AGW….the only idiots that do are science illiterates.
What a bull shitter. As if you can relate to Einstein. Only a science illiterate would make that comment.
 
Translation - if a massive fraud against America is done by Jews, then it is OK and you are antisemitic for noticing it...
Where is the massive fraud by Jews foolish ? Name one. Just one. Now are you claiming that a Jew who believes in god is a fraud ? So all Christian’s are frauds too ?
 
Where is the massive fraud by Jews foolish ? Name one. Just one. Now are you claiming that a Jew who believes in god is a fraud ? So all Christian’s are frauds too ?


FRAUD = the claim that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes "warming"


There is NO EVIDENCE to support that claims since THIS is ALL THE EVIDENCE...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation - highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite RISINIG CO2...
 
FRAUD = the claim that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes "warming"


There is NO EVIDENCE to support that claims since THIS is ALL THE EVIDENCE...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation - highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite RISINIG CO2...
So, you think just because a Jew believes what every university and related science institute in the world believes , that makes him wrong ?
So you’re tell me you have to be stupid like you to not be a Jew. You’ve just made the point that all Jews are smarter than you ?
 
FRAUD = the claim that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes "warming"


There is NO EVIDENCE to support that claims since THIS is ALL THE EVIDENCE...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Translation - highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING in the ATMOSPHERE despite RISINIG CO2...
Hilarious….did you even read the title…from your own reference ?
It says that KEY CLAIM AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING EVAPORATES….are you that stupid ? Do you know what that even means ?
 
Hilarious….did you even read the title…from your own reference ?
It says that KEY CLAIM AGAINST GLOBAL WARMING EVAPORATES….are you that stupid ? Do you know what that even means ?



LOL!!!!

What that article documents is what happened.

The DATA showed NO WARMING.

And then it was FUDGED with LAUGHABLE BS...


The satellites were FUDGED from a flat line to an upward slope over "orbit wobble" which would not affect the IR readings at all

The balloons were FUDGED with the excuse that "shade issues" which were present the whole time should justify fudging the readings higher. Even if that were true, the "correction" would still be a one time correction to all data, and if you did that to a series that is a flat line, it would still be a FLAT LINE just a little higher. But somehow "correcting" for "shade issues" constant the whole time changed a flat line to an upward slope. If you think that is "science" you have an IQ under 5...
 
LOL!!!!

What that article documents is what happened.

The DATA showed NO WARMING.

And then it was FUDGED with LAUGHABLE BS...


The satellites were FUDGED from a flat line to an upward slope over "orbit wobble" which would not affect the IR readings at all

The balloons were FUDGED with the excuse that "shade issues" which were present the whole time should justify fudging the readings higher. Even if that were true, the "correction" would still be a one time correction to all data, and if you did that to a series that is a flat line, it would still be a FLAT LINE just a little higher. But somehow "correcting" for "shade issues" constant the whole time changed a flat line to an upward slope. If you think that is "science" you have an IQ under 5...
You’re a non reader aren’t you ? Their whole article discredits DENIERS. ITS THE DENIERS that fudged the data dufus.
 

Forum List

Back
Top