- May 20, 2009
- 23,425
- 8,069
- 890
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
About 20 logs a day.How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
About 20 logs a day.How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
Well, it depends on the wood, and how good the woodchuck's choppers chop.About 20 logs a day.How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
That's an awful lot of wood chucking. Are you sure?
There is a more precise formula though:
(W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1.
As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3 units of wood.
You have a point.There is a more precise formula though:
(W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1.
As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3 units of wood.
That's pretty amazing. One thing though... What's to say the wood chuck ever really chucked wood in the first place? Maybe this is just one of those silly urban legends?
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Does anybody know the answer to this question?
There is a more precise formula though:
(W + I) * C where W = the constant of wood, which is well known to be 61, as agreed in many scientific circles. I = the variable in this equation, and stands for the word "if" from the original problem. As there are three circumstances, with 0 equaling the chance that the woodchuck cannot chuck wood, 1 being the theory that the woodchuck can chuck wood but chooses not to, and 2 standing for the probability that the woodchuck can and will chuck wood, we clearly must choose 2 for use in this equation. C = the constant of Chuck Norris, whose presence in any problem involving the word chuck must there, is well known to equal 1.1 of any known being, therefore the final part of this calculation is 1.1.
As is clear, this appears to give the answer of (61 + 2) * 1.1 = (63) * 1.1 = 69.3 units of wood.
That's pretty amazing. One thing though... What's to say the wood chuck ever really chucked wood in the first place? Maybe this is just one of those silly urban legends?
why do yankees call them wood chucks?