CDZ How many net senate seats will the Ds lose in 2018?

[william the wie]

And congressional seats in the reapportionment election of 2022?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The GOP, provided it crafts a good replacement for ACA/AHCA that increases Medicaid subsidies and protects PP and lowers the cost to the working classes, will clean up.

 

[Pogo]

Bit early for predictions, not knowing who's running doncha think?

As a general rule whichever political party is not in the White House gains seats in mid-terms. Almost always in fact.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

 

[Pogo]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

Nope, not enough to go on. Any given election depends on who's running for it. And that's info we don't have yet. Ain't got nuttin' to do with bills.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

Nope, not enough to go on. Any given election depends on who's running for it. And that's info we don't have yet. Ain't got nuttin' to do with bills.

Sure, it does. You are hoping for a massacre, but that only happens if the GOP Senate screws up the health bill. The senators are well aware of it.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

That is a whole lot of 'ifs' for a party that has been somewhat dysfunctional thus far. The senate will be tough for the Dems though, considering how many seats they will have to defend.

 

[Pogo]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

Nope, not enough to go on. Any given election depends on who's running for it. And that's info we don't have yet. Ain't got nuttin' to do with bills.

Sure, it does. You are hoping for a massacre, but that only happens if the GOP Senate screws up the health bill. The senators are well aware of it.

I'm not "hoping for" anything --- I'm simply observing that any given election depends on who's running in it, and we do not know who the challengers are. Therefore it's impossible to make an educated guess on the OP's presented question.

Once those contestants are known, then we may be able to predict who wins this one an who wins that one. But you can't do that on generics.

 

[yiostheoy]

And congressional seats in the reapportionment election of 2022?

Or win ?!

What works for the goose works for the gander.

 

[yiostheoy]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

That is a whole lot of 'ifs' for a party that has been somewhat dysfunctional thus far. The senate will be tough for the Dems though, considering how many seats they will have to defend.

Trolls normally start with a troll title for their troll thread.

"How many seats are up for grabs in vulnerable districts" is a more logical non-troll phrasing of the question.

I have read that the DEM's have more vulnerable seats coming up.

But with Donnie and Paul behaving like mad frat boyz I have to believe that a vulnerable DEM seat is rather an oxymoron now.

Just as a safe GOP seat is also oxymoronic.

Nov 2018 is still 18 months away.

 

[DarkFury]

This last election gave birth to a new wing of the GOP. I fully expect the Trump wing to garner many more seats. As long as the Trump wing stays the party of the people I expect growth. The Democrats are now the coastal party and I expect that division to grow.

I also think that the Clinton Sanders subdivisions will also grow opening a shot for Warren as well. Clinton has already said she is open to 2020 and that will piss of the new Sanders wing of that party. The Sanders people will go Warren and if Clinton refuses to get out of the lime light she will hurt the party.

Should lepen win Monday it will show the entire world is moving right. Another really bad sign for Democrats.
Venezuela falling while no direct effect will also imprint on the minds of Americans the on going socialist failures. Should it become violent and I think it will that will also play a role causing Americans to put their needs ahead of that of the 3rd world.

Instant news allows us to see the failings of the liberal agenda live in real time. If I was a liberal I would fear that more then anything.

 

[frigidweirdo]

And congressional seats in the reapportionment election of 2022?

I'd say that they'll win seats, again.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

Nope, not enough to go on. Any given election depends on who's running for it. And that's info we don't have yet. Ain't got nuttin' to do with bills.

Sure, it does. You are hoping for a massacre, but that only happens if the GOP Senate screws up the health bill. The senators are well aware of it.

I'm not "hoping for" anything --- I'm simply observing that any given election depends on who's running in it, and we do not know who the challengers are. Therefore it's impossible to make an educated guess on the OP's presented question.

Once those contestants are known, then we may be able to predict who wins this one an who wins that one. But you can't do that on generics.

Perhaps for you, Pogo. We were talking about the Senate as a whole, not individual seats, meaning you have shifted the goal posts.

 

[2aguy]

And congressional seats in the reapportionment election of 2022?

Hopefully all of them....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

all this talk about "Russia interfered with the election" has completely angered Putin and uninformed sources tell me he wants to take all 25 Democrat Senate seats in the midterm

 

[rightwinger]

Republicans are only defending nine seats in 2018, with most of those seats in Red States. Given Republicans already have 52 seats, they should move to 55 to 57 seats

The wildcard for Dems will be Trump and healthcare
Trump impeachment, general incompetence or Republicans screwing over healthcare could cause the House and Senate to swing Democrat

 

[task0778]

No offense to anybody, but I wish we'd worry more about the problems we face now and how to deal with them than a freakin' election that is a year and a half away.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Red House is a bunch of yahoos.

The Red Senate can think and will save the GOP in 2018.

 

[Pogo]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

Nope, not enough to go on. Any given election depends on who's running for it. And that's info we don't have yet. Ain't got nuttin' to do with bills.

Sure, it does. You are hoping for a massacre, but that only happens if the GOP Senate screws up the health bill. The senators are well aware of it.

I'm not "hoping for" anything --- I'm simply observing that any given election depends on who's running in it, and we do not know who the challengers are. Therefore it's impossible to make an educated guess on the OP's presented question.

Once those contestants are known, then we may be able to predict who wins this one an who wins that one. But you can't do that on generics.

Perhaps for you, Pogo. We were talking about the Senate as a whole, not individual seats, meaning you have shifted the goal posts.

The OP brought up BOTH Senate and Congressional seats. And to both the points apply.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Pogo, normally that is so. But now that the GOP has inherited its role in national health care, if the Senate crafts the right bill, the House signs on, and the President signs it, the Dems could go to 38 seats.

Nope, not enough to go on. Any given election depends on who's running for it. And that's info we don't have yet. Ain't got nuttin' to do with bills.

Sure, it does. You are hoping for a massacre, but that only happens if the GOP Senate screws up the health bill. The senators are well aware of it.

I'm not "hoping for" anything --- I'm simply observing that any given election depends on who's running in it, and we do not know who the challengers are. Therefore it's impossible to make an educated guess on the OP's presented question.

Once those contestants are known, then we may be able to predict who wins this one an who wins that one. But you can't do that on generics.

Perhaps for you, Pogo. We were talking about the Senate as a whole, not individual seats, meaning you have shifted the goal posts.

The OP brought up BOTH Senate and Congressional seats. And to both the points apply.

You are acting out your Trump vid in this thread.

Yes, you changed the goal posts; yes, that was pointed out; and, yes, that will continue to happen as needed.