How Many Days Until Someone Sues Mandalay Bay?

[toobfreak]

You can call any time a gun made you feel better about your tiny dick a DGU.

Ah, so, let me get this straight------ you're arguing that guns are useless as a deterrent and if an attacker confronts you with you carrying a loaded handgun pointed right at his face, that you'd have better luck deterring him by waving your tiny dick at him?

 

[toobfreak]

You can call any time a gun made you feel better about your tiny dick a DGU.

Ah, so, let me get this straight------ you're arguing that guns are useless as a deterrent and if an attacker confronts you with you carrying a loaded handgun pointed right at his face, that you'd have better luck deterring him by waving your tiny dick at him?

So, I don't quite get what your POINT is Joe, that we should ALL give up carrying so that the only people out there with firearms are those wanting to rob us, assault us and kill us, that we should all just lay down and die?

That we are better off defenseless than to at least have a gun?

That in a case where a violent dangerous thug threatens us with a gun that we don't even use the gun right on our hip to protect ourselves?

That if an attacker is in the area threatening people near me and so is a likely danger to myself as well, that I wouldn't even use my own gun to protect myself or those around me, likely friends or family?

I'm not sure, aren't you the guy who recently told me you did 11 years in the service?

Just what is your point here Joe, that you are a liar, a draft dodger, got a chip on your soldier against the service, or that you just want all of us disarmed like you so that we are all standing around holding our dicks in our hands when danger strikes, like you? Seems to me what's at issue here is that you seem to be calling others who DO carry arms dickless cowards because you resent us and probably can't even get a carry permit yourself or would be too afraid to use it? Yeah, I think that's it.

 

[toobfreak]

Yeah, there's a reason for that. Because frankly, if everyone carried on the job, you'd have a lot of dead managers... that's why most workplaces are gun free. Don't be a moron.

Thanks for repeating the old Leftist lie for supporting the gun-control arguments, that if we all were carrying that the common man on the street is too stupid or irresponsible to protect ourselves? Meantime, people all around you ARE carrying and you will never even know it, that these people are among the MOST responsible people you will ever find and many of them are retired police or vets! That if a soldier can't be trusted to carry his piece around with him on base, how can he be trusted to carry it in combat? Or that just as I know you know, most EVERY mass shooting that occurs, occurs under conditions where the target audience is RESTRICTED from having a defensive firearm on them!

And that is why many schools now are reversing trend and are now at least having a few armed teachers or guards to actually deal with an attack other than to all run and hide under their desks!

Its about time we realize that the real pressure to disallow people from carrying in a particular area are pressure from insurance companies and lawyers. Businesses are under pressure for liability so they force us to leave our guns at home, then a serial killer comes along and murders a lot of innocent, defenseless people! I think it is about time we start holding businesses and ultimately insurance companies and their lawyers responsible for any injuries, violence or deaths that occur BECAUSE we were helpless to stop it, and that had we NOT been defenseless, the attacker would probably never have tried it in the first place!

After all, how many police barracks have you seen so far come under attack by a rogue marauder? None? Could it be because he knew everyone in there was armed and could shoot back?

 

[westwall]

Because the soldiers were ordered to go unarmed. But you already knew that, you just lie to back up your BS.

Uh, dude, most military bases they control when weapons are loaded and under what circumstances. This isn't a new thing.

But Ft. Hood had a substantial military police force. Hasan was still able to kill 13 people before they responded, because he had the element of surprise.

So, basically you are doubling down on stupid again, the bases were GUN FREE ZONES, thus they are a easy target. Thanks for pointing that out.

 

[JoeB131]

So, I don't quite get what your POINT is Joe, that we should ALL give up carrying so that the only people out there with firearms are those wanting to rob us, assault us and kill us, that we should all just lay down and die?

That we are better off defenseless than to at least have a gun?

Actually, you are probably off being defenseless, because most crooks will just want to take your money.

So let's be clear, very few people are killed during the course of robberies or other crimes. Most murders are either domestic violence, which guns make a lot more deadly, or criminals attacking other criminals. Which again, easy access to guns makes a lot worse.

OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE FIGURED THIS OUT!!!!

This is the only country where we let average citizens have guns, and then we wonder why we have so much violent crime!

 

[JoeB131]

So, basically you are doubling down on stupid again, the bases were GUN FREE ZONES, thus they are a easy target. Thanks for pointing that out.

You mean zones with hundreds of trained military policemen? Um, yeah.

 

[JoeB131]

Thanks for repeating the old Leftist lie for supporting the gun-control arguments, that if we all were carrying that the common man on the street is too stupid or irresponsible to protect ourselves? Meantime, people all around you ARE carrying and you will never even know it, that these people are among the MOST responsible people you will ever find and many of them are retired police or vets!

But we aren't talking about retired police or vets... we are talking about average citizens, that most of us don't want to have packing a gun at work during the argument about who ate the last donut.

 

[westwall]

So, basically you are doubling down on stupid again, the bases were GUN FREE ZONES, thus they are a easy target. Thanks for pointing that out.

You mean zones with hundreds of trained military policemen? Um, yeah.

Zones with very few MP's. Over thousands of acres of military base you will have fewer than 25 MP's at any one time.

 

[JoeB131]

Zones with very few MP's. Over thousands of acres of military base you will have fewer than 25 MP's at any one time.

since the MP's shot Hasan and took him into custody, that would seem to be adequate.

Here's the problem. The Army knew Hasan was a problem. They should have discharged him the minute he asked for a discharge based on his desire to not fight other Muslims. Instead they tried to deploy him to Afghanistan.

 

[RWNJ]

So, I don't quite get what your POINT is Joe, that we should ALL give up carrying so that the only people out there with firearms are those wanting to rob us, assault us and kill us, that we should all just lay down and die?

That we are better off defenseless than to at least have a gun?

Actually, you are probably off being defenseless, because most crooks will just want to take your money.

So let's be clear, very few people are killed during the course of robberies or other crimes. Most murders are either domestic violence, which guns make a lot more deadly, or criminals attacking other criminals. Which again, easy access to guns makes a lot worse.

OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE FIGURED THIS OUT!!!!

This is the only country where we let average citizens have guns, and then we wonder why we have so much violent crime!

You are a fool. Plain and simple. There are many places that have a high number of gun owners, yet have very low crime rates. Then there's Chicago, they have very strict gun laws and it is the murder capital of the United States. Explain that. These are facts that you cannot refute, so you ignore them, like a good little leftist bootlicking Prog. You, sir, and I use that term loosly, are a blithering idiot. Also, nationwide, gun sales are way up, yet crime is way down. Explain that. You can't. Your "guns are evil" narrative fails on every level. You lose.

And don't bother replying to me. I just placed you on my ignore list. I don't associate with people who are willfully ignorant and just plain dishonest.

 

[JoeB131]

Then there's Chicago, they have very strict gun laws and it is the murder capital of the United States. Explain that.

Okay, Chicago doesn't have strict gun laws. The gun ban was thrown out nearly a decade ago.

It also has a lower per-capita murder rate than Detroit, NOLA, Cleveland or St. Louis.

 

[JoeB131]

And don't bother replying to me. I just placed you on my ignore list. I don't associate with people who are willfully ignorant and just plain dishonest.

So you are going to be mocked wihtout rebuttal.... that works...

 

[Montrovant]

So, I don't quite get what your POINT is Joe, that we should ALL give up carrying so that the only people out there with firearms are those wanting to rob us, assault us and kill us, that we should all just lay down and die?

That we are better off defenseless than to at least have a gun?

Actually, you are probably off being defenseless, because most crooks will just want to take your money.

So let's be clear, very few people are killed during the course of robberies or other crimes. Most murders are either domestic violence, which guns make a lot more deadly, or criminals attacking other criminals. Which again, easy access to guns makes a lot worse.

OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE FIGURED THIS OUT!!!!

This is the only country where we let average citizens have guns, and then we wonder why we have so much violent crime!

You are a fool. Plain and simple. There are many places that have a high number of gun owners, yet have very low crime rates. Then there's Chicago, they have very strict gun laws and it is the murder capital of the United States. Explain that. These are facts that you cannot refute, so you ignore them, like a good little leftist bootlicking Prog. You, sir, and I use that term loosly, are a blithering idiot. Also, nationwide, gun sales are way up, yet crime is way down. Explain that. You can't. Your "guns are evil" narrative fails on every level. You lose.

And don't bother replying to me. I just placed you on my ignore list. I don't associate with people who are willfully ignorant and just plain dishonest.

Kind of odd to ask someone to "explain that" twice in a post, then end it by saying "don't bother replying to me."

 

[RWNJ]

So, I don't quite get what your POINT is Joe, that we should ALL give up carrying so that the only people out there with firearms are those wanting to rob us, assault us and kill us, that we should all just lay down and die?

That we are better off defenseless than to at least have a gun?

Actually, you are probably off being defenseless, because most crooks will just want to take your money.

So let's be clear, very few people are killed during the course of robberies or other crimes. Most murders are either domestic violence, which guns make a lot more deadly, or criminals attacking other criminals. Which again, easy access to guns makes a lot worse.

OTHER COUNTRIES HAVE FIGURED THIS OUT!!!!

This is the only country where we let average citizens have guns, and then we wonder why we have so much violent crime!

You are a fool. Plain and simple. There are many places that have a high number of gun owners, yet have very low crime rates. Then there's Chicago, they have very strict gun laws and it is the murder capital of the United States. Explain that. These are facts that you cannot refute, so you ignore them, like a good little leftist bootlicking Prog. You, sir, and I use that term loosly, are a blithering idiot. Also, nationwide, gun sales are way up, yet crime is way down. Explain that. You can't. Your "guns are evil" narrative fails on every level. You lose.

And don't bother replying to me. I just placed you on my ignore list. I don't associate with people who are willfully ignorant and just plain dishonest.

Kind of odd to ask someone to "explain that" twice in a post, then end it by saying "don't bother replying to me."

Not at all. I know his type. I know what they'll say before they say it. I did ask, but I did it for the benefit of others. I really don't care what he thinks. He's a brainless lib prog.

 

[KissMy]

You can call any time a gun made you feel better about your tiny dick a DGU.

Ah, so, let me get this straight------ you're arguing that guns are useless as a deterrent and if an attacker confronts you with you carrying a loaded handgun pointed right at his face, that you'd have better luck deterring him by waving your tiny dick at him?

You are a retarded fucktard who has never been at gunpoint

 

[toobfreak]

You are a retarded fucktard who has never been at gunpoint

Wise words from another imbecile who thinks he can know how others live, what they think and what they've done, ALL AT A DISTANCE OVER THE INTERNET!!!

 

[KissMy]

You are a retarded fucktard who has never been at gunpoint

Wise words from another imbecile who thinks he can know how others live, what they think and what they've done, ALL AT A DISTANCE OVER THE INTERNET!!!

It's absolutely clear you have zero knowledge of the subject so please stop embarrassing yourself & wasting everyone else's time.

 

[toobfreak]

You are a retarded fucktard who has never been at gunpoint

Wise words from another imbecile who thinks he can know how others live, what they think and what they've done, ALL AT A DISTANCE OVER THE INTERNET!!!

It's absolutely clear you have zero knowledge of the subject so please stop embarrassing yourself & wasting everyone else's time.

Really? I KNOW what I know! The question is what do YOU know? To date, you haven't proven you know anything on the subject. Just pure talk.
AS soon as you showed up to use unimaginative language like 'Fucktard,' and told me what I have never done, as if you know shit, you've immediate cast yourself as just one more know-nothing, do-nothing, pure bullshit empty-headed liberal whose every argument to every point is just to call other people names because you really have nothing real of any value to say!

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

better yet lets start inspecting every worthless Democrat voter, because since they hate human beings, it is them who is most likely to shoot up young boys and girls at a Country Western Event as what happened in Las Vegas. Start profiling the shitfucks, and soon, there wont be any more killings as those who would be most violent could then be put in institution of the mentally challenged where any fucking socialist belongs. Right Joe?

Give most mass shooting are done by right wing gun nuts, no, not really.

Really ? Okay Joe I will play along, please show us all the mass shootings done by right win gun nuts. There must be plenty of links proving your points, or are there?

How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job

#10) Sociopaths are delusional and literally believe that what they say becomes truth merely because they say it!

Now we wont see Joe for over a Month or more, because it will take him that long or longer to find any proof as it isn't right wingers doing the crime, but his own side. See you later Joe, dumbass.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I believe that is already in the works. Now in the future will come with every concert ticket a disclaimer that in buying the ticket you hold harmless the producers of the event of all responsibility for snipers, car bombs, gunmen and mass murderers.

And this isn't crazy to you?

I remember after the Aurora shooting, they played a five minute thing about "What to do if a Crazy Person starts shooting the theater". It was pure cover your ass kind of stuff on the theater chain's part.

Did you know Joe that the Aurora theater was a "GUN FREE ZONE" that was a lot farther than other movie theaters that were not "GUN FREE ZONES". Why would someone who voted Democrat go much farther away to harm people when he could of gone local but might meet resistance?