How do you mess with conservatives when they threaten to murder you over the internet?

I came here with an honest desire to discuss. I quickly learned that discussion is impossible with fanatics. It's kind of like trying to debate economic policy with a monkey. The more valid points you make, the angrier it gets and the more of its own shit it flings at you. You realize the Sisyphian nature of your task so you start poking it with a stick. Eventually it's going to do something equivalent to saying something along the lines of "When should I expect you to come and attempt to take my guns? Time and date." What are some of your favorite, most fun ways to defuse the situation before it shows up to your house with a sawed off?

I only ask for my own amusement and personal safety.
Quite frankly, I barely pay attention to you. I read about two or three sentences of your topic about how liberals couldn't be biased and completely dismissed you as one of the dumbest posters to roll around here in a long time. Coming from me, that's really saying something. Ask around.

Oh, the OP is the one who claims liberal cannot be biased? lmao

That explains a lot.

Yep, that should have given everyone a clue about the DINGBAT spammer/troll
 
If you threaten to take away their property, and they promise to defend their property with violence, it is not a threat. Unless, of course, you intend to try to personally take their property away.
 
I came here with an honest desire to discuss. I quickly learned that discussion is impossible with fanatics. It's kind of like trying to debate economic policy with a monkey. The more valid points you make, the angrier it gets and the more of its own shit it flings at you. You realize the Sisyphian nature of your task so you start poking it with a stick. Eventually it's going to do something equivalent to saying something along the lines of "When should I expect you to come and attempt to take my guns? Time and date." What are some of your favorite, most fun ways to defuse the situation before it shows up to your house with a sawed off?

I only ask for my own amusement and personal safety.
Be specific link to these threats.
links? The guy's been here all of two weeks he's a lying troll POS.
 
I don't know. No one has ever threatened me online. Course I try to be nice to people
 
I am not defending violence. I am well aware of what took place and in no way was this guy personally threatened.

As for my response to you....you know...the "grow up" line......it was warranted. You should have responded like an adult and say "I was not aware of the fact that this thread was started due to a situation in another thread. My "strawman" comment was not warranted"...

Instead, you responded like an child and took your opponent in a circle....you know....took weak to admit when you erred.

So I simply told you to grow up, child.

So....grow up child.
Guy demands I give him a time and date to show up and shoot me and that's not threatening me. Of course a marine would think that. Trained and broken murderers. Normal people don't celebrate or defend violence or threats of violence against police and random strangers on the internet.

I agree normal people don't celebrate threats of violence against police or citizens. That's why the defense of trayvon Martin, that cop killer in New York, the rioters in Ferguson, and the occupy movement is seriously messed up.

It's also why overextended government is an evil.
 
The discussion that inspired the OP is in another thread. My post is relevant to that discussion. Please try to keep up.

Then it's out of context, innit? If it's not here I have no idea what you're talking about because there ain't nothing here to "keep up" with.

Ergo: strawman.
grow up.


Oooh. Devastatingly intellectual response. My head swims.

It's illustrative who shows up to tacitly defend violence threats here. Kind of like starting a thread called "racists are bad" and then watching all the racists show up. :popcorn:
I am not defending violence. I am well aware of what took place and in no way was this guy personally threatened.

As for my response to you....you know...the "grow up" line......it was warranted. You should have responded like an adult and say "I was not aware of the fact that this thread was started due to a situation in another thread. My "strawman" comment was not warranted"...

Instead, you responded like an child and took your opponent in a circle....you know....took weak to admit when you erred.

So I simply told you to grow up, child.

So....grow up child.

Uh, no Junior, doesn't work like that. Whatever Ernie's talking about (or making up) does not exist here. So again, the only question we have here is hypothetical. So again, ergo strawman.

Don't like how logic works? Tough titty. Change your diaper.
 
The discussion that inspired the OP is in another thread. My post is relevant to that discussion. Please try to keep up.

Then it's out of context, innit? If it's not here I have no idea what you're talking about because there ain't nothing here to "keep up" with.

Ergo: strawman.
grow up.


Oooh. Devastatingly intellectual response. My head swims.

It's illustrative who shows up to tacitly defend violence threats here. Kind of like starting a thread called "racists are bad" and then watching all the racists show up. :popcorn:
I am not defending violence. I am well aware of what took place and in no way was this guy personally threatened.

As for my response to you....you know...the "grow up" line......it was warranted. You should have responded like an adult and say "I was not aware of the fact that this thread was started due to a situation in another thread. My "strawman" comment was not warranted"...

Instead, you responded like an child and took your opponent in a circle....you know....took weak to admit when you erred.

So I simply told you to grow up, child.

So....grow up child.

Uh, no Junior, doesn't work like that. Whatever Ernie's talking about (or making up) does not exist here. So again, the only question we have here is hypothetical. So again, ergo strawman.

Don't like how logic works? Tough titty. Change your diaper.
Still waiting for the op to post links to the supposed threats.
 
Then it's out of context, innit? If it's not here I have no idea what you're talking about because there ain't nothing here to "keep up" with.

Ergo: strawman.
grow up.


Oooh. Devastatingly intellectual response. My head swims.

It's illustrative who shows up to tacitly defend violence threats here. Kind of like starting a thread called "racists are bad" and then watching all the racists show up. :popcorn:
I am not defending violence. I am well aware of what took place and in no way was this guy personally threatened.

As for my response to you....you know...the "grow up" line......it was warranted. You should have responded like an adult and say "I was not aware of the fact that this thread was started due to a situation in another thread. My "strawman" comment was not warranted"...

Instead, you responded like an child and took your opponent in a circle....you know....took weak to admit when you erred.

So I simply told you to grow up, child.

So....grow up child.

Uh, no Junior, doesn't work like that. Whatever Ernie's talking about (or making up) does not exist here. So again, the only question we have here is hypothetical. So again, ergo strawman.

Don't like how logic works? Tough titty. Change your diaper.
Still waiting for the op to post links to the supposed threats.

The OP asked for tips on how to handle a hypothetical. Didn't say it was an actual event.
 


Oooh. Devastatingly intellectual response. My head swims.

It's illustrative who shows up to tacitly defend violence threats here. Kind of like starting a thread called "racists are bad" and then watching all the racists show up. :popcorn:
I am not defending violence. I am well aware of what took place and in no way was this guy personally threatened.

As for my response to you....you know...the "grow up" line......it was warranted. You should have responded like an adult and say "I was not aware of the fact that this thread was started due to a situation in another thread. My "strawman" comment was not warranted"...

Instead, you responded like an child and took your opponent in a circle....you know....took weak to admit when you erred.

So I simply told you to grow up, child.

So....grow up child.

Uh, no Junior, doesn't work like that. Whatever Ernie's talking about (or making up) does not exist here. So again, the only question we have here is hypothetical. So again, ergo strawman.

Don't like how logic works? Tough titty. Change your diaper.
Still waiting for the op to post links to the supposed threats.

The OP asked for tips on how to handle a hypothetical. Didn't say it was an actual event.
Ohh so he lied about us as usual. Remind us of all those riots the Tea party took part in again? The death threats and other assorted supposed violent actions of right wingers?
 
Who has threatened you? Where? Link to it.
You really shouldn't equate a vow to protect one's personal property with a death threat.
Coming to my house to take my property will result in grievous bodily harm. That is not a threat. It's a promise and well within my rights that you would prefer I not have.

Strawman.
Why don't you get familiar with the impetus behind the OP before making a fool of yourself, Possum boy?

That's where I started. How do you think I came up with "strawman"?

From the wizard of oz...


"I could while away the hours, conferrin' with the flowers
Consultin' with the rain.
And my head I'd be scratchin' while my thoughts were busy hatchin'
If I only had a brain."

Now don't chew go piling on Ernie. I've already disciplined him. :nono:
If you don't know the reason behind a thread, that's on you. An argument that you have no reason to comment on is not a straw man just because you're ignorant. It's not my job to keep you up to date.

Discipline me? Really! As I said earlier: Please try to keep up.
 
Oooh. Devastatingly intellectual response. My head swims.

It's illustrative who shows up to tacitly defend violence threats here. Kind of like starting a thread called "racists are bad" and then watching all the racists show up. :popcorn:
I am not defending violence. I am well aware of what took place and in no way was this guy personally threatened.

As for my response to you....you know...the "grow up" line......it was warranted. You should have responded like an adult and say "I was not aware of the fact that this thread was started due to a situation in another thread. My "strawman" comment was not warranted"...

Instead, you responded like an child and took your opponent in a circle....you know....took weak to admit when you erred.

So I simply told you to grow up, child.

So....grow up child.

Uh, no Junior, doesn't work like that. Whatever Ernie's talking about (or making up) does not exist here. So again, the only question we have here is hypothetical. So again, ergo strawman.

Don't like how logic works? Tough titty. Change your diaper.
Still waiting for the op to post links to the supposed threats.

The OP asked for tips on how to handle a hypothetical. Didn't say it was an actual event.
Ohh so he lied about us as usual. Remind us of all those riots the Tea party took part in again? The death threats and other assorted supposed violent actions of right wingers?

Dood, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. :dunno:
 
Strawman.
Why don't you get familiar with the impetus behind the OP before making a fool of yourself, Possum boy?

That's where I started. How do you think I came up with "strawman"?

From the wizard of oz...


"I could while away the hours, conferrin' with the flowers
Consultin' with the rain.
And my head I'd be scratchin' while my thoughts were busy hatchin'
If I only had a brain."

Now don't chew go piling on Ernie. I've already disciplined him. :nono:
If you don't know the reason behind a thread, that's on you. An argument that you have no reason to comment on is not a straw man just because you're ignorant. It's not my job to keep you up to date.

Discipline me? Really! As I said earlier: Please try to keep up.

"Keep up"?

I started, strangely enough, at post 1. Is there a post before post 1?

Okay then.
 

Forum List

Back
Top