LOki
The Yaweh of Mischief
- Mar 26, 2006
- 4,084
- 359
- 85
Not if that "background check" involves submitting your identity.There is a differance between registration of ownership....and a background check.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not if that "background check" involves submitting your identity.There is a differance between registration of ownership....and a background check.
Thus, no tangible difference between "background checks" and gun owner registration.I agree.
They could, but why would they? Criminals do not submit themselves to background checks or registration; so it's patently clear that the government asking for background information, is not really looking for information regarding illegally bought/sold/aquired/possessed weapons.Cant they run the check.....the new owner is good to go....and then the Information is deleted???
Maybe you should think about that before you form opinions and call names.....
On my last birthday.....I walked outside to find a man stabbed on the street...multiple times.....a few months ago....a 16 yr old was killed at the park where my kids play at.....a year ago....my friends were at a party and some uninvited guests showed up...fight insued...my buddie watched a young man bleed dark blood quickly as he died. Not long ago in SF close to where I live .....a man hosed a car with an AK killing a father and his two sons. And two days ago.....a few gangbangers decided to have a fued in my front yard involving a machette with my kids right there. These are a few....just a few.
So maybe you can curb your "Opinion Queer" comments.....
Does "gun queer" also equally apply to those obviously obsessed by guns, but wishing them to be strictly controlled through force of legislation, by "butch" authoritarians?If you obsess about guns, as we so often see people doing here?
You're gun queer.
If the "obsession" of guns is the measure of being "gun queer", then is seems patently clear that those who obsessively advocate for banning guns from the posession of normal folks, are also "gun queers."the difference is how obsessed you are by guns, not the mere ownership of one.
Seriously.Queer means ODD, you know.
Let me suggest that you INSIST on using the word because it is now also used to mean homosexuals, and you REFUSE to apply it to "gun queers" that oppose the rights of gun owners because you're queer for their position.I REFUSE to give up the word's meaning just becuase it is now also used to mean homosexuals.
I've known people who have never owned a gun, never shot a gun, never held a gun, have no idea how a gun operates, or what a gun's purpose is, yet they insist that all guns are inherently evil under all circumstances where regular folks possess them, and that all guns should be banned from private possession--even if that ban has to be enforced at gunpoint; in fact they INSIST it be enforced at gunpoint.I've owned guns in the past, that didn't make me a gun queer.
But others I have know owned collections of guns, guns that they loved more than their wifes.
they're gun queers.
I think I do, but I'm not about to be so disingenuous in it's use as you.Do you understand the differnce in terminology, now?
Does "gun queer" also equally apply to those obviously obsessed by guns, but wishing them to be strictly controlled through force of legislation, by "butch" authoritarians?
If the "obsession" of guns is the measure of being "gun queer", then is seems patently clear that those who obsessively advocate for banning guns from the posession of normal folks, are also "gun queers."
Seriously.
Let me suggest that you INSIST on using the word because it is now also used to mean homosexuals, and you REFUSE to apply it to "gun queers" that oppose the rights of gun owners because you're queer for their position.
I've known people who have never owned a gun, never shot a gun, never held a gun, have no idea how a gun operates, or what a gun's purpose is, yet they insist that all guns are inherently evil under all circumstances where regular folks possess them, and that all guns should be banned from private possession--even if that ban has to be enforced at gunpoint; in fact they INSIST it be enforced at gunpoint.
It seems they're just as (if not more so) "gun queer." Yes?
I think I do, but I'm not about to be so disingenuous in it's use as you.
ANTI-gun queer would be more accurate, of course, But yes, there are probably as many of those nitwits as there are gun obsessed notwits, too.
Good point!
Works for me
Yup!
It is the word which inflames the basic fears of many gun obsessed men, to be sure.
Yes, I know many of those assholes, too.
Yes.
Well, given that I don't give a rat's ass about people owning guns, that's not only not being disengenuous, it also makes you spot on accurate.
You see what's going on here, don't you?
The game is to assume that anyone who is not a gun queer must therefore be entirely oppossed to the second amendment.
And more, to try to pin that label on anyone who in other areas some of these very stupid people assume must be a kneejerking caracature of what a liberal is, too.
Hey, I don't blame them, too much.
After all they don't have the intellectual horsepower to have a real debate with a real person about what that person actually writes on most subjects.
So they attempt to put words into other people's mouths so they can take the time out of the busy days to insult their intellectual superiors.
You have a gun for some legal purpose? No problem at my end.
You use that gun for a crime? I'd have you fucking shot after a fair trail.
You lose that gun, and it gets used in crime? I'd make you an accessaory to the crime, too.
You want personal responsibility, fans?
I'll give it back to you in spades.
So using your logic if someone steals my car and uses it in a crime or kills people with it I should be held accountable? How about knives? Screwdrivers? Hack saws? Axes? Etc Etc.
You are a fucking joke.
Since the foundational issue you're discussing is responsibility, unless you can demonstrate that the responsibilty appurtentant to gun ownership is substantially different than the responsibility appurtentant to the ownership of other items used to inflict harm on others, RGS did not use faulty analogy.You are wholly unqualified to adress any issue involving logic, Champ.
In this particular case your objection is based on the FALSE ANALOGY method of debating an issue.
If I'd been talking about cars, I would have mentioned it.
The topic at hand is gun owership responsibility.
I expressed an opinion about how much responsibility I think we ought to hold gun owners to.
In my opinion, we ought to hold them to a LOT of responsibility for what happens to their weapons.
Tell me, what would the outcome for a troop have been if he'd lost his piece in the service?
Would YOU have said: "Oh, that's okay, mistakes happen"?
I kinda seriously doubt it.
You are wholly unqualified to adress any issue involving logic, Champ.
In this particular case your objection is based on the FALSE ANALOGY method of debating an issue.
If I'd been talking about cars, I would have mentioned it.
The topic at hand is gun owership responsibility.
I expressed an opinion about how much responsibility I think we ought to hold gun owners to.
In my opinion, we ought to hold them to a LOT of responsibility for what happens to their weapons.
Tell me, what would the outcome for a troop have been if he'd lost his piece in the service?
Would YOU have said: "Oh, that's okay, mistakes happen"?
I kinda seriously doubt it.
If you live someplace where you need a gun for home secutity, fine.
If you obsess about guns, as we so often see people doing here?
You're gun queer.
the difference is how obsessed you are by guns, not the mere ownership of one.
Queer means ODD, you know.
I REFUSE to give up the word's meaning just becuase it is now also used to mean homosexuals.
I've owned guns in the past, that didn't make me a gun queer.
But others I have know owned collections of guns, guns that they loved more than their wifes.
they're gun queers.
Do you understand the differnce in terminology, now?