Yeah but we need to stop automatically assuming that what the kids get at the hands of the nationalized, statist pits that are our schools, can be considered "an education" in anything like the traditional consideration. I think children are better served to spend the time they waste in middle and high school at HOME, regardless of whether or not they are getting anything like a rubber-stamped statist *education*.I think homeschooling can be the best option. But it depends on the family. If they can afford a parent out of the workforce. If the parent has the abilities to teach their child a college prep level education (or the ability to get them to someone who can).
I don't think a less educated workforce in today's world though is a better thing, and the last time the US had a large number of homeschooling was in the South where we had quite a bit of poverty.
Like or dislike public education, the countries that do not offer it, or shorten it I don't think set a good example of success without it. I don't think we should be looking up to Sub Saharan Africa, Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan and the like for education reform ideas.
As for online only, I get the ease of it, but the ability to build social skills needed in life, would be lost. Sure, maybe sitting in front of your computer alone all day is the future world we want and will have, but I'd like to only use that option where the student fits the situation (has a social life outside school, sports, clubs, etc., self motivated, higher knowledge base). And I don't think it gives students who may need attention what they need. There's plenty of studies that online education in STEM courses does not achieve the same results as those in a physical classroom and increases the chance of dropping out.
I guess everyone is entitled their opinion. But there's a lot of people with children who believe some interesting things not based in facts and data.
Do you think more Americans growing up with their only education on law being from a parent who believes that Sharia law is the only way to go, improves the USA, or would a teacher that could also help influence that child's education on constitutional law be an improvement?
Do you think a homeschooled child whose parent believes in the flat Earth theory should be given full reign to teach their child science with no external science studies?
Or should a parent who is a neo Nazi Holocaust denier be the only educational source for a child learning history and civics?
Or a person who believes that new age remedies are the only solution to sickness. Does that cost America a great surgeon?
Like I said. Based on countries without state sponsored education and the changes that have followed countries stepping away from that, it seems like a very poor choice.