gallantwarrior
Gold Member
No. I do think his subjects were sane enough to recognize how useless his experiments were.I'm already on record admitting that human nature allows us to love anyone we want to. But I am also on record that biologically, there are TWO genders and there is one function for gender. I am also on record as being against the forced acceptance of another person's preference for whom they choose to love. (Human sexuality often mirrors psychological "love".) Personally, who, or what, another person cares about is pretty irrelevant in my world view. How I, or others, are forced to fit another's preferences is pretty repugnant.There is a physical aspect and a mental aspect of sexualityHell is of our own engineering, apparently.
Two genders, male and female. Anything else is a human construct and completely invalid when seen for the purpose that the two are intended. Going down the road of transgender, etc, insanity, the species will fail.
They don’t always match
In view of that what do you think of the outlandish, repulsive and perverted idea that a transgender male would have a uterus implanted so that he or she could become pregnant and then have an abortion? I mean where the hell would he get the uterus from in the first place?
Is Julian Castro on LSD?
Besides being mentally vacant is this not the epitome of disrespect to everything we see as human life?
Jo
I don't know that uterine transplants are possible as yet. I can't swear that anyone is even researching it.
One assumes you'd get the donor uterus from the same place you get other donor organs for transplant: dead people.
Was Mengele any worse?