How a Post–Civil War Supreme Court Decision Dismantles Sanctuary Cities

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
15,768
27,774
2,430
How a Post–Civil War Supreme Court Decision Dismantles Sanctuary Cities



https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...ry_cities.html
Jun 07, 2019 ~ By Brian S. Messenger
How a Post–Civil War Supreme Court Decision Dismantles Sanctuary.... actually provides a strong precedent for using the Privileges and Immunities clause of the 14th Amendment against all sanctuary states, counties, and cities.... Regardless of your position on that debate, this article looks at how the decision by Justice Miller in 1873 actually provides a strong precedent for using the Privileges and Immunities clause of the 14th Amendment against all sanctuary states, counties, and cities.
It may seem counter-intuitive, but letting a few people come into our country wrongly may be impeding our ability to help many more in their home countries. The problem is that the United States incurs significant costs to have them here (medical, schools, benefits, wear and tear on facilities, housing, traffic, environmental, etc.) The United States is arguably the most charitable country in the world. If our citizens weren’t burdened with the high costs of illegal immigration, they would have much more energy and money to help those in other countries. In this way, many more people could live happier lives in their home countries rather than under the approach being taken today.


~~~~~~
The basic point is that American citizens continue, of course, to have privileges and immunities that are enforceable by the federal courts, within federal jurisdiction, and subject to federal deference to relevant State law and its discretion within its jurisdiction.
As for enforcement of immigration law, abdication by the (Obama) executive order was a stupid and a total breach of duty.
It was so asinine and a total breach of his oath of office that one might ask if it was pursuant to "foreign" interests rather than that of America. A Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA agenda is a "foreign," not an American ideology and interest.
Since the aftermath of WWII, we as a country have been pouring billions in foreign aid down the toilet in futile attempts to convert countries all around the world from hell holes into livable entities. The only way I can see to actually transform any of these hell hole countries into anything resembling modern societies would be to annex them and replace their government with US bureaucracies or military occupational forces. Of course, this will never happen, so what should we do? Leave them to their own devices and tighten our immigration laws and enforcement efforts to prevent our country from becoming a sh*thole.
Brian Messenger's excellent summary, "letting a few people come into our country illegally may be impeding our ability to help many more in their home countries...." This video from NUMERSUSA.ORG visually shows evidence of this truth (See video below).
 

Forum List

Back
Top