House subpoenas for Trump documents due today.

The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.
Rosenstein and Mueller ignored deadlines for documents....why do I feel if any of these people tried the same thing Democrats will / would immediately attempt to prosecute?! :p

Rosenstein and Mueller ignored subpoenas for documents relating to a current investigation, which Nunes and his Committee KNEW they couldn't hand over. Nunes request was strictly for partisan purposes and to make the Justice Department appear uncooperative when they were being nothing of the kind.

These documents relate to the criminal activities as they relate to issues already before the Committee, and which came out in Michael Cohen's testimony. This is REAL oversight. Not the fake oversight that Devon Nunes pretended was looking into Russian interference, but was actually running cover for the Trump White House.

You've been watching 8 years of Republicans chase their tails while a clean running White House was in charge. If not for their manufactured and phony FOX News scandals, Republicans didn't have a whole hell of a lot to look into. When Democrats were in charge of the House previously, the Iran-Contra scandal was raging.

This is the problem: Republicans have gotten themselves into real messes in the White House going back to Nixon and Watergate. While Reagan wasn't directly implicated in Iran Contra, he took responsibility for it because if he didn't know, he should have. This President, who is the hand behind all of the scandals uncovered so far, denies all responsibility for anything. If it goes wrong, it's someone else's fault.

What a total putz!
We found out Rosenstein was Over Exagerrating (Lieing) about the documents Congress wanted and their relevance to National Security. There was Zippo, Nada, Nothing in the documents about National Security. It was just embarrassing to The DOJ.

Furthermore, Rosenstein and Mueller allowed people like Strozk and Page to wipe their phones before handing them to the IG.

Sound familiar?

It should.


Clinton was allowed to wipe her server with Bleach Bit of over 33,000 government documents.

We know they were all government documents and that she lied, because they were found on Weiner's laptop, and then re-classified, because they were classified, as "In the Interest of National Security. Comey allowed this, despite TWO FEDERAL COURT ORDERS PROHIBITING THE DELETION OF EVEN A SINGLE EMAIL!

Even after she Illegally Bleach Bitted 33,000 Documents to Avoid Prosecution, FBI Analysts still found Classified Documents on her server, forcing Comey to come up with a way to exonerate her, AS HE WAS ORDERED TO DO BY LORETTA LYNCH, i.e. "OBAMA". Strozk went and changed the language on The FBI Report so that it did NOT MATCH THE LANGUAGE of ESPIONAGE LAWS which would have required AUTOMATIC INDICTMENT OF CLINTON.

She also lied to The FBI and Congress when she testified that she had only ever used one electronic device to conduct government business on, when in fact she purchased 17 burner devices off of The Internet, which she smashed with a hammer. The remaining devices were turned over to authorities with their sim cards missing and destroyed.

Furthermore, COMEY completely overreached his authority, and spoke for The DOJ, and Loretta Lynch and invented a new Never Used Standard of "Lack of Intent and Overall Stupidity" as an excuse to exonerate Clinton. Her Exoneration Letter though was written Two Months before anyone was interviewed. He also broke all procedural protocols, and policies, by granting her entire staff immunity, then interviewed all of them and did not record, or take notes on a single thing they said.

After he was fired for dereliction of duty, negligence, and violating his oath of office, and policies and procedures required The FBI follow during Investigations, he then leaked Classified and Privileged information to an unauthorized person. There is proof he was also leaking classified information all along the 2016 election. He then lied to Congress several times, and committed blatant perjury. Why has no one charged him? Why had none of the people who illegally unmasked American Citizens who are supposed to be protected by The FISA Regulations, been given even a slap on the wrist?

The DOJ and FBI also lied about text messages Strozk and Page had showing their plotting, and their bias against President Trump. They told Congress that 50,000 messages from all of their staff (not just Page and Strozk) were "IRRETRIEVABLY LOST" It took THE IG 24 hours to get them from the Cell Phone Service Provider.

Why do you LIE, like these people lie? Don't you know you condemn your soul every time you lie? Or is your soul already condemned so that you cannot tell the difference between The Truth and a Lie.

Half of Mueller's team had to be fired and are under criminal investigation for things like this. Mueller populated his entire team with disreputable people, and every single one of them were partisan, and were donors to Hillary Clinton's campaign. One of the people no one talks about is Preet Bahara, who was fired by President Trump for corruption, dereliction of duty and prosecutorial misconduct. Mueller went right out and hired that guy. He should have been recused based on that alone. Mueller should have been recused for being Comey's friend and for being rejected as Head of The FBI by President Trump.

But you see none of this, even though this evidence and much much more had already been presented to you in this forum repeatedly. You completely ignore all evidence that runs counter to your propaganda operation. You even refuse to discuss the DOCUMENTED money trail from Clinton (Given Immunity) The Podesta Group (Given Immunity) To COIE PERKINS LAWFIRM (Given Immunity) To Fusion GPS (Given Immunity) To Fusion GPS Operatives Skripal, Steele, and Natalia Veselnitskya and on to Russian Intelligence Agents for the creation and dissemination of The Dossier.

You even ignore the fact it was never corroborated, and that still 3 years later they cannot verify anything in it, with Christopher Steele saying it can't be verified. You Ignore the fact that is was illegally used in FISA 4 times, and 4 times they filed False Affidavits in FISA (Which is a FELONY)

Are The FISA Judges in this secret and unconstitutional court CROOKED? Why haven't then said or did anything about The FRAUD that took place in FISA?

You cannot be an American Citizen. If you are, you are a sad one, because that means you have lost your soul, and have no love for this countries and principles it was founded on.

What a sad sorry state of a person you are, if that is the case. Never mind that you lost an election. If you have lost your soul, you are a condemned woman, and death row inmate as far as eternity goes. Very sad indeed.

The Stench at Obama's DOJ and FBI | RealClearPolitics
 
Last edited:
This is the only thing appropriate in answer to this-

upload_2019-3-19_8-49-19.gif


The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.was...c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

Nowhere to run. Even the Republicans are deserting his sorry ass.
Rosenstein and Mueller ignored deadlines for documents....why do I feel if any of these people tried the same thing Democrats will / would immediately attempt to prosecute?! :p

Rosenstein and Mueller ignored subpoenas for documents relating to a current investigation, which Nunes and his Committee KNEW they couldn't hand over. Nunes request was strictly for partisan purposes and to make the Justice Department appear uncooperative when they were being nothing of the kind.

These documents relate to the criminal activities as they relate to issues already before the Committee, and which came out in Michael Cohen's testimony. This is REAL oversight. Not the fake oversight that Devon Nunes pretended was looking into Russian interference, but was actually running cover for the Trump White House.

You've been watching 8 years of Republicans chase their tails while a clean running White House was in charge. If not for their manufactured and phony FOX News scandals, Republicans didn't have a whole hell of a lot to look into. When Democrats were in charge of the House previously, the Iran-Contra scandal was raging.

This is the problem: Republicans have gotten themselves into real messes in the White House going back to Nixon and Watergate. While Reagan wasn't directly implicated in Iran Contra, he took responsibility for it because if he didn't know, he should have. This President, who is the hand behind all of the scandals uncovered so far, denies all responsibility for anything. If it goes wrong, it's someone else's fault.

What a total putz!
 
The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.was...c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

Nowhere to run. Even the Republicans are deserting his sorry ass.
Rosenstein and Mueller ignored deadlines for documents....why do I feel if any of these people tried the same thing Democrats will / would immediately attempt to prosecute?! :p

Rosenstein and Mueller ignored subpoenas for documents relating to a current investigation, which Nunes and his Committee KNEW they couldn't hand over. Nunes request was strictly for partisan purposes and to make the Justice Department appear uncooperative when they were being nothing of the kind.

These documents relate to the criminal activities as they relate to issues already before the Committee, and which came out in Michael Cohen's testimony. This is REAL oversight. Not the fake oversight that Devon Nunes pretended was looking into Russian interference, but was actually running cover for the Trump White House.

You've been watching 8 years of Republicans chase their tails while a clean running White House was in charge. If not for their manufactured and phony FOX News scandals, Republicans didn't have a whole hell of a lot to look into. When Democrats were in charge of the House previously, the Iran-Contra scandal was raging.

This is the problem: Republicans have gotten themselves into real messes in the White House going back to Nixon and Watergate. While Reagan wasn't directly implicated in Iran Contra, he took responsibility for it because if he didn't know, he should have. This President, who is the hand behind all of the scandals uncovered so far, denies all responsibility for anything. If it goes wrong, it's someone else's fault.

What a total putz!
What "criminal activities?" The subpoenas are harassment, pure an simple. They have no legitimate purpose. Rosenstein and Mueller ignored subpoenas because they are criminals trying to cover their tracks. They weren't going to hand over documents that show they are a couple of frauds.

Pay for play baby!!! The Inauguration Committee's $100 million fundraising, that no one knows who donated it, or where the money went.

Campaign finance violations which Cohen has already plead guilty to.

Evidence that Trump provided false information to both his insurers and his bankers in order to obtain loans. According to Jerry Nadler, Deutches Banke has already admitted that they knew Trump was lying to them about his net worth. But they made the loan anyway. How very interestesting. As a former banker I find that beyond odd.

The very first thing that I was taught as a banker is that if an applicant lies to you on the loan application, it's an automatic turn down, no matter how good his/her credit is. Yet here is a bank that knew Trump was lying to them and lent him the money anyway. AND THEN HE DEFAULTED ON THE LOAN. It's too rich.
I thought you claimed you were a para legal? the first thing I learned as a person is that people who tell you they do two different things, then they obviously a liar.

Nobody has just one job their entire lives. I starting in banking, worked for 9 years in banking, and then became a law clerk (which is what we call paralegals, in Canada), using my banking background as a huge asset in working in business and real estate law. I also worked in the insurance industry briefly. All three fields are directly related.
 
You're the one clinging to the denial "no collusion, no collusion".

Au contraire, dumbass. We have over 100 charges against 22 defendants, so far, with 8 convictions/guilty please, which is every person they've arrested..

What you have, oh proven ignorant partisan snowflake, are a couple of unrelated 'Process Crimes' that have nothing to do with the President and a desperate criminal prosecution of a man whose crime dates back more than a decade and has nothing to do with the now-proven FAKE, NON-EXISTENT 'Russian Collusion' accusation against the President.

Again, the only REAL evidence of criminal activity, illegal collusion, and sedition / treason that has been exposed is an overwhelming amount that leads right back to the Democrats / Obama Agency Leadership in his DOJ / NSA / CIA / FBI, to Hillary Clinton, and even to the proven co-conspirator investigators.

ACTUAL EVIDENCE SHOWS:

There is no evidence of crime committed that warranted an investigation.

There was never a crime committed warranting an investigation and appointment of a Special Counsel.

There is no evidence of a crime committed by the President.

When faced with these facts you be come triggered, you rant, you rave, and you point to the same un-associated indictments and convictions as if any of that has anything to do with the President and non-existent collusion - which none of it does.

It is sad to see how such bitter committed partisanship causes intelligent people to intentionally, willingly ignore proven facts and evidence simply because it does not support the false narrative and agenda of proven criminals.

Evidence - to include documents and multiple testimonies under oath - shows the DOJ and FBI collaborated and subverted the Rule of Law and its equal protection of every American citizen under that law by opening by illegally opening their own investigation of President Trump months before the official investigation began.

FBI Agent Paige testified that when the discussion began about the possibility of opening an official investigation of President Trump the FBI ALREADY KNEW - BASED ON THAT ALREADY ON-GOING INVESTIGATION - THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING AN ACCUSATION OF ILLEGAL COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS.

DOJ Employee Bruce Ohr declared / revealed in testimony under oath before Congress that:
-- HE HAD ALREADY INFORMED THE DOJ, NSA, CIA, AND FBI THAT STEELE HATED THE PRESIDENT, MAKING ANY ANYTHING HE HAD TO SAY / PROVIDED 'UN-USEABLE'.

-- HE HAD ALREADY INFORMED THE DOJ, NSA, CIA, AND FBI THE DOSSIER WAS 1) FROM STEELE (SEE PREVIOUS PT) & 2) WAS UN-USEABLE / UN-RELIABLE. (This - the fact that the Dossier was full of BS and was unverified - has been confirmed by multiple sources in the FBI and by Steele himself).

-- HE REPORTED THAT SOME INFORMATION CAME FROM THE RUSSIANS

-- Recently released transcripts of Steele's testimony reveals that some of the contents of the Dossier even came from a CNN ON-LINE BLOG.

:lmao:


Finally, despite all the denial, EVIDENCE ALSO SHOWS THE DOSSIER WAS THE KEYSTONE OF THE 'Secret Society's attempted coup d'état.

Both EVIDENCE and TESTIMONY exposed the fact that ex-FBI Agent Strzok worked with former CIA Director Brennan to author an Intel Community Assessment (ICA) - an Intel Assessment that is CASED ON LEGITIMATE INTEL - that was based on the DOSSIER.

Evidence shows former NSA Director & 2-time Perjurer Clapper controlled the dissemination of the ICA to select like-minded Intel members so they could control the responses they got back. Evidence shows Strzok and Brennan took those responses and used them to author the Intel Community Report (ICR).

The ICR, like the ICA, is required to be based on LEGITIMATE INTEL; yet, their ICR was based on the propaganda-filled. part Russian-authored, part CNN-Blog, un-useable / un-reliable Opposition Research report paid for by Hillary Clinton. Brennan personally briefed Congress on the ICR - on a LIE - in an attempt to con Congress into opening an investigation of the President BASED ON ZERO CRIME AND ZERO EVIDENCE. (Brennan later committed perjury under oath by claiming he never knew about the Dossier...until the official Congressional log proved he HAD briefed Congress on the ICR.) At the same time the FBI briefed the FISA Court on the ICR which, again, was based on the Dossier. At NO time did they mention that the bulk of the information came from Oppo-Research bought by Hillary Clinton (and from a CNN on-line blog).

Ohr testified that former FBI Director Mueller, prior to an official investigation was opened and before he was appointed Special Counsel, was ALREADY working with Ohr (DOJ) and Steele (a Trump-thing foreign spy working for the FBI) on the Dossier.

All of this has been exposed.
All of this has been revealed.
All of this has been documented.
All of this has been reported.
All of this comes from official Congressional testimony, some of the transcripts of which have been released.
All of this is confirmed by existing evidence, documents, and documented testimony.

As this has been discussed over and over and over, the links to the supporting / associated laws, testimony. transcripts, articles, etc have been posted and reposted again and again and again, so many times that people should have them memorized by now.

Yet every time this same issue gets brought up the Democrats / Liberals - and especially the snowflakes - act as if they are hearing this for the 1st time, act like they have never seen the 1st link to any of this, and - bottom line - deny it all, resulting in these same facts / points having to be brought up again.

I have no doubt you will launch another personal attack against me, you will rant and rave, and you will claim, again, that all this proven fact is all a lie, and you will cling to your hate-driven partisanship.

In the end, as was the fact when this post began, you will still have ZERO evidence of any crime of 'Illegal Russian Collusion' involving President Trump and will have ZERO evidence that such a crime even ever existed ... unless you are willing to mention the actual truth that involves Hillary Clinton.
 
You're the one clinging to the denial "no collusion, no collusion".

Au contraire, dumbass. We have over 100 charges against 22 defendants, so far, with 8 convictions/guilty please, which is every person they've arrested..

What you have, oh proven ignorant partisan snowflake, are a couple of unrelated 'Process Crimes' that have nothing to do with the President and a desperate criminal prosecution of a man whose crime dates back more than a decade and has nothing to do with the now-proven FAKE, NON-EXISTENT 'Russian Collusion' accusation against the President.

Again, the only REAL evidence of criminal activity, illegal collusion, and sedition / treason that has been exposed is an overwhelming amount that leads right back to the Democrats / Obama Agency Leadership in his DOJ / NSA / CIA / FBI, to Hillary Clinton, and even to the proven co-conspirator investigators.

ACTUAL EVIDENCE SHOWS:

There is no evidence of crime committed that warranted an investigation.

There was never a crime committed warranting an investigation and appointment of a Special Counsel.

There is no evidence of a crime committed by the President.

When faced with these facts you be come triggered, you rant, you rave, and you point to the same un-associated indictments and convictions as if any of that has anything to do with the President and non-existent collusion - which none of it does.

It is sad to see how such bitter committed partisanship causes intelligent people to intentionally, willingly ignore proven facts and evidence simply because it does not support the false narrative and agenda of proven criminals.

Evidence - to include documents and multiple testimonies under oath - shows the DOJ and FBI collaborated and subverted the Rule of Law and its equal protection of every American citizen under that law by opening by illegally opening their own investigation of President Trump months before the official investigation began.

FBI Agent Paige testified that when the discussion began about the possibility of opening an official investigation of President Trump the FBI ALREADY KNEW - BASED ON THAT ALREADY ON-GOING INVESTIGATION - THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE SUPPORTING AN ACCUSATION OF ILLEGAL COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS.

DOJ Employee Bruce Ohr declared / revealed in testimony under oath before Congress that:
-- HE HAD ALREADY INFORMED THE DOJ, NSA, CIA, AND FBI THAT STEELE HATED THE PRESIDENT, MAKING ANY ANYTHING HE HAD TO SAY / PROVIDED 'UN-USEABLE'.

-- HE HAD ALREADY INFORMED THE DOJ, NSA, CIA, AND FBI THE DOSSIER WAS 1) FROM STEELE (SEE PREVIOUS PT) & 2) WAS UN-USEABLE / UN-RELIABLE. (This - the fact that the Dossier was full of BS and was unverified - has been confirmed by multiple sources in the FBI and by Steele himself).

-- HE REPORTED THAT SOME INFORMATION CAME FROM THE RUSSIANS

-- Recently released transcripts of Steele's testimony reveals that some of the contents of the Dossier even came from a CNN ON-LINE BLOG.

:lmao:


Finally, despite all the denial, EVIDENCE ALSO SHOWS THE DOSSIER WAS THE KEYSTONE OF THE 'Secret Society's attempted coup d'état.

Both EVIDENCE and TESTIMONY exposed the fact that ex-FBI Agent Strzok worked with former CIA Director Brennan to author an Intel Community Assessment (ICA) - an Intel Assessment that is CASED ON LEGITIMATE INTEL - that was based on the DOSSIER.

Evidence shows former NSA Director & 2-time Perjurer Clapper controlled the dissemination of the ICA to select like-minded Intel members so they could control the responses they got back. Evidence shows Strzok and Brennan took those responses and used them to author the Intel Community Report (ICR).

The ICR, like the ICA, is required to be based on LEGITIMATE INTEL; yet, their ICR was based on the propaganda-filled. part Russian-authored, part CNN-Blog, un-useable / un-reliable Opposition Research report paid for by Hillary Clinton. Brennan personally briefed Congress on the ICR - on a LIE - in an attempt to con Congress into opening an investigation of the President BASED ON ZERO CRIME AND ZERO EVIDENCE. (Brennan later committed perjury under oath by claiming he never knew about the Dossier...until the official Congressional log proved he HAD briefed Congress on the ICR.) At the same time the FBI briefed the FISA Court on the ICR which, again, was based on the Dossier. At NO time did they mention that the bulk of the information came from Oppo-Research bought by Hillary Clinton (and from a CNN on-line blog).

Ohr testified that former FBI Director Mueller, prior to an official investigation was opened and before he was appointed Special Counsel, was ALREADY working with Ohr (DOJ) and Steele (a Trump-thing foreign spy working for the FBI) on the Dossier.

All of this has been exposed.
All of this has been revealed.
All of this has been documented.
All of this has been reported.
All of this comes from official Congressional testimony, some of the transcripts of which have been released.
All of this is confirmed by existing evidence, documents, and documented testimony.

As this has been discussed over and over and over, the links to the supporting / associated laws, testimony. transcripts, articles, etc have been posted and reposted again and again and again, so many times that people should have them memorized by now.

Yet every time this same issue gets brought up the Democrats / Liberals - and especially the snowflakes - act as if they are hearing this for the 1st time, act like they have never seen the 1st link to any of this, and - bottom line - deny it all, resulting in these same facts / points having to be brought up again.

I have no doubt you will launch another personal attack against me, you will rant and rave, and you will claim, again, that all this proven fact is all a lie, and you will cling to your hate-driven partisanship.

In the end, as was the fact when this post began, you will still have ZERO evidence of any crime of 'Illegal Russian Collusion' involving President Trump and will have ZERO evidence that such a crime even ever existed ... unless you are willing to mention the actual truth that involves Hillary Clinton.

You're the person who comes here ranting and raving about the criminal Clintons who have NEVER BEEN CHARGED WITH A CRIME in relation to their government work or their businesses, despite 25+ years of hostile Republican investigation and demands by Republicans that the Clintons be stopped!!!

All your bluster to deflect the 17 ongoing investigations against Donald J. Trump, his businesses, his money laundering, his bank fraud, insurance fraud, pay for play, campaign finance violations, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, dangling of pardons, and the lies.

A Complete Guide to All 17 (Known) Trump and Russia Investigations

Jerry Nadler says they have 10,000 pages of documents, some 2000 from Steve Bannon alone.

The Southern District of New York has been after Trump for decades. They sued him for fraud in the Trump University case, and shut down his charity for illegal fundraising. Now they're going after the whole Trump family for tax evasion in the transfer of Fred's estate.

And Trump is have a nervous breakdown via Twitter over all of it.
 
The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.was...c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

Nowhere to run. Even the Republicans are deserting his sorry ass.
The Trump Administration should just quit cooperating, and challenge every subpoena in court being that it has been proven that Mueller is conducting an illegal investigation, and was illegally appointed as a Special Counsel.

Really? And where is your link to unbiased, LEGAL and factual proof that the Mueller Investigation is illegal?

Maybe you can ask your God for it. You know the one? The one who approves of slavery and murder of said slaves.
'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'
 
The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.was...c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

Nowhere to run. Even the Republicans are deserting his sorry ass.
Rosenstein and Mueller ignored deadlines for documents....why do I feel if any of these people tried the same thing Democrats will / would immediately attempt to prosecute?! :p

Rosenstein and Mueller ignored subpoenas for documents relating to a current investigation, which Nunes and his Committee KNEW they couldn't hand over. Nunes request was strictly for partisan purposes and to make the Justice Department appear uncooperative when they were being nothing of the kind.

These documents relate to the criminal activities as they relate to issues already before the Committee, and which came out in Michael Cohen's testimony. This is REAL oversight. Not the fake oversight that Devon Nunes pretended was looking into Russian interference, but was actually running cover for the Trump White House.

You've been watching 8 years of Republicans chase their tails while a clean running White House was in charge. If not for their manufactured and phony FOX News scandals, Republicans didn't have a whole hell of a lot to look into. When Democrats were in charge of the House previously, the Iran-Contra scandal was raging.

This is the problem: Republicans have gotten themselves into real messes in the White House going back to Nixon and Watergate. While Reagan wasn't directly implicated in Iran Contra, he took responsibility for it because if he didn't know, he should have. This President, who is the hand behind all of the scandals uncovered so far, denies all responsibility for anything. If it goes wrong, it's someone else's fault.

What a total putz!
What "criminal activities?" The subpoenas are harassment, pure an simple. They have no legitimate purpose. Rosenstein and Mueller ignored subpoenas because they are criminals trying to cover their tracks. They weren't going to hand over documents that show they are a couple of frauds.
No evidence.

No crime.

Clinging on to denial / false accusations is all they have.

In 2+ years the only crime they have uncovered is their own.

They have proven they are incapable of doing their own job so, after 2 years of finding nothing they think they can stray into the IRS' lane and find (or manufacture) something the IRS has not found.

Its one big reality-denying, butt-hurt, sore-loser circus...

:p

You're the one clinging to the denial "no collusion, no collusion".

Au contraire, dumbass. We have over 100 charges against 22 defendants, so far, with 8 convictions/guilty please, which is every person they've arrested.

All defendants who have been arrested have either plead guilty and are cooperating, or they were found guilty. All are going to jail.

More crimes are being uncovered every day, because Trump can't help himself. He is so greedy, and thinks himself above the law, so he doesn't care.

And you support his insanity. Tweeting against his enemies, dead and living, while thousands of General Motors workers are losing the jobs he promised them he would save.

And today, nations around the world are condemning the United States for exporting white national terrorism to the world and giving comfort and support to right wing terrorists around the world. There are now four right wing terrorists who have cited Donald Trump as the "inspiration" for their crimes, while Dumb Donald can't even say the words "right wing terrorist". More than 50 people were murdered by right wing terrorists in the USA last year, two of whom stated that they were doing this to help Trump stop his enemies.

Everything Donald Trump touches, turns to shit. Everything.

Hey, troll girl, list each person whose conviction related to Russian collusion. We'll wait.
 
You're the person who comes here ranting and raving about the criminal Clintons who have NEVER BEEN CHARGED WITH A CRIME in relation to their government work or their businesses, despite 25+ years of hostile Republican investigation and demands by Republicans that the Clintons be stopped!!!

Thank you for pointing out the other false narrative / BOGUS argument snowflakes love to pull out in defense of their criminal Democrats......

One thing die-hard partisans like you will never admit is that it is not hard to protect a criminal member of your administration when 'you own the sheriff', when leaders / directors / people who run the agencies responsible for and capable of enforcing the law equally, those responsible for putting the criminals in jail are all loyal to 'you'.

Barak Obama's entire administration is the most criminal administration in US history. Despite promising to run the most transparent administration 'evuh' his administration instead set a new presidential record for criminal non-compliance with the FOIA and the Federal Records Act.
-- Most of his Agency Directors were exposed as owning and operating personal phone, personal e-mail accounts, and even aliases so they could conduct much of their official work without having to comply with those 'pesky' laws. Obama himself was exposed about lying about when he learned about the existence of Hillary's personal server, and it as revealed he had been using an alias to communicate with her via e-mail.
-- In one exposed case alone, the FBI publicly declared they had RECOVERED more than 15,000 OFFICIAL SUBPOENAED e-mails and documents Hillary had ILLEGALLY attempted to destroy (OBSTRUCTION) and confirmed than these 15,000+ documents had NOT been archived as required by the FOIA and Federal Records Act. (For those not good at math or who don't want to do the math because they don't want to accept this REALITY, that's more than 45,000 -- FORTY-FIVE THOUSAND -- CRIMINAL COUNTS Hillary should have been charged with: 15,000+ criminal counts EACH for 1) Obstruction, 2) Violation of the FOIA, and 3) Violation of the Federal Records Act

During his Presidency so many of his administration officials were caught committing Felony Perjury it was as if it was a bad thing to be someone left out / NOT being caught.

- NSA Director Clapper: The 1st (FIRST) time he was caught, he lied to Congress, it was proven that he perjured himself, and the Democrats in Congress quickly invited him back to testify again so he could 'correct his mistake'...thereby avoid being indicted.

- IRS Director John Koskinen: After perjuring himself before Congress in false testimony about Obama's use of the IRS against US Citizens who were legally opposing his re-election, Republicans asked Koskinen back, allowed him to repeat his perjury, and then played back for him a video-tape of his earlier testimony contradicting his latest testimony. In a move that has been repeated many time for elitist politicians but one not permitted for use by US Citizens, the Democrats quickly 'cut a deal' to prevent him from being indicted.

- CIA Director John Brennan: Brennan was caught perjuring himself, like Clapper, TWICE. The 1st time was when he lied to Congress claiming that he and his criminal, Constitutional Rights-violating CIA had NOT illegally spied on US citizens, reporters, the media, US Senators, and even USSC Justices. Diane Feinstein, a Democrat, was the one who brought this up - she was not concerned with the CIA spying on citizens, reporters, the media, or USSC Justices - she was worried about their spying on US Senators. (It is understood why now, as she has been exposed as having facilitated Chinese espionage for decades by having a Chinese spy on her staff.) Instead of being charged with his crime the GOP and Democrats cut another deal - Brennan's punishment was that he had to stand in front of Congress and admit he had committed perjury and illegally spied on the Senate.....THAT'S IT. The 2nd time, of course, was when Brennan lied about not knowing about the Trump Dossier, but official Congressional Logs show he briefed Congress on it.

- John Kiriakou: Former CIA official Kiriakou faced up to 30 years in prison after he was charged by the government with leaking classified information to journalists. Kiriakou was accused of giving "the names of two former colleagues who interrogated detainees using harsh practices including waterboarding" to journalists. In 2012, as part of a plea deal, Kiriakou plead guilty to leaking the identity of one of the CIA operatives and is currently serving a two and a half year jail term. The charges filed against him under the Espionage Act were dropped as part of the deal.

There are many more, but probably the biggest (aside from the evidence against Hillary being protected) involved Obama's US AG (and business partner now). US AG Eric Holder was proven to have perpetrated Felony Perjury before Congress in his false testimony attempting to keep Obama's Fast and Furious gun-running scandal covered up. Despite Obama's and Holder's hand-picked DOJ (who refused to take the case / indict their boss for his proven crimes), Congress decided it would not allow Holder to get away with his crimes. Congress passed a bi-partisan official CENSURE of US AG Holder, making Holder THE 1ST PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION CABINET MEMBER IN US HISTORY TO BE CENSURED (now part of Obama's 'Legacy', right up there with the '1st US Credit rating down-grade').


All of this and more, based on the documented factual history of the Obama administration, every time snowflakes resort to the BOGUS argument about no Obama administration member ever having been indicted / convicted, it is just pathetic and makes whoever tries to do so - many times YOU - look ridiculously partisan and accurately intentionally deceptive.



https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...scandal/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.61b9a82a2d10

Think Obama Administration Wasn't Corrupt? Think Again | Investor's Business Daily

8 Whistleblowers Charged With Violating the Espionage Act Under Obama
 
Last edited:
The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.was...c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

Nowhere to run. Even the Republicans are deserting his sorry ass.
The Trump Administration should just quit cooperating, and challenge every subpoena in court being that it has been proven that Mueller is conducting an illegal investigation, and was illegally appointed as a Special Counsel.

Really? And where is your link to unbiased, LEGAL and factual proof that the Mueller Investigation is illegal?

Maybe you can ask your God for it. You know the one? The one who approves of slavery and murder of said slaves.
'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'

The Mueller witch hunt was started illegally with insufficient evidence that a crime had been committed by Trump.
Just giving you a heads-up that McCabe's and Strzok"s "insurance policy" was more of a coup attempt than anything else.


What If The Constitutional Challenge to Mueller's Power Prevails?
"A constitutional law attorney has challenged the legitimacy and powers of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller in a federal court of appeals. "This challenge will go to the Supreme Court of the United States," attorney Paul Kamenar predicts."

Team Mueller’s Illegal, Unethical Hunt for the President’s Scalp | The American Spectator | Politics is too important to be taken seriously.

Trump says 'there should be no Mueller report'
"So, if there was knowingly & acknowledged to be 'zero' crime when the Special Counsel was appointed, and if the appointment was made based on the Fake Dossier (paid for by Crooked Hillary) and now disgraced Andrew McCabe (he & all stated no crime), then the Special Counsel...should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report," the president tweeted Friday.
 
It looks like the last desperate act by desperate democrats. I wonder when they are going to subpoena the documents from the Clinton Foundation? After the statute of limitations? Hmmm sounds familiar.
 
It looks like the last desperate act by desperate democrats. I wonder when they are going to subpoena the documents from the Clinton Foundation? After the statute of limitations? Hmmm sounds familiar.
I wonder if after they subpoena those documents if they will again let HER decide when she will do it and let HER decide what information on that server is 'personal' and what is 'official'....

:p
 
The 80 House subpoenas for Trump documents are due today. It’s being speculated that this tsunami of Russian threads attacking the left are to deflect from this little factoid.

https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.was...c249ec-3e87-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html

Nowhere to run. Even the Republicans are deserting his sorry ass.
The Trump Administration should just quit cooperating, and challenge every subpoena in court being that it has been proven that Mueller is conducting an illegal investigation, and was illegally appointed as a Special Counsel.

Really? And where is your link to unbiased, LEGAL and factual proof that the Mueller Investigation is illegal?

Maybe you can ask your God for it. You know the one? The one who approves of slavery and murder of said slaves.
'When a man strikes his male or female slave with a rod so hard that the slave dies under his hand, he shall be punished. If, however, the slave survives for a day or two, he is not to be punished, since the slave is his own property. (Exodus 21:20-21 NAB)'

The Mueller witch hunt was started illegally with insufficient evidence that a crime had been committed by Trump.
Just giving you a heads-up that McCabe's and Strzok"s "insurance policy" was more of a coup attempt than anything else.


What If The Constitutional Challenge to Mueller's Power Prevails?
"A constitutional law attorney has challenged the legitimacy and powers of Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller in a federal court of appeals. "This challenge will go to the Supreme Court of the United States," attorney Paul Kamenar predicts."

Team Mueller’s Illegal, Unethical Hunt for the President’s Scalp | The American Spectator | Politics is too important to be taken seriously.

Trump says 'there should be no Mueller report'
"So, if there was knowingly & acknowledged to be 'zero' crime when the Special Counsel was appointed, and if the appointment was made based on the Fake Dossier (paid for by Crooked Hillary) and now disgraced Andrew McCabe (he & all stated no crime), then the Special Counsel...should never have been appointed and there should be no Mueller Report," the president tweeted Friday.

None of that is 'proof'...just supposition.

If the Mueller investigation had been proven - in court - to be illegal then obviously it would have been stopped long ago.

That should go without saying.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top