Homosexuality and Mental Health Issues

rtwngAvngr said:
Just cuz you carpool with a mod doesn't make you cool, man! :halo:


bleh - Mods are nobody's...just like you and me. :)

What makes me cool is a mystery. I suppose it could be my 'personable' demeanor. My honesty and compassion? Maybe my warm smile, or passion for love and life. Hmm... :)
 
-=d=- said:
bleh - Mods are nobody's...just like you and me. :)

What makes me cool is a mystery. I suppose it could be my 'personable' demeanor. My honesty and compassion? Maybe my warm smile, or passion for love and life. Hmm... :)

It could be all of this and more.... :thup: ( :puke: )

I do know this, you suck at graphics! :poke: (actually you blow me away, fag.)
 
-=d=- said:
bleh - Mods are nobody's...just like you and me. :)

What makes me cool is a mystery. I suppose it could be my 'personable' demeanor. My honesty and compassion? Maybe my warm smile, or passion for love and life. Hmm... :)
I thought it was that rough and tumble motorcycle style you have, but thats just me. :thup: :laugh:
 
DKSuddeth said:
interesting article for some to read. :poke:

Study this

Psychoanalytic theory holds that homophobia -- the fear, anxiety, anger, discomfort and aversion that some ostensibly heterosexual people hold for gay individuals -- is the result of repressed homosexual urges that the person is either unaware of or denies. A study appearing in the August 1996 issue of the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, published by the American Psychological Association (APA), provides new empirical evidence that is consistent with that theory.

Researchers at the University of Georgia conducted an experiment involving 35 homophobic men and 29 nonhomophobic men as measured by the Index of Homophobia scale. All the participants selected for the study described themselves as exclusively heterosexual both in terms of sexual arousal and experience.

Each participant was exposed to sexually explicit erotic stimuli consisting of heterosexual, male homosexual and lesbian videotapes (but not necessarily in that order). Their degree of sexual arousal was measured by penile plethysmography, which precisely measures and records male tumescence.

Men in both groups were aroused by about the same degree by the video depicting heterosexual sexual behavior and by the video showing two women engaged in sexual behavior. The only significant difference in degree of arousal between the two groups occurred when they viewed the video depicting male homosexual sex: 'The homophobic men showed a significant increase in penile circumference to the male homosexual video, but the control [nonhomophobic] men did not.'

What a wonderful test. I guess that does it then. It proves I'm not a homophobe. Because I don't even have to SEE any homo pictures. Just the THOUGHT of two men engaged in ANY type of sexual activity, and my stomach is upset with "disgust", not "fear". And if my stomach is upset, johnson ain't standin' up for NOBODY.
 
http://www.amazinginfoonhomosexuals.com/homophobia.htm


Homophobia

Introduction: Phobia refers to a mental illness related to fear. Therefore, so-called homophobia should refer to a mental illness related to the fear of homosexuals or homosexuality. Interestingly, while homosexuals vehemently reject being considered mentally ill, they have no problems regarding those who dislike homosexuality as mentally ill.

Some mental health professionals have proposed that racism, sexism, and homophobia constitute a form of psychopathology deserving of its own category, namely intolerant personality disorder. (1) Kantor has even proposed an extensive typology of homophobia, arguing that homophobia exists in paranoid, affective, phobic-avoidant, obsessive-compulsive, and other forms corresponding to personality disorders. (2) Kantor has also invoked “genetically determined attitudes and behavior” in the etiology of homophobia. (2)

It is hard to imagine people being scared of homosexuals. However, if phobia denotes fear only, then far more heterophobic homosexuals than homophobic heterosexuals exist. Fear need not follow from hatred or vice versa. For instance, one could fear riding a motorcycle, but one need not hate motorcycles because one is scared of riding one. Similarly, one could hate Jar Jar Binks ®, but nobody fears him. Homosexuals and homophiles know this, and they define homophobia in terms of hatred of homosexuals or homosexuality. Some definitions of homophobia include an opposition to the demands of homosexuals, which is very curious.

Consider the following statement on the part of a conservative Christian who is commenting on a book written by a Christian on how to deal with homosexual activism:

“Missing from his list of recommendations for heterosexual victims of homosexual activism are such possibilities as protest, radical violent and nonviolent cooperation, zerotolerance stances, suing the homosexual activist, and legal interventions, including protection orders from homosexual activists and suing analysts in situations where homophilic attitudes of the analyst cause harm.”

The statement above will clearly be seen as homophobic. However, this statement is a slightly altered form of a statement by a homophile commenting on a book written on homophobia, and the actual statement is unlikely to be seen as heterophobic . [1]

Many homosexuals and homophiles label someone homophobic as they please. Anyone who questions their labeling someone a homophobe himself becomes a homophobe. Even quoting factual statistics about the connection between homosexuality and AIDS is allegedly homophobic. Homosexuals have become so reckless in labeling others homophobic that the day is not far when someone will be labeled a homophobe for not praising homosexuality, and this may have already happened in some circles. Less common terms used in lieu of homophobia, such as homoerotophobia and homosexophobia, also link a dislike of homosexuality to phobias, although homonegativism is an exception. Therefore, due to ambiguity and lack of standardization, the use of self-explanatory terms such as homo-disgust, homo-hatred, and homo-opposition is warranted. However, such terminology is unlikely to be adopted by left-identified academics because none of these terms possess an implicit notion of institutional discrimination, which they blame for the problems of homosexuals. In fact, homosexual and homophile academics have started shifting toward the use of heterosexism in lieu of homophobia given the ambiguity of homophobia and the attractiveness of bringing the literature on prejudice and discrimination against homosexuals in line with the rich literature on racism and sexism.

Having experienced prejudice and discrimination at the hands of homosexuals, bisexuals have come up with…you guessed it…biphobia, as well as monosexism, which refers to institutional structures, beliefs, or behaviors that are informed by the consideration that monosexualities (i.e., homosexuality or heterosexuality) are the only legitimate forms of sexuality. See if you can guess the meaning of the following phobias [and corresponding institutional discrimination terminology], soon to be added to the ever growing list of phobias plaguing humans: pedophobia [teleiosexism], sadomasophobia [soothesexism], hermaphophobia [gendersexism], transvestophobia [cisvestosexism], urophileophobia [hydrosexism], and pansexophobia [taxonosexism].

Opposition to some demands of homosexuals need not necessarily follow from the hatred of homosexuals. Likewise, someone may find homosexual behaviors disgusting but not oppose several demands of homosexuals out of a sense of justice or fairness.

On the other hand, while homosexual activists blame so-called homophobia for elevated psychiatric morbidity among homosexuals, a large body of evidence shows that this claim is unfounded (see 1, 2). In addition, disgust at homosexual behavior is largely innate (see the two studies cited on the Christianity page).

Footnotes:

[1]“Missing from his list of recommendations for lesbian and gay victims of homophobia are such possibilities as protest, radical violent and nonviolent cooperation, zerotolerance stances, suing the homophobe, and legal interventions, including protection orders from homophobes and suing analysts in situations where homophobic attitudes of the analyst cause harm.” (3)

References:

M. H. Guindon, A. G. Green, F. J. Hanna, Am J Orthopsychiatry 73, 167 (Apr, 2003).
M. Kantor, Homophobia: description, development, and dynamic of gay bashing (Praeger, New York, 1998).
B. R. S. Rosser, J Sex Res 36, 211 (May, 1999).
 

Forum List

Back
Top