Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I will admit that I do fear homosexuals.The issue is that you don't believe you fear something that is not danger to you. The study shows that people who are uncomfortable with the idea of homosexuality do fear it and have personality disorders.
If you are not afraid of it, then what is the problem? It is no danger to you. It is something two consenting adults do in their bedroom. It doesn't do you any harm. It is fine to disagree with it, but why be so expressive and angry about it? Why not live and let live?"homophobic" is a fake word created to describe a fake "condition" people with an agenda invented to either further their fake "psychology" careers .....or for a perceived political advantage by using a negative term to describe people they disagree with..
people may not like/agree with faggotry but not many are "afraid" of it...
Where is the angry response? Are you kidding? Every post.I think that's really an important point. Those who feel very threatened by this study, so threatened they can't engage in civil discourse....that's very telling. If you are not threatened, why has this study triggered such an angry response?
I'm not being angry with you. I think I'd like you to read the article before giving a knee jerk response to the title.
Read what I wrote ... you claim we are giving an 'angry response'. Where?
You didn't answer my second point ... Where is the tolerance from you guys of those with opposing viewpoints on this issue?
You know, if you would only read the article and explain with what in the article you disagree, aside from the term homophobic, that would be nice. You are only responding to one word; the original post is about the entire study.According to the study, people's basic mental health was surveyed along with their attitude toward homosexuality. It has nothing to do with making assumptions.
According to the first word in the article, those who do not adhere to 'all things homosexual' are afraid and/or haters of homosexuals.
Talk about making assumptions.
You said you didn't get past the first word and then YOU made assumptions that were incorrect.
Its very telling that some are very threatened by a civil conversation about this. It proves the OP is correct.
So the use of the term 'homophobe' does NOT mean that you guys believe that anyone who does not understand (for lack of a better word) the homosexual lifestyle is either afraid and/or a hater of homosexuals? Cause that's sure how you guys mean it when you use the term.
I don't understand homosexuality but it doesn't threaten me. Nor do I believe they should have fewer rights than I do.
So if someone called you a homophobe due to your lack of understanding, they'd be correct? Again, because that is what you guys do when someone does not tow the line with the homosexual mantra.
Where are you getting that homosexuality it threatening others? Because they have a differing viewpoint on it? Religious people view h/s as a sin. Where is your understanding of their differing viewpoint?
You haven't actually expressed an opinion that is a response to the full article and description of the study. You have only posted angry responses to the title.I think that's really an important point. Those who feel very threatened by this study, so threatened they can't engage in civil discourse....that's very telling. If you are not threatened, why has this study triggered such an angry response?
I'm not being angry with you. I think I'd like you to read the article before giving a knee jerk response to the title.
Read what I wrote ... you claim we are giving an 'angry response'. Where?
You didn't answer my second point ... Where is the tolerance from you guys of those with opposing viewpoints on this issue?
I don't think so, Tim.
If you are not afraid of it, then what is the problem? It is no danger to you. It is something two consenting adults do in their bedroom. It doesn't do you any harm. It is fine to disagree with it, but why be so expressive and angry about it? Why not live and let live?"homophobic" is a fake word created to describe a fake "condition" people with an agenda invented to either further their fake "psychology" careers .....or for a perceived political advantage by using a negative term to describe people they disagree with..
people may not like/agree with faggotry but not many are "afraid" of it...
I'm not afraid of it. I find it repulsive, counter productive and narcissistic. So what? Humans are flawed creatures. I can't stop homosexuality... and never thought of trying...but the word is a fake, purposely biased word as I said.
According to the study, people's basic mental health was surveyed along with their attitude toward homosexuality. It has nothing to do with making assumptions.
According to the first word in the article, those who do not adhere to 'all things homosexual' are afraid and/or haters of homosexuals.
Talk about making assumptions.
You said you didn't get past the first word and then YOU made assumptions that were incorrect.
Its very telling that some are very threatened by a civil conversation about this. It proves the OP is correct.
So the use of the term 'homophobe' does NOT mean that you guys believe that anyone who does not understand (for lack of a better word) the homosexual lifestyle is either afraid and/or a hater of homosexuals? Cause that's sure how you guys mean it when you use the term.
I don't understand homosexuality but it doesn't threaten me. Nor do I believe they should have fewer rights than I do.
So if someone called you a homophobe due to your lack of understanding, they'd be correct? Again, because that is what you guys do when someone does not tow the line with the homosexual mantra.
Where are you getting that homosexuality it threatening others? Because they have a differing viewpoint on it? Religious people view h/s as a sin. Where is your understanding of their differing viewpoint?
The word is the insult.Who s she insulting unless you personally identify as homophobic?Then I call "Foul"The Clean Debate Zone is to be used for the clean debating of Government Policies, Candidates, Current News and Events ONLY. No personal attacks, name calling, flaming etc is allowed in this section
The title of the thread starts with, not only, name calling but a misnomer of a name at that.
If you truly want an honest discussion, you don't start the conversation by insulting those that have a different opinion
If you do not, youre not a part and parcel human to this study.
According to the first word in the article, those who do not adhere to 'all things homosexual' are afraid and/or haters of homosexuals.
Talk about making assumptions.
You said you didn't get past the first word and then YOU made assumptions that were incorrect.
Its very telling that some are very threatened by a civil conversation about this. It proves the OP is correct.
So the use of the term 'homophobe' does NOT mean that you guys believe that anyone who does not understand (for lack of a better word) the homosexual lifestyle is either afraid and/or a hater of homosexuals? Cause that's sure how you guys mean it when you use the term.
I don't understand homosexuality but it doesn't threaten me. Nor do I believe they should have fewer rights than I do.
So if someone called you a homophobe due to your lack of understanding, they'd be correct? Again, because that is what you guys do when someone does not tow the line with the homosexual mantra.
Where are you getting that homosexuality it threatening others? Because they have a differing viewpoint on it? Religious people view h/s as a sin. Where is your understanding of their differing viewpoint?
According to Christian doctrine, adultery is also a sin, but not only are Christians not having fits about other peoples' adultery, half of them are engaging in it themselves.
Normal pll?
Today, its in the 60's.
"Normal people" woke up after awareness was raised. Homophobes and zealots did not.
Im not gay, and lacking any indisputable rationale is why the homophobe label is cast.The word is the insult.Who s she insulting unless you personally identify as homophobic?Then I call "Foul"The Clean Debate Zone is to be used for the clean debating of Government Policies, Candidates, Current News and Events ONLY. No personal attacks, name calling, flaming etc is allowed in this section
The title of the thread starts with, not only, name calling but a misnomer of a name at that.
If you truly want an honest discussion, you don't start the conversation by insulting those that have a different opinion
If you do not, youre not a part and parcel human to this study.
It's meant to marginalize anyone that doesn't support the homosexual lifestyle as normal.
Phobic implies an irrational fear.
There is no fear in someone identifying a mental disorder.
You're free to stick your dick wherever one wants....whether it's another man's ass or a vegomatic. But you don't get to tell me I have a "phobia" for having enough intelligence to know that it's not 'normal' behavior.
I'm not denying you any 'rights' by telling you that you have a mental disorder.
I would only hope that one day you would stop sticking your dick in strange places.
I'd still hang out with you and have some beers. Just like I hang out with bipolars and PTSDs and go fishing or drinking with them.
But, just like them, I'd hope the homosexual gets the help they need.
Does that make me a BiPolarphobe or a PTSDphobe?
Then stop
Link?According to the first word in the article, those who do not adhere to 'all things homosexual' are afraid and/or haters of homosexuals.
Talk about making assumptions.
You said you didn't get past the first word and then YOU made assumptions that were incorrect.
Its very telling that some are very threatened by a civil conversation about this. It proves the OP is correct.
So the use of the term 'homophobe' does NOT mean that you guys believe that anyone who does not understand (for lack of a better word) the homosexual lifestyle is either afraid and/or a hater of homosexuals? Cause that's sure how you guys mean it when you use the term.
I don't understand homosexuality but it doesn't threaten me. Nor do I believe they should have fewer rights than I do.
So if someone called you a homophobe due to your lack of understanding, they'd be correct? Again, because that is what you guys do when someone does not tow the line with the homosexual mantra.
Where are you getting that homosexuality it threatening others? Because they have a differing viewpoint on it? Religious people view h/s as a sin. Where is your understanding of their differing viewpoint?
According to Christian doctrine, adultery is also a sin, but not only are Christians not having fits about other peoples' adultery, half of them are engaging in it themselves.
I'm not telling people who don't agree with homosexuality they don't have equal rights or they are second class citizens. I'm not hindering their lives or lifestyles. How am I not being tolerant?You said you didn't get past the first word and then YOU made assumptions that were incorrect.
Its very telling that some are very threatened by a civil conversation about this. It proves the OP is correct.
So the use of the term 'homophobe' does NOT mean that you guys believe that anyone who does not understand (for lack of a better word) the homosexual lifestyle is either afraid and/or a hater of homosexuals? Cause that's sure how you guys mean it when you use the term.
I don't understand homosexuality but it doesn't threaten me. Nor do I believe they should have fewer rights than I do.
So if someone called you a homophobe due to your lack of understanding, they'd be correct? Again, because that is what you guys do when someone does not tow the line with the homosexual mantra.
Where are you getting that homosexuality it threatening others? Because they have a differing viewpoint on it? Religious people view h/s as a sin. Where is your understanding of their differing viewpoint?
According to Christian doctrine, adultery is also a sin, but not only are Christians not having fits about other peoples' adultery, half of them are engaging in it themselves.
You didn't answer my question.
Where is your tolerance from you guys of the religious who view homosexuality as a sin? Isn't that what being a liberal means?
Support for their cause, however, is not abmormal.Normal pll?
Today, its in the 60's.
"Normal people" woke up after awareness was raised. Homophobes and zealots did not.
Sorry, GT. Homosexuality is abnormal. So is an autistic person.
And in the 80s more people liked Crack.Normal pll?
Today, its in the 60's.
"Normal people" woke up after awareness was raised. Homophobes and zealots did not.
At no time ever did a majority approve of crack........wtff?And in the 80s more people liked Crack.Normal pll?
Today, its in the 60's.
"Normal people" woke up after awareness was raised. Homophobes and zealots did not.
Approval does not equal right
Half of all the married people on the planet are adulterers. Religious people behave no better than anyone else in the area of adultery.Link?You said you didn't get past the first word and then YOU made assumptions that were incorrect.
Its very telling that some are very threatened by a civil conversation about this. It proves the OP is correct.
So the use of the term 'homophobe' does NOT mean that you guys believe that anyone who does not understand (for lack of a better word) the homosexual lifestyle is either afraid and/or a hater of homosexuals? Cause that's sure how you guys mean it when you use the term.
I don't understand homosexuality but it doesn't threaten me. Nor do I believe they should have fewer rights than I do.
So if someone called you a homophobe due to your lack of understanding, they'd be correct? Again, because that is what you guys do when someone does not tow the line with the homosexual mantra.
Where are you getting that homosexuality it threatening others? Because they have a differing viewpoint on it? Religious people view h/s as a sin. Where is your understanding of their differing viewpoint?
According to Christian doctrine, adultery is also a sin, but not only are Christians not having fits about other peoples' adultery, half of them are engaging in it themselves.
Are half of them stealing and killing also?
Let's be fair to all the sinners
If being a mental disorder can only be held as opinion then the same can be said for claiming it is NOTIm not gay, and lacking any indisputable rationale is why the homophobe label is cast.The word is the insult.Who s she insulting unless you personally identify as homophobic?Then I call "Foul"The Clean Debate Zone is to be used for the clean debating of Government Policies, Candidates, Current News and Events ONLY. No personal attacks, name calling, flaming etc is allowed in this section
The title of the thread starts with, not only, name calling but a misnomer of a name at that.
If you truly want an honest discussion, you don't start the conversation by insulting those that have a different opinion
If you do not, youre not a part and parcel human to this study.
It's meant to marginalize anyone that doesn't support the homosexual lifestyle as normal.
Phobic implies an irrational fear.
There is no fear in someone identifying a mental disorder.
You're free to stick your dick wherever one wants....whether it's another man's ass or a vegomatic. But you don't get to tell me I have a "phobia" for having enough intelligence to know that it's not 'normal' behavior.
I'm not denying you any 'rights' by telling you that you have a mental disorder.
I would only hope that one day you would stop sticking your dick in strange places.
I'd still hang out with you and have some beers. Just like I hang out with bipolars and PTSDs and go fishing or drinking with them.
But, just like them, I'd hope the homosexual gets the help they need.
Does that make me a BiPolarphobe or a PTSDphobe?
Then stop
Its not a mental disorder, thats an opinion and notan established fact. You choose to hold it as an opinion, and your choice to do so reflects on your willingness to empathize and understand your fellow human beings.
Right or wrong isn't decided in the court of popular opinionAt no time ever did a majority approve of crack........wtff?And in the 80s more people liked Crack.Normal pll?
Today, its in the 60's.
"Normal people" woke up after awareness was raised. Homophobes and zealots did not.
Approval does not equal right
