With Ukraine, I agree, but not 3rd-world shitholes.See the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol. All asylum seekers have rights and none of them are illegal.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
With Ukraine, I agree, but not 3rd-world shitholes.See the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol. All asylum seekers have rights and none of them are illegal.
See the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol. All asylum seekers have rights and none of them are illegal.
It is not illegal to seek sanctury in any safe country. It is just that our racust overnment doesnt like it.
They are just living in denial. No country is obliged to lock these people and the likes of France is not obiged to take them back.
The fantasy they pushed was that brexit would see us able to stop all of this "by taking back control".
Tough shit. Countries that invade places should accept their share of picking up the pieces.
See the 1951 Geneva Convention and the 1967 Protocol. All asylum seekers have rights and none of them are illegal.
The UK doesnt have to take them. It has to give them asylum whilst they assess their claim. In this way we can weed out genuine refugees from bogus ones.Post the part that says the UK has to take them.
Because ?With Ukraine, I agree, but not 3rd-world shitholes.
If they illegally enter your country and are from the African continent then I see no issue with taking them to Rwanda and processing them back to their country of origin…Migrant crisis: Home Office 'planning to send migrants to Rwanda' for processing
A Home Office spokesperson told Sky News: "As set out in our New Plan for Immigration, we are committed to working closely with a range of international partners as we continue to fix our broken asylum system."news.sky.com
Believe it or not this is current government policy. They intend flying migrants from the UK to Rwanda to keep in Gitmo style detention camps.
Not Ukranian refugees though. They are generally white so are not a problem. These migrants are the darke version who cross the channel in small boat. Its just about the most racist policy I have ever seen and converts Rwanda into a colonial penal colony.
Of course the main driver on this is the need to distract from johnsons problems with the police. They even gave it a name - Operation Save Big Dog.
It shames the UK and is yet more evidence that conservative wickedness knows no depths.
The UK doesnt have to take them. It has to give them asylum whilst they assess their claim. In this way we can weed out genuine refugees from bogus ones.
But someone coming from Afghnistan,Libya,Syria and Iraq is likely to be genuine.#These are countries that ee have recently fucked up.
The UK doesnt have to take them. It has to give them asylum whilst they assess their claim.
Post the part that says that.
We are sending people to a country wherethe rule of law is subverted..
It's the whole entitlement garbage with Tommy and the desire to think someone is owed something.
Technically ... The UK could just say "No" regardless of who is applying for asylum or where they come from.
There are thousands of ways a Foreign National can be eligible for asylum and request it ...
But in most cases, no real obligation for anyone to accept it.
The best way to destroy a Nation ... Encourage it to destroy itself in the name of Humanity ...
.
We are sending people to a country wherethe rule of law is subverted.
We accept refugees from Rwanda. How does that make sense ?
If you want to help them go down there and teach them English and/or butt sex.We are sending people to a country wherethe rule of law is subverted.
We accept refugees from Rwanda. How does that make sense ?