Hockey stick Creator loses in Court

[Manonthestreet]

In the pre-trial Discovery Process, the parties must give up key evidence in a reasonable fashion, that proves or disproves the Claim.

Dr. Mann lost his case because he abused Discovery by refusing to honor the “concessions” he made to Ball in 2018 to finally show in open court his R2 regression numbers (Mann’s math ‘working out’) for his graph (see ‘update’ at foot of article).

Dr. Ball has always argued that those numbers—if examined in open court—would prove Mann was motivated to commit a criminal fraud. Breaking: Dr. Tim Ball Defeats Michael 'Hockey Stick' Mann’s Climate Lawsuit
and yet we are still making policy as if this is settled science. Brilliant.

 

[Billy_Bob]

If Mann's work ever see's the light of public scrutiny he will be branded a liar and fraudster. His career and 'professional trust' are over with this loss, as there will now be a cascade of losses with other suits he has placed. The case law can now be used against him.

Cue Mark Steyn's case is up next... And he is elated to get this public information about Mann's trustworthiness. The judge used the term "Intentional" to describe Mann's abuse of the process. It's very doubtful that Mann has any standing, without new compelling evidence, for appeal.

 

[Billy_Bob]

We hashed it out here;>> BREAKING – Dr. Tim Ball wins @MichaelEMann lawsuit – Mann has to pay