Climate Fraud: The Beginning

Discussion in 'Environment' started by baileyn45, Oct 12, 2019.

  1. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    106,542
    Thanks Received:
    19,525
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +74,895
    If it's "Science" where's the data?

    Pretty fucking straightforward
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    106,542
    Thanks Received:
    19,525
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    NYC
    Ratings:
    +74,895
    Chain yourself to the Chinese Embassy to protest their carbon footprint
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Muhammed
    Offline

    Muhammed Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    15,622
    Thanks Received:
    2,164
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    North Coast, USA
    Ratings:
    +11,294
    ^^^
    Wikidiot
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. abu afak
    Offline

    abu afak ALLAH SNACKBAR!

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2006
    Messages:
    2,926
    Thanks Received:
    616
    Trophy Points:
    315
    Ratings:
    +2,164
    LinkLess, FactLess, Cumstain.
     
  5. BuckToothMoron
    Offline

    BuckToothMoron Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2016
    Messages:
    8,961
    Thanks Received:
    1,586
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,229
    You absolutely nailed it! Bravo!

    The earth’s climate is an incredibly complicated system with multiple factors which all have varying degrees of influence that constantly change. The idea that we can understand it well enough to predict what will happen over the next decade is completely absurd. That is why there has never been a model that has accurately predicted the climate. Nobody can show me a model from the last decade that predicted today’s climate.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Dick Foster
    Offline

    Dick Foster Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2018
    Messages:
    2,769
    Thanks Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    The People's Republic of the Californicated
    Ratings:
    +2,998
    You're not going to do anything anyway, numbskull. You can't change the weather must less the climate. The lack the means and the mentality. Besides you can't fix what isn't broken. Get a clue and quit living your life shrouded in ignorance and stupidity.
     
  7. Muhammed
    Offline

    Muhammed Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2010
    Messages:
    15,622
    Thanks Received:
    2,164
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    North Coast, USA
    Ratings:
    +11,294
    Duh, cuz wiki sed so, derp derp. :rolleyes:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2019
  8. ReinyDays
    Offline

    ReinyDays Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages:
    450
    Thanks Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    State of Jefferson
    Ratings:
    +212
    Yeah ... pretty damn amazing that the one I click didn't support your claim, it doesn't refute your claim either ... no, I haven't read any others ... when we bet on a 1 in 100 odds and win, we quit ... I'm absolute sure my next 99 clicks will be papers that confirm your claim ... so why bother? ... I would suggest reading the entire paper, especially how the researchers managed error ... the paper in question states that their time reference was corrupted, so they used a more inaccurate reference ... not my fault, just the way things are ...

    If you're familiar with the ice core data, then you can see temperatures go up and back down over a 125,000 year period ... there's a lot of speculation why this is so, but no one knows for sure ... there's far more about the climate we don't know than we do ... research continues ...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. baileyn45
    Offline

    baileyn45 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2015
    Messages:
    4,926
    Thanks Received:
    2,578
    Trophy Points:
    1,030
    Ratings:
    +4,761
    How can it be confirmed when he won't release the data it's based on? No one can replicate his work because they have no access to the data. How is this science?

    The data is not readily available, Mann recently lost another court case because he will not show the data. You do realize that he was held in contempt of court in British Columbia for that very reason.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. baileyn45
    Offline

    baileyn45 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2015
    Messages:
    4,926
    Thanks Received:
    2,578
    Trophy Points:
    1,030
    Ratings:
    +4,761
    For the love of God, this is not science. Look at your first statement.

    "Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change"

    No one disputes man made emissions
    This is science?

    Various surveys? Consensus opinions? C'mon, do better. How did she find the "928 abstracts"? This smacks of the 97% nonsense. This isn't popularity contest. You either have proof of your position or you don't. Period.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1

Share This Page