Hillary's attorney: Hillary wiped her email server clean, erased ALL emails

Little-Acorn

Gold Member
Jun 20, 2006
10,025
2,410
290
San Diego, CA
Hillary's attorney, David Kendall, is quoted here about the server Hillary had used to store and process all her emails, saying: "no emails ... reside on the server or on any backup systems associated with the server."

In other words, the server has been wiped clean, with all emails that were on it, permanently deleted.

That's an interesting statement, coming from a lawyer.

Hillary has said that she decided for us, which emails she would allow us to see. She printed those out on paper, and then erased all the emails she thought we should not see. Her excuse was that she had decided they were not "work related". Now her lawyer says she erased ALL the emails on the server, apparently after preserving non-machine-searchable copies of some of them on paper.

Have a look at US Code, Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 101, Section 2071. It's a Federal law governing such things.

18 U.S. Code 2071 - Concealment removal or mutilation generally LII Legal Information Institute
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

(a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away
any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of
any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.


Note that this applies to "any record" held by a public official, not just the ones the person decides it's OK for us to see.

By deleting the emails she had decided we wouldn't be allowed to see, Hillary violated this law.

In other words, with her legal representative stating that she destroyed the records she possessed and had decided not to allow us to see, she is now disqualified from holding any office. Including President. Barred by Federal law.

From her lawyer's mouth.

The big question: Will she obey this law???

------------------------------------------------------

Gowdy Clinton wiped email server clean deleted all emails - Yahoo News

Clinton wiped email server clean, deleted all emails

Associated Press
By MATTHEW DALY
45 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton wiped her email server "clean," permanently deleting all emails from it, the Republican chairman of a House committee investigating the 2012 Benghazi attacks said Friday.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said the former secretary of state has failed to produce a single new document in recent weeks and has refused to relinquish her server to a third party for an independent review, as Gowdy has requested.

Clinton's attorney, David Kendall, said Gowdy was looking in the wrong place.

In a six-page letter released late Friday, Kendall said Clinton had turned over to the State Department all work-related emails sent or received during her tenure as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013.

"The Department of State is therefore in possession of all Secretary Clinton's work-related emails from the (personal email) account," Kendall wrote.

Kendall also said it would be pointless for Clinton to turn over her server, even if legally authorized, since "no emails ... reside on the server or on any backup systems associated with the server."
 
Last edited:
qkUU2Jb.jpg
 
Good thread. I think obstruction of justice should be added to the charges since she destroyed the documents after learning Congress wanted to see them.
 
Good thread. I think obstruction of justice should be added to the charges since she destroyed the documents after learning Congress wanted to see them.
Since she destroyed ALL the emails there is NOTHING to support ANY of the printed version as being the truth either.

The ones she turned over could be false as well.
 
Good thread. I think obstruction of justice should be added to the charges since she destroyed the documents after learning Congress wanted to see them.
Since she destroyed ALL the emails there is NOTHING to support ANY of the printed version as being the truth either.
The ones she turned over could be false as well.
But she told us they were "not work related".

Would she lie? Naw.
 
and the nation continues to not give a shit.

Then some people wonder why we are led by the blessed elite and the masses are totally ignored.
 
Time to issue a warrant and seize the server(s), and turn them over to DOJ computer forensics experts... they may not be as 'deleted' as she wants everyone to think.
 
Absolutely. But Billary isn't stupid either. Don't be surprised if her server meets with an unfortunate "accident" as has been the case with evidence or people in the Clintons long and sordid history.
 
I remember during Watergate the courts stepped in and ordered the Nixon tapes to be turned over to the investigative sub-committee.
 
Depotoo

Gee, didn't think about those foundation records. The IRS could have a field day with that one.
 
Absolutely. But Billary isn't stupid either. Don't be surprised if her server meets with an unfortunate "accident" as has been the case with evidence or people in the Clintons long and sordid history.
Quite possibly... a fine argument for speed, in obtaining and executing the warrant.
 
Good thread. I think obstruction of justice should be added to the charges since she destroyed the documents after learning Congress wanted to see them.
Since she destroyed ALL the emails there is NOTHING to support ANY of the printed version as being the truth either.
The ones she turned over could be false as well.
But she told us they were "not work related".

Would she lie? Naw.
Shaking down foreign and domestic sources for contributions is the business of the Clintons.
 

Forum List

Back
Top